Jump to content


fury is 4 tons heavier, what gives?


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

QuicksilverJPR #61 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 01:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 27894 battles
  • 4,790
  • [RPG] RPG
  • Member since:
    01-17-2013

View PostBulletFarmer, on Dec 21 2016 - 18:40, said:

 

no its not. do the math

 

I did the math.  Look at what he posted.

 

8,000kg

 

A kg weighs 2.2 pounds.

 

A ton is 2,000 pounds.

 

You go back to school as well.

 

 



otacon237 #62 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 01:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 25222 battles
  • 4,370
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012

View PostQuicksilverJPR, on Dec 22 2016 - 00:09, said:

 

I did the math.  Look at what he posted.

 

8,000kg

 

A kg weighs 2.2 pounds.

 

A ton is 2,000 pounds.

 

You go back to school as well.

 

 

 

​the tank does weigh 4 metric tons more.

 

http://tanks.gg/wot/compare#t:fury.c:m4a3e8

 

so my title was correct, i just mistyped the post. it's fixed now. happy?

 

in any case it's a crapton of unexplained weight.


Edited by otacon237, Dec 22 2016 - 01:13.


QuicksilverJPR #63 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 01:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 27894 battles
  • 4,790
  • [RPG] RPG
  • Member since:
    01-17-2013

View Postotacon237, on Dec 21 2016 - 19:11, said:

 

​the tank does weigh 4 metric tons more.

 

http://tanks.gg/wot/compare#t:fury.c:m4a3e8

 

so my title was correct, i just mistyped the post. it's fixed now. happy?

 

in any case it's a crapton of unexplained weight.

 

I've been happy the entire time.

 

I just like folks that have no idea how to do simple math (like the dude I quoted above you)  :)



otacon237 #64 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 01:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 25222 battles
  • 4,370
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012

View PostQuicksilverJPR, on Dec 22 2016 - 00:20, said:

 

I've been happy the entire time.

 

I just like folks that have no idea how to do simple math (like the dude I quoted above you)  :)

 

​or some folks just mistype when making a quick post on their phone while waiting in line for food at work. glad you're perfect though.

QuicksilverJPR #65 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 01:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 27894 battles
  • 4,790
  • [RPG] RPG
  • Member since:
    01-17-2013

View Postotacon237, on Dec 21 2016 - 19:33, said:

 

​or some folks just mistype when making a quick post on their phone while waiting in line for food at work. glad you're perfect though.

 

Evidently your sarcasm meter is broken.  I used a smiley and everything...

An_Innocent_Bystander #66 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 02:29

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 10933 battles
  • 3,734
  • [HBC] HBC
  • Member since:
    05-09-2015

View PostQuicksilverJPR, on Dec 22 2016 - 01:44, said:

 

Evidently your sarcasm meter is broken.  I used a smiley and everything...

Sarcasm translates extremely well through text.



PD4_Banana_Fish #67 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 19:08

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21752 battles
  • 1,520
  • Member since:
    06-22-2013

View PostAn_Innocent_Bystander, on Dec 22 2016 - 02:29, said:

Sarcasm translates extremely well through text.

 

No it doesn't.

An_Innocent_Bystander #68 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 20:42

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 10933 battles
  • 3,734
  • [HBC] HBC
  • Member since:
    05-09-2015

View PostBulletFarmer, on Dec 22 2016 - 19:08, said:

 

No it doesn't.

:facepalm:



Dain_Ironfoot_ #69 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 20:46

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 27308 battles
  • 2,530
  • [4HIM] 4HIM
  • Member since:
    05-14-2014
Honestly, this tank needs fixed.  It's not bad but it should be at least as good as the E8, if not better.  Either that or have "War Daddy" give the tank some special abilities, heh.

otacon237 #70 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 21:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 25222 battles
  • 4,370
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012

View PostThrain_Ironsword, on Dec 22 2016 - 19:46, said:

Honestly, this tank needs fixed.  It's not bad but it should be at least as good as the E8, if not better.  Either that or have "War Daddy" give the tank some special abilities, heh.

 

​honestly I think it should have a BIA crew BC the whole point of the movie was how they were all tight knit until the new guy arrived and then they had to accept him. But yes I agree it should be as good as the e8.

Casual_Boops #71 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 21:57

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 37395 battles
  • 1,715
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    05-14-2015

View PostAn_Innocent_Bystander, on Dec 20 2016 - 12:31, said:

My question is why buy a Fury in the first place.

 

Because this way I can play what's basically an E8 while training my OG US med crew and not having to train a new one specially for the E8.

Casual_Boops #72 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 22:01

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 37395 battles
  • 1,715
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    05-14-2015

View PostCedricMacLaren, on Dec 20 2016 - 19:02, said:

 

At the time it was the only true American MT premium which you could use to learn Mid tier MT play and earn extra XP and credits. The free camo was nice too.

 

The Ram II is great, but has a different crew and is T5.  It is also Canadian. The SP is not a true MT either.  

 

The Ram II, Fury, SuperP, M4 Improved and Patton KR [as well as the T23E3] all have the 5-man crew layout that every tank in the US medium line from Tier 5 up to tier 9 have. Tier 10 is the c-c-c-combo breaker with a 4-man crew, which gets trained by a T95E2 and the M60.

deadizdead #73 Posted Dec 22 2016 - 22:26

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 41114 battles
  • 535
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
Its the not so easy eight...

PD4_Banana_Fish #74 Posted Jan 03 2017 - 18:32

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21752 battles
  • 1,520
  • Member since:
    06-22-2013

View PostBulletFarmer, on Dec 22 2016 - 19:08, said:

 

No it doesn't.

 

Yes it does

Gohibniu #75 Posted Jan 03 2017 - 19:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 81107 battles
  • 5,701
  • [T57] T57
  • Member since:
    11-17-2011
Brad Pitts wallet.

Rain_Twister #76 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 13:01

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11010 battles
  • 136
  • [DUD] DUD
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostAn_Innocent_Bystander, on Dec 20 2016 - 13:37, said:

Because when Fury was released WG still thought prem tanks shouldn't be as good as their standard counterparts and weren't releasing blatantly OP tanks like the T26E5.

 

I beg your pardon?! Have you not played the Super Pershing. Take a Jag Pnz E100 and shoot that T26E5 and tell me if it bounces that shot! I bounced 3 of them in my T26E4! OP my metal [edited].

An_Innocent_Bystander #77 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 13:06

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 10933 battles
  • 3,734
  • [HBC] HBC
  • Member since:
    05-09-2015

View PostRain_Twister, on Jan 04 2017 - 13:01, said:

 

I beg your pardon?! Have you not played the Super Pershing. Take a Jag Pnz E100 and shoot that T26E5 and tell me if it bounces that shot! I bounced 3 of them in my T26E4! OP my metal [edited].

There is a difference between the luck of bouncing a braindead JPE100 in a SuperP and the fact that the T26E5 is literally better in most ways than most tier 8 heavies and equally good in the areas it isn't.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users