Jump to content


Ranking break down of the 5th Campaign


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

BoilerBandsman #21 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:14

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11354 battles
  • 1,133
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View Post_Marine, on Dec 12 2016 - 12:25, said:

Update

Posted Image

 

Are you hand compiling this or are you auto-pulling data from somewhere? I'd be curious to see the next 20 or so as well, but it's not worth it if it's not automated. 

THE_GOONS_R_COMMING_RUNN #22 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:24

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 992 battles
  • 259
  • [1V1ME] 1V1ME
  • Member since:
    08-29-2013
I bet some SIMP players got upset when almost half of the active participants didn't get the tank. 70>45 is a little to much confidence in that mark.

_Marine #23 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 27191 battles
  • 3,228
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostBoilerBandsman, on Dec 12 2016 - 14:14, said:

 

Are you hand compiling this or are you auto-pulling data from somewhere? I'd be curious to see the next 20 or so as well, but it's not worth it if it's not automated. 

 

I have to manually pull a lot of the raw data either from WG or from Clan Tools

Pounced #24 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:29

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17929 battles
  • 116
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
Thanks for putting all this information together. 

Frostii_xD #25 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:30

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 21748 battles
  • 269
  • [CHAI] CHAI
  • Member since:
    07-14-2012
I like the efficiency calculation. Top marks.

_Marine #26 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 20:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 27191 battles
  • 3,228
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

Ranking Gold earned per Battle
Posted Image

 

Ranking Efficiency Per Tank Earned
Posted Image

 

 



Lickmygoat #27 Posted Dec 12 2016 - 22:47

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19010 battles
  • 31
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010


TRU_voodoo #28 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 00:50

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 18846 battles
  • 102
  • [MAHOU] MAHOU
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View PostN00BSAIB0T, on Dec 12 2016 - 17:53, said:

4K and Claws with 1,000+ battles each. I wonder how many battles their players at the top had to fight in.

 

Rel2 also finished on 975 battles but they were outside the top 20.

TRU_voodoo #29 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 00:51

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 18846 battles
  • 102
  • [MAHOU] MAHOU
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View PostLickmygoat, on Dec 12 2016 - 22:47, said:

 

I heard about this...lol

cloudwalkr #30 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 01:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 49997 battles
  • 3,196
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011
Jesus christ BULBA...

susstheman #31 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 01:10

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19305 battles
  • 13
  • [QSSF] QSSF
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013
I proud of the fact that a 2 week old clan when the campaign started got 18 people tanks(says 14 b/c we kicked 4) and got 31.5k gold. was pretty much just 15-20 of us doing everything aswell, meme clan is best clan (afk strat best strat)

Edited by susstheman, Dec 13 2016 - 01:12.


cloudwalkr #32 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 01:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 49997 battles
  • 3,196
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

In all honesty here, i think the break out clan was 4K.   They put in the effort, won games against clans that they probably should have lost to, and made the right moves.  Even though they carried one of the lower w/r of the top 15, they still managed to pull it out and did well. 

 

Good job -4K-.



Frostii_xD #33 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 01:55

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 21748 battles
  • 269
  • [CHAI] CHAI
  • Member since:
    07-14-2012

View Postcloudwalkr, on Dec 12 2016 - 16:16, said:

In all honesty here, i think the break out clan was 4K.   They put in the effort, won games against clans that they probably should have lost to, and made the right moves.  Even though they carried one of the lower w/r of the top 15, they still managed to pull it out and did well. 

 

Good job -4K-.

 

4K proved you just need to spam enough battles with decent tier 6 and tier 8 play to get top 15. We need to have tier 10 only campaign as the reward is tier 10 tonk! Tier 6 campaign for tier 6 tonk. That is what they should've done.

CranKextreme #34 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 02:21

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 25277 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    07-28-2014
4k was highly benefited by the disband of 404, they got around 20 players most of them above the clan average a few shotcallers between them also

Fulcrous #35 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 02:29

    Major

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 26983 battles
  • 4,020
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostBoilerBandsman, on Dec 12 2016 - 09:00, said:

I'm mildly impressed that someone outspammed CLAWS in a campaign. 

Difference of 80k fame though



ToFuSmurF #36 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 02:30

    Captain

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 32314 battles
  • 1,086
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011
I couldn't of been the only one seeing how many games Big Guns 006 could rack up was I?

cloudwalkr #37 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 06:08

    Major

  • Players
  • 49997 battles
  • 3,196
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

View PostFrostii_xD, on Dec 13 2016 - 01:55, said:

 

4K proved you just need to spam enough battles with decent tier 6 and tier 8 play to get top 15. We need to have tier 10 only campaign as the reward is tier 10 tonk! Tier 6 campaign for tier 6 tonk. That is what they should've done.

 

Other clans spammed just as much with less success.  All things considered, i think -4K- finished well above other clans of the same level.  (maybe other clans didn't spam quite as much, but still....)

 

On a personal note, i agree that campaigns should be tier X.  At the very least they should only be tier 8 and X.  Get rid of that tier 6 crap that's not even relevant in the end.



Hellsfog #38 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 06:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 29716 battles
  • 3,465
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostTRU_voodoo, on Dec 12 2016 - 18:50, said:

 

Rel2 also finished on 975 battles but they were outside the top 20.

 

We had a penalty for no shows so yeah thanks for being ignorant.

Edited by Hellsfog, Dec 13 2016 - 06:27.


Jeffe_ #39 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 06:29

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 13938 battles
  • 355
  • [MAHOU] MAHOU
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
What tank should I get

Edge_of_Insanity #40 Posted Dec 13 2016 - 08:33

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14435 battles
  • 1,507
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2012

View PostTRU_voodoo, on Dec 12 2016 - 18:50, said:

 

Rel2 also finished on 975 battles but they were outside the top 20.

 

Did I miss where we were considered relevant? Also, we kicked your asses all over the campaign map. Maybe you remember this battle? FYI remind your STB's not to sit still for so long, they are going to get hit by arty if they do that.

 

No? Thats a shame...

 

Also, isn't _R2_ the guy that when we wardec'ed his clan, CR/D got together and trolled him into changing his name and leaving his clan Mug_G of which he was the commander of?

 

Edit: just checked. Its him, tell him REL2 says hi!

URL for those who want to read--->  http://forum.worldof...67#entry9931767






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users