Jump to content


Rumoured Canadian Tech Tree?


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

roestreyev #21 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:17

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 21970 battles
  • 148
  • [SKORP] SKORP
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View Post_T4nk_Wr3ck3r_72, on Jan 23 2017 - 21:31, said:

Bad idea since they would just run and hide. :izmena:

 

Besides they just used our tanks for the most part did they not? Everyone else did.

 

TIER l  got my humor for the day haha

 

 

 

wrong color for RCMP...

CapturedJoe #22 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:18

    Captain

  • Players
  • 4214 battles
  • 1,907
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013
Isn't that actually a Swedish mounted liveguard trooper?

Burning_Haggis #23 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:21

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 38466 battles
  • 807
  • [-BTU-] -BTU-
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

View PostDockmaster, on Jan 23 2017 - 14:32, said:

They have the exclusive Canadian designed and operated Ram II.

 

To create a Canadian tech tree would just parallel existing US and Brit tanks. We have enough duplication in the game as it is.

 

Even as a Canadian I would say" I am sorry, but  NO, EH?" 

 

 

 

Fixed it for you

 



spacecubicnub #24 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:22

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 17509 battles
  • 392
  • [TBOOM] TBOOM
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View Post_T4nk_Wr3ck3r_72, on Jan 23 2017 - 21:31, said:

Bad idea since they would just run and hide. :izmena:

 

Besides they just used our tanks for the most part did they not? Everyone else did.

 

TIER l  got my humor for the day haha

 

 

Name the only country to defeat America in a war....

Know your history :-)

 



PrinzEugen85 #25 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:24

    Captain

  • Players
  • 30524 battles
  • 1,877
  • [CANIS] CANIS
  • Member since:
    10-14-2013

View Post_T4nk_Wr3ck3r_72, on Jan 23 2017 - 21:45, said:

 

experience nuff said

 

What, like Canada holding the fort in Afghanistan, while the US went to Iraq?

CapturedJoe #26 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:25

    Captain

  • Players
  • 4214 battles
  • 1,907
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostCapturedJoe, on Jan 23 2017 - 22:18, said:

Isn't that actually a Swedish mounted liveguard trooper?

 

Just looked it up, indeed it is a Swede.

roestreyev #27 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:25

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 21970 battles
  • 148
  • [SKORP] SKORP
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View PostDAGMARK, on Jan 23 2017 - 22:13, said:

With bacon as a consumable

 

LOL for sure!

View PostKarl__Childers, on Jan 23 2017 - 22:00, said:

 

He must have thinking about "French Canadians" :trollface:

 

Les Canadiens Français t'envoie chier...

 

I bet you don't know that a WOT medal is named after a French Canadian from Gaspé?

 

 



CapturedJoe #28 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:27

    Captain

  • Players
  • 4214 battles
  • 1,907
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View Postspacecubicnub, on Jan 23 2017 - 22:22, said:

Name the only country to defeat America in a war....

Know your history :-)

 

 

Not Canada, since it wasn't a country back then.

MMI_SPI #29 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:41

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14373 battles
  • 132
  • [SNS-A] SNS-A
  • Member since:
    01-16-2014

View PostCasey_Helmeczi, on Jan 23 2017 - 15:32, said:

 

Honestly don't know whether you are kidding or not, Wargaming hates to double up tanks like that, there was a lot of friction about the Type 58 and Type T-34 because they were so similar to their Soviet counterparts, WG almost didn't put them in the game, if it was a joke, well...lol I guess.

 

EDIT: Even though players will argue that they play differently and such, they are still very similar.

 

*looks at IS-2 Berlin, IS-6 Black, T-34 Black, Skoda T-25, IS-3A, IS-5...

Yeah, like WG ACTUALLY hates to put out tanks that are copies or similar :sceptic:



Littleholyterror #30 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:42

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 6154 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    01-22-2016

View PostDAGMARK, on Jan 23 2017 - 22:13, said:

With bacon as a consumable

 

A big plus 1 for this

Vampiresbane #31 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 22:49

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20794 battles
  • 775
  • [MEDIC] MEDIC
  • Member since:
    06-27-2011

View PostDAGMARK, on Jan 23 2017 - 21:13, said:

With bacon as a consumable

 

and Maple Syrup.

