No one is denying that pal but this game does not revolve around the top 25 or top 50 clans in game it revolves around a player base which is all who play this game Ive been in top 25 clans and i still disagree with their Tactics. For example the last campaign clans could win a landing take provinces and still drop on landings in every time zone that is not a good or fair structure to any clan if you disagree your a moron. Wargaming has absolutely ruined this game for a majority of their player base that is a fact and it is ruining this game for themselves for the future. If you think catering to the top 50 clans in this game will impress their player base and a majority of their income you watch this game die off like the rest of their games.
I'm not sure what you are trying to suggest here. Anything clan wars related will inherently have clans involved in it. The "Top 50" are those that are the best at Clan Wars currently. Wargaming could change clan wars drastically so that the criteria to be good at Clan Wars would be far different and the current "Top 50" wouldn't have them however, there would still be a top 50 group of clans etc. Now you complain that a small part of Wargaming that works on clan wars makes changes and say they do not represent the majority of the player base. Well the truth is that Clan Wars was never meant to represent the majority of the player base. I believe Wargaming makes Clan Wars cater to the clans with the best players alongside the most active players. This is because Clan Wars is meant to be an outlet for those that want to have the highest level of 15 vs. 15 competition. Making Clan Wars anything else would be out of sync with what Clan Wars has been for the past 6ish years