Jump to content


Cheating


  • Please log in to reply
183 replies to this topic

liamcraig1245 #21 Posted Nov 24 2016 - 17:50

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29047 battles
  • 257
  • [LOAD] LOAD
  • Member since:
    02-23-2011
If wargaming didn't force double the amount of battles this campaign as any other campaign with two landing tournament opportunities at each hour this wouldn't happen because clans could manage their battles better. Unless a clan has 50 active each night it becomes nearly impossible to field 4 to 5 teams after winning 2 battles in a row. With the current set up of 32 applicants per landing this is really the only viable option for a clan to participate in the campaign without incurring crippling penalties. If I were to encounter an afk team I'd be happy to farm them for the free fame points.

NatalieMarsThePrincess #22 Posted Nov 25 2016 - 00:29

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21216 battles
  • 1,228
  • [NICO] NICO
  • Member since:
    07-29-2013

View PostMort, on Nov 23 2016 - 23:36, said:

  1. What is your definition of a "top clan"?

 

inb4 repub



Vornado #23 Posted Nov 25 2016 - 01:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 10290 battles
  • 2,037
  • [D-0-S] D-0-S
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View PostKelts, on Nov 23 2016 - 12:56, said:

We had a team of 8 players who were all not logged into the game and all their tanks blew up at the 0:00 mark. Basically they filled the team for no penalty then all loggeed out as the match started then logged into other accounts and played another battle at the same time. Love how top clans have to cheat/rig.

 

Does this fall under cheating? Not killing/firing upon enemy tanks, when its obvious that should be happening in normal play.

 

 

report mahou

mereelskirata #24 Posted Nov 26 2016 - 01:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 46560 battles
  • 2,457
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    01-27-2012

View PostMort, on Nov 23 2016 - 21:36, said:

 

  1. What is your definition of a "top clan"?

 

Anyone in the top 100 for WG's clan rating.



_Marine #25 Posted Nov 26 2016 - 06:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 27234 battles
  • 3,234
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View Postmereelskirata, on Nov 25 2016 - 19:45, said:

 

Anyone in the top 100 for WG's clan rating.

 

I was just going to say "Bulba" since they're the only good clan on this server :teethhappy:

IanSanJr #26 Posted Nov 26 2016 - 08:57

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 58132 battles
  • 672
  • [OTTER] OTTER
  • Member since:
    09-20-2011
i remember it was 404, they get in battle and left the game during battle (literally AFK in base spawn). 404 just focus other clan war priority (easy target) and leaving top clan beat 404 freely. they could not risk get penalty for no show up in battle (losing FP). their fault place division in LZ.

Bavor #27 Posted Nov 26 2016 - 16:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 27326 battles
  • 2,181
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

View Postmereelskirata, on Nov 25 2016 - 19:45, said:

Anyone in the top 100 for WG's clan rating.

 

I never understood why anyone would consider a top 100 clan a top clan.  There are some pretty awful clans in Wargaming's top 100 ratings.  In the old clan wars, the top 100 was filled with clans that struggled to win land or hold land in Greenland and the arctic circle.  In CW 2.0(Ebola) the top 100 has clans who do mostly tier 6 and tier 8 CW.  Top clan has always meant top 5 or top 10 to me.



GermanMade #28 Posted Nov 28 2016 - 16:50

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29950 battles
  • 1,482
  • [_-W-_] _-W-_
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012

View PostMort, on Nov 24 2016 - 00:36, said:

Two questions:

 

  1. How did you spend 15 minutes in a battle without realizing that your opponents were all AFK?
  2. What is your definition of a "top clan"?

 

1.   OP is referring to the 30 Sec count down at the beginning of the battle.   You know this and only trying to make OP look stupid.

 

2.    Top Clans:    PBKAC, OTTER...etc......



KING_Sam #29 Posted Nov 28 2016 - 17:36

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 19493 battles
  • 349
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

View PostGermanMade, on Nov 28 2016 - 15:50, said:

2.    Top Clans:    PBKAC, OTTER...etc......



Hellsfog #30 Posted Nov 28 2016 - 18:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 29794 battles
  • 3,499
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostGermanMade, on Nov 28 2016 - 10:50, said:

 

2.    Top Ded Clans:    PBKAC, OTTER...etc......

 



MNPickle #31 Posted Dec 04 2016 - 00:32

    Private

  • Players
  • 16475 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

Better than a tech victory where you get no points.



appendage #32 Posted Dec 04 2016 - 02:08

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 30845 battles
  • 55
  • [SZ] SZ
  • Member since:
    06-11-2013
HUH?

Kelts #33 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 01:00

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28063 battles
  • 158
  • [PRAV] PRAV
  • Member since:
    02-24-2014
Bwahahaha!! Finally some action!!  players got banned for this today and the clan lost 25% of their points!!!

Edited by Kelts, Dec 05 2016 - 01:44.


_Type_5_Heavy_ #34 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 02:45

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14616 battles
  • 111
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

What is sad, is you camped so Hard and failed to scout it that you drew it. That is sad. I wonder how you convince yourselves thats legit, it's quite sad.

Epic Fail, Drawing a battle against AFK tanks. 



Kelts #35 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 02:51

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28063 battles
  • 158
  • [PRAV] PRAV
  • Member since:
    02-24-2014

View Posteyempack, on Dec 04 2016 - 19:45, said:

What is sad, is you camped so Hard and failed to scout it that you drew it. That is sad. I wonder how you convince yourselves thats legit, it's quite sad.

Epic Fail, Drawing a battle against AFK tanks. 

 

What is sad is your clan manipulating the rules to avoid a penalty. How'd that work out for ya? :trollface:

Yu86 #36 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 02:53

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 17055 battles
  • 274
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    09-18-2012

View PostKelts, on Dec 05 2016 - 01:00, said:

Bwahahaha!! Finally some action!!  players got banned for this today and the clan lost 25% of their points!!!

 

So, did you get FP? 

 



_Type_5_Heavy_ #37 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 02:59

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14616 battles
  • 111
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

View PostKelts, on Dec 05 2016 - 01:51, said:

 

What is sad is your clan manipulating the rules to avoid a penalty. How'd that work out for ya? :trollface:

 

For me fine, it's not against the rules as posted. Hows your camping strat that draws against AFK tanks.

 

Did you get the FP you lost out on for camping so hard? Or have you dawn against more AFK teams?

 

Camp harder..Join Prav


Edited by eyempack, Dec 05 2016 - 03:00.


Yu86 #38 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:03

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 17055 battles
  • 274
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    09-18-2012

View Posteyempack, on Dec 05 2016 - 02:59, said:

 

For me fine, it's not against the rules as posted. Hows your camping strat that draws against AFK tanks.

 

Did you get the FP you lost out on for camping so hard? Or have you dawn against more AFK teams?

 

Camp harder..Join Prav

 

I wonder what his soldiers' thoughts after they found out what they just missed. 

_Type_5_Heavy_ #39 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:30

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14616 battles
  • 111
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

I couldn't imagine sitting in a CW battle for 15 min and not moving. Staring at the screen and having no engagement. 

 

Hey Kelts, whats that like?



Lickmygoat #40 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:50

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

Yea that has to be one of the following:

 

1) crappy caller who is too scared to push

2) crappy scouts

3) too many paint chips eaten when young

 

Ermagawddddd.....we tied because you didnt push.......






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users