Jump to content


Only bad tanks available for ingame purchase?


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

ktalex #1 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 00:47

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 34074 battles
  • 590
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
I was looking at all the in game premium tanks and noticed that they all suck, or at least aren't as good as the ones you can purchase with cash. Any idea when we will get something that hasn't been there for 5 updates?

Edited by ktalex, Jan 04 2017 - 00:49.


driesp #2 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 00:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 31571 battles
  • 2,424
  • Member since:
    07-14-2012
WoT is "pay to play".

panzerkampfwagen9991 #3 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 00:54

    Captain

  • Players
  • 28392 battles
  • 1,645
  • [QUACK] QUACK
  • Member since:
    11-21-2013
Lot of them received buffs too though....

galspanic #4 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 01:07

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 24502 battles
  • 3,938
  • Member since:
    01-06-2016
There are some good tanks in there.  Just because they are older and have lost their sheen doesn't mean they are crap.

Cruiser133 #5 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 01:08

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36013 battles
  • 590
  • [SEGA] SEGA
  • Member since:
    05-28-2013
Do yourself a favor and buy a Rev. Play it like a hellcat and farm damage like a boss.

panzerkampfwagen9991 #6 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 01:31

    Captain

  • Players
  • 28392 battles
  • 1,645
  • [QUACK] QUACK
  • Member since:
    11-21-2013

View PostCruiser133, on Jan 04 2017 - 01:08, said:

Do yourself a favor and buy a Rev. Play it like a hellcat and farm damage like a boss.

 

Yeah, the rev is good fun

ff8ff8 #7 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 01:31

    Captain

  • Players
  • 18654 battles
  • 1,227
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    05-24-2012
Type 64 is available in game for gold.
It is probably the most useful premium tank in the game right now because of the credit farming potential in strongholds.

Pop a credit boner and that thing makes about 1.5 mil credits per hour profit. With zero thought process attached.

Byracki #8 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 01:58

    Captain

  • Players
  • 33778 battles
  • 1,064
  • Member since:
    08-05-2013

View Postktalex, on Jan 03 2017 - 23:47, said:

I was looking at all the in game premium tanks and noticed that they all suck, or at least aren't as good as the ones you can purchase with cash. Any idea when we will get something that hasn't been there for 5 updates?

The only ones (of 7-8 tiers) that I would say suck is the Panther 8,8 and the AT15A....

The AT15A cuz yuck British TD and the Panther 8,8 cuz it is terrible.

 

Every other tank has the usual high points and low points, but they are all workable and make great trainers/credit earners.

 

However, I feel what you are saying. People see a platoon of FCMs and no one cares, but people see a toon of T26E5, a toon of Skorpian Gs, or even a toon of E25 and everyone loses their minds and cries OVERPOWERED!

 

I do agree though that it would be nice if WG would add some into the tech tree.

 

View Postpanzerkampfwagen9991, on Jan 03 2017 - 23:54, said:

Lot of them received buffs too though....

Very VERY good buffs on a few.

Panther 8,8 got jack crap.

WZ-111 is now almost god level.

STA-2 was already one of my favorites, now it is 10 kph faster.

M4A1 has much better gun depression.

etc etc

 

View Postff8ff8, on Jan 04 2017 - 00:31, said:

Type 64 is available in game for gold.
It is probably the most useful premium tank in the game right now because of the credit farming potential in strongholds.

Pop a credit boner and that thing makes about 1.5 mil credits per hour profit. With zero thought process attached.

 

Love my 64 for SH.

Lots of the tier 6s are stronghold ready (some more than others of course)

 

Strv m/42-57 (Autoloader)

Type 64 (Super Scout)

Skoda T40 (Heavy gun, medium tank)

 

SU-100Y and Dicker Max are fun for pubs, but crap for SH cuz low mobility.

HT No. VI is crap for anything, period



KanataKonoe #9 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 02:00

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 30175 battles
  • 2,318
  • [-L-L-] -L-L-
  • Member since:
    06-09-2015
They don't all suck. 

driesp #10 Posted Jan 04 2017 - 04:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 31571 battles
  • 2,424
  • Member since:
    07-14-2012

View PostSenaKashiwazaki, on Jan 04 2017 - 09:00, said:

They don't all suck

 

Wargaming should use that in their advertisement campaign....




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users