Jump to content


Cheating


  • Please log in to reply
183 replies to this topic

Hellsfog #41 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 29716 battles
  • 3,465
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View Posteyempack, on Dec 04 2016 - 20:45, said:

What is sad, is you camped so Hard and failed to scout it that you drew it. That is sad. I wonder how you convince yourselves thats legit, it's quite sad.

Epic Fail, Drawing a battle against AFK tanks. 

 

I can't believe that anyone could be that bad. Truly. 



Lickmygoat #42 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:57

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010
Oh....believe it....and then they cried about it----even though they could have won

Lickmygoat #43 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:59

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010


Edge_of_Insanity #44 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 03:59

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14435 battles
  • 1,507
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2012

I mean, if you guys are bad enough to lose to yourself, is there really any cheating involved?

 

 

Here is a question for you: "If a team decided to go AFK, and the Opposing team is too bad to realize it, was the AFK team cheating?"

 


Edit: Out of curiosity what were you guys doing for 15 minutes? playing with yourself?


Edited by Edge_of_Insanity, Dec 05 2016 - 04:00.


Kelts #45 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:06

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27563 battles
  • 144
  • [PRAV] PRAV
  • Member since:
    02-24-2014
It was mountain pass for one and for two it doesnt matter . What matters is the 8 players got a 3 day ban and the clan lost 25% of their total FP and dropped almost 10 spots for the gold reward.

Hellsfog #46 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 29716 battles
  • 3,465
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostKelts, on Dec 04 2016 - 22:06, said:

It was mountain pass for one and for two it doesnt matter . What matters is the 8 players got a 3 day ban and the clan lost 25% of their total FP and dropped almost 10 spots for the gold reward.

 

What matters is that your bragging about your clan being so bad, you couldn't find or win a battle against an afk team. Truly, that is pretty bad. Good luck in the rest of the campaign.

Lickmygoat #47 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:13

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

View PostKelts, on Dec 04 2016 - 22:06, said:

It was mountain pass for one and for two it doesnt matter . What matters is the 8 players got a 3 day ban and the clan lost 25% of their total FP and dropped almost 10 spots for the gold reward.

 

All I see is tears.....filling the lovetub.

 



3rdguards #48 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:15

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 20282 battles
  • 159
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

I'm not one to defend Red Sky, because they been beatin my [edited]whole campaign :p

 

but GD that is dumb,

first off you lost to an AFK team

second off you took it to the forums

 

Rippity Bippity

Red Sky IMO doesn't deserve those bans nor the FP loss

 

 


Edited by 3rdguards, Dec 05 2016 - 04:25.


Kelts #49 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:25

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27563 battles
  • 144
  • [PRAV] PRAV
  • Member since:
    02-24-2014
What matters is its cheating and WG took action. Other clans should report these actions as cheats because they are!

Edited by Kelts, Dec 05 2016 - 04:26.


Kelts #50 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:28

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27563 battles
  • 144
  • [PRAV] PRAV
  • Member since:
    02-24-2014

View Post3rdguards, on Dec 04 2016 - 21:15, said:

I'm not one to defend Red Sky, because they been beatin my [edited]whole campaign :p

 

but GD that is dumb,

first off you lost to an AFK team

second off you took it to the forums

 

Rippity Bippity

Red Sky IMO doesn't deserve those bans nor the FP loss

 

 

 

Apparently your opinion doesnt matter only WG's. And I didn't name and shame I never said RS did anything. The OP started as a question of the rules and WG has made it clear what the rules are.

Edited by Kelts, Dec 05 2016 - 04:28.


cloudwalkr #51 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 49997 battles
  • 3,196
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

Can't beat AFK clan = cheating to a pubby...check.

 



_Type_5_Heavy_ #52 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:30

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14614 battles
  • 111
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

View PostKelts, on Dec 05 2016 - 03:25, said:

What matters is its cheating and WG took action. Other clans should report these actions as cheats because they are!

 

You are ignorant. You were given a win and failed to win vs inactive tanks. Thats the facts here.

 

You are now backtracking to to try and say "WG took Action". It's like a discussion vs a toddler.

 

Next time perhaps you'd be more butthurt if you lost vs 15 inactive tier 1's :)


Edited by eyempack, Dec 05 2016 - 04:30.


TrollStar #53 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:31

    Captain

  • Players
  • 37894 battles
  • 1,000
  • [GOONZ] GOONZ
  • Member since:
    03-05-2012
#FreeRedSky

Kelts #54 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:32

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27563 battles
  • 144
  • [PRAV] PRAV
  • Member since:
    02-24-2014

View Posteyempack, on Dec 04 2016 - 21:30, said:

 

You are ignorant. You were given a win and failed to win vs inactive tanks. Thats the facts here.

 

You are now backtracking to to try and say "WG took Action". It's like a discussion vs a toddler.

 

Next time perhaps you'd be more butthurt if you lost vs 15 inactive tier 1's :)

 

not my fault WG took a week for action. All I saw were your points gone and your 8 players banned.

cloudwalkr #55 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 49997 battles
  • 3,196
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

View PostKelts, on Nov 23 2016 - 18:56, said:

We had a team of 8 players who were all not logged into the game and all their tanks blew up at the 0:00 mark. Basically they filled the team for no penalty then all loggeed out as the match started then logged into other accounts and played another battle at the same time. Love how top clans have to cheat/rig.

 

Does this fall under cheating? Not killing/firing upon enemy tanks, when its obvious that should be happening in normal play.

 

 

This is seriously one of the most retarded things I've ever read on these forums.  In 5 years.  Ever.

 

 



Lickmygoat #56 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:54

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

The ban was because you cried----not because it was against the rules.

 

#participationtrophykids



Atlas32 #57 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:57

    Private

  • Players
  • 11420 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    09-24-2012

#FreeRedSky

 

In all honesty, you should be thanking RS for a free win. Even though you [edited] that up, they still gave it to you on a silver platter. You're the only one who could have benefited from that. 


Edited by Atlas32, Dec 05 2016 - 05:15.


cloudwalkr #58 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 04:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 49997 battles
  • 3,196
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

View PostLickmygoat, on Dec 05 2016 - 04:54, said:

The ban was because you cried----not because it was against the rules.

 

#participationtrophykids

 

If it wasn't considered a violation of some rule, the bans wouldn't have happened.  The fact that losing to an AFK team is considered cheating and or a rule violation is almost as retarded as PRAV is for losing to it

 



Frizzled07 #59 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 05:00

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 34768 battles
  • 335
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    02-02-2011

We didn't lose any fame points for that just a heads up, we took some penalties a week later... What we did isn't against the rules and there are 20-30 clans that have done it every campaign all the way back to when penalties were introduced.

 

What we did was not against the rules and the bans were given to players without even knowing what happened, very confident they will be overturned...


Edited by Frizzled07, Dec 05 2016 - 05:07.


Lickmygoat #60 Posted Dec 05 2016 - 05:00

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

The ban was for 'rigging clan wars' battles.......

 

But what actually happened is not a violation of the campaign rules.....

 

And WG support is M.I.A. as per normal......






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users