Jump to content


Fifth Campaign Fame point cutoff estimate


  • Please log in to reply
115 replies to this topic

Yu86 #101 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 09:13

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 17055 battles
  • 274
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    09-18-2012

View PostiWrangleEmus, on Dec 12 2016 - 08:50, said:

Yu86 the unused clan licenses roll over to Personal licenses this has been done for all big campaigns. there will be a total of 3k tanks. 

 

Thx

PS: but then clan tool cutting line doesn't make sense now. That many top 15 claners fall out of 3000 line?


Edited by Yu86, Dec 12 2016 - 09:15.


iWrangleEmus #102 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 09:19

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31561 battles
  • 123
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013

well u can look one of our guys has 975 ish fame points and gets a tank. there are many people on clantools after the cut off that are getting tanks due to clan licenses

 



CranKextreme #103 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 10:47

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 25277 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    07-28-2014

View Postcloudwalkr, on Dec 12 2016 - 08:27, said:

yup, looks like tgulog missed it by 3 points.

 

12 points instead, the 2 players above got it via clan license

still feels bad, 250 battles to fall short by just 1 battle, even a defeat 



iWrangleEmus #104 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 13:14

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31561 battles
  • 123
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013

There is a guy with 298 games not getting a tank

 



The_Ultimate_Wargasm #105 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 15:00

    Sergeant

  • WGLNA Bronze League Player
  • 18875 battles
  • 239
  • [Y0L0] Y0L0
  • Member since:
    12-24-2012
I'm tempted to throw a couple bucks worth of gold his way....imagine if 50 people sent that poor guy 500g....

Yankee #106 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 15:09

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 32355 battles
  • 9,484
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010
We did that before , I forget which campaign

Edge_of_Insanity #107 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 16:02

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14421 battles
  • 1,507
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2012

View PostThe_Ultimate_Wargasm, on Dec 12 2016 - 09:00, said:

I'm tempted to throw a couple bucks worth of gold his way....imagine if 50 people sent that poor guy 500g....

 

View PostYankee, on Dec 12 2016 - 09:09, said:

We did that before , I forget which campaign

 

From my experience with him its not worth it.

Yu86 #108 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 16:34

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 17055 battles
  • 274
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    09-18-2012

View PostYankee, on Dec 12 2016 - 15:09, said:

We did that before , I forget which campaign

 

2nd

trondd #109 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 16:38

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14320 battles
  • 122
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostEdge_of_Insanity, on Dec 12 2016 - 16:02, said:

 

 

From my experience with him its not worth it.

 

Whats that supposed to mean?

kier321 #110 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 16:52

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15315 battles
  • 1,833
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012

View Posttrondd, on Dec 12 2016 - 10:38, said:

 

Whats that supposed to mean?

 

Sounds like me that the dudes an [edited]but that could be just my interpretation of that....

trondd #111 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:29

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14320 battles
  • 122
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View Postkier321, on Dec 12 2016 - 16:52, said:

 

Sounds like me that the dudes an [edited]but that could be just my interpretation of that....

 

There is no one I have played more with than him, and no, he has not been a [edited]to anyone ever.

kier321 #112 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:35

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15315 battles
  • 1,833
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012

View Posttrondd, on Dec 12 2016 - 14:29, said:

 

There is no one I have played more with than him, and no, he has not been a [edited]to anyone ever.

 

​Wow don't get all defensive. Wasn't me who made the comment, just my interpretation of what the guy meant... I could definitely be wrong about what the guy meant by his comment too

trondd #113 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:36

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14320 battles
  • 122
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View Postkier321, on Dec 12 2016 - 20:35, said:

 

​Wow don't get all defensive. Wasn't me who made the comment, just my interpretation of what the guy meant... I could definitely be wrong about what the guy meant by his comment too

 

I know. I was just stating for whoever made the comment, since I know the guy very well

Cocholatoso #114 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 22:32

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 16811 battles
  • 159
  • Member since:
    05-22-2016

View PostiWrangleEmus, on Dec 12 2016 - 08:03, said:

there should be 1650 personal licences because there are 1350 clan licences being used.

 

1349 licenses out of 1500 because the 15 top clans dont have 1500 players and... from that number the players with both fame license and clan license will be erased from the fame ranking thus releasing even more licenses, thats why the cutoff ended at 2169 which means from the 1651 licenses in the fame system we have 518 players who will be erased from that ranking because they get double license and the system will give em only the clan license, pushing the fame licenses from 1651 down to the player in the 2169 rank

Edited by Cocholatoso, Dec 12 2016 - 22:34.


Lickmygoat #115 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 22:45

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010


kier321 #116 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 00:31

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15315 battles
  • 1,833
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012

View PostLickmygoat, on Dec 12 2016 - 16:45, said:

 

​You seem butt hurt. How many threads you posted this on now, 5 or so? It was funny the first few, now you just look like an idiot spamming it




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users