Benjeeh_CA #32 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 23:00

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 27886 battles
  • 399
  • [DBLTP] DBLTP
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

As a proud canadian, no we don't need to go through this

They are all duplicates we don't need at least other lines aren't entirely duplicate content 



Hochtaloughie #33 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 23:04

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 22910 battles
  • 437
  • Member since:
    11-07-2011

View Post_T4nk_Wr3ck3r_72, on Jan 23 2017 - 13:31, said:

Bad idea since they would just run and hide. :izmena:

 

Besides they just used our tanks for the most part did they not? Everyone else did.

 

TIER l  got my humor for the day haha

 

 

 

 

Never heard of Radley Walters, I guess (or that it was more likely that a tank from Radley Walter's squadron bagged Michael Wittman rather than Ekins almost a mile further away).



Dockmaster #34 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 23:16

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 39723 battles
  • 4,289
  • [ACES] ACES
  • Member since:
    01-23-2011

View PostBurning_Haggis, on Jan 23 2017 - 14:21, said:

 

Fixed it for you

 

 

I got a great Scottish vrs English joke....but I'm trying to avoid warnings.

moon111 #35 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 23:42

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24660 battles
  • 1,471
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013

View PostPrinzEugen85, on Jan 23 2017 - 21:24, said:

 

What, like Canada holding the fort in Afghanistan, while the US went to Iraq?

 

I think more Canadians have been killed by American incompetence friendly-fire accidents then from terrorists.  

moon111 #36 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 23:49

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24660 battles
  • 1,471
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013

View Post_T4nk_Wr3ck3r_72, on Jan 23 2017 - 20:31, said:

Bad idea since they would just run and hide. :izmena:

 

Besides they just used our tanks for the most part did they not? Everyone else did.

 

TIER l  got my humor for the day haha

 

 

 

Do you forget Italy?  Where the Canadians were smashing the Germans and had them on the run?  The Americans were suppose to cut off the retreating forces.  Instead of getting their hands dirty, they went into Rome which was completely empty of enemy troops instead.  The Canadians had to walk right by the cowards and press on.  It's estimated the American cowardice doubled the Allied casualties in the next few months.  Of course in the U.S., the American troops were labelled heroes for liberating an empty city.  

Red_Ensign #37 Posted Jan 23 2017 - 23:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 5988 battles
  • 5,429
  • Member since:
    02-14-2013

View Postspacecubicnub, on Jan 23 2017 - 15:22, said:

Name the only country to defeat America in a war....

Know your history :-)

 

 

you mean besides north vietnam?

 

 



PrinzEugen85 #38 Posted Jan 24 2017 - 02:06

    Captain

  • Players
  • 30524 battles
  • 1,877
  • [CANIS] CANIS
  • Member since:
    10-14-2013

View PostRed_Ensign, on Jan 23 2017 - 23:52, said:

 

you mean besides north vietnam?

 

 

 

And Korea. And Iraq. And Afganistan. To be fair though, HW Bush had the old Gulf War military clean house and withdraw from Baghdad before it turned into Sniper City.

PrimarchRogalDorn #39 Posted Jan 24 2017 - 02:39

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 25 battles
  • 362
  • Member since:
    01-03-2017

View PostPrinzEugen85, on Jan 23 2017 - 20:06, said:

 

And Korea. And Iraq. And Afganistan. To be fair though, HW Bush had the old Gulf War military clean house and withdraw from Baghdad before it turned into Sniper City.

 

Korea was effectively a decisive UN victory. It was the Chinese that caused the war to end like it did.

ExclamationMarx #40 Posted Jan 24 2017 - 12:45

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 1595 battles
  • 509
  • [E-T-D] E-T-D
  • Member since:
    12-25-2015

View PostMMI_SPI, on Jan 23 2017 - 16:41, said:

 

*looks at IS-2 Berlin, IS-6 Black, T-34 Black, Skoda T-25, IS-3A, IS-5...

Yeah, like WG ACTUALLY hates to put out tanks that are copies or similar :sceptic:

 

lol, that's cause they are Russian tier 8 premium heavy tanks, we have to have every single one of them, as well as the black versions, soviet flag versions, WG anniversary editions, etc.  :P




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users