Jump to content


Quiting wot if rng gets worse poll

Quit wot if rng gets worse?

  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

Poll: Will you quit wot if rng is made worse (87 members have cast votes)

Will you continue to play wot if rng is made worse?

  1. No i will not continue playing , shooting dirt is not fun!!!!!! (38 votes [43.68%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 43.68%

  2. Yes I like missing all my fully aimed shots on stationary tanks 100 meters away!!!! (49 votes [56.32%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 56.32%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Dogg_zilla #61 Posted May 13 2017 - 02:30

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 7123 battles
  • 400
  • Member since:
    03-07-2015

View PostThisDictatorEU, on Jan 26 2017 - 20:39, said:

Why keep complaining? Save your breath and migrate to

 

 

If it was up to people like you, this game would still have hordes of T59s raping half the map like Genghis Khan. 

 

Complaints are how things get better. 

 

All the people who cant handle complaints come from the states where nothing ever gets improved and 80% of people are living in trailer parks. 

 

 

 

 



Dogg_zilla #62 Posted May 13 2017 - 16:46

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 7123 battles
  • 400
  • Member since:
    03-07-2015

Seriously, the RNG in this game is [edited]cancer. 

 

Its absolutely infuriating to be getting shot apart and your gun just decides to randomly throw the round like 5 degrees outside the aiming reticle. 

 

Someone would have to be on drugs or retarded to think its okay to put inaccuracy on top of inaccuracy. 

 

A tank with an already inaccurate gun does not need the rounds to be even less accurate. 

 

Seriously, does wargaming think we are going to continue PAYING if the game is infuriating? 

 

 



leeuniverse #63 Posted May 13 2017 - 20:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 27500 battles
  • 6,598
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

This poll is late.....  I already did quit a year ago because of the Physics RNG added to the game, making tanks drive like crap and slower.

I only came back briefly because of frustration with AW and waiting for their "Balance 2.0".

 

I'm now gone from both games.



UnDeadDemon956 #64 Posted May 14 2017 - 18:40

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25536 battles
  • 248
  • [BIBO] BIBO
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
bump

Badkarma #65 Posted May 14 2017 - 18:42

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 27455 battles
  • 779
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View Postleeuniverse, on May 13 2017 - 20:49, said:

This poll is late.....  I already did quit a year ago because of the Physics RNG added to the game, making tanks drive like crap and slower.

I only came back briefly because of frustration with AW and waiting for their "Balance 2.0".

 

I'm now gone from both games.

Now if you could just be gone from the forums...If you don't play why hang around here?



diego999 #66 Posted May 14 2017 - 18:51

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 27936 battles
  • 4,108
  • [ACA] ACA
  • Member since:
    11-22-2010

View PostBadkarma, on May 14 2017 - 14:42, said:

Now if you could just be gone from the forums...If you don't play why hang around here?

 

They despise him on the AW forums just as much as we do. He's that dense.

dunniteowl #67 Posted May 14 2017 - 21:03

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 15447 battles
  • 1,969
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

Poll is biased to provide nothing more than sarcasm as answers.  Couldn't vote.

 

Also, haven't heard anything about change to the RNG of +/- 25%.  Citation please so I can properly discuss?

Is RNG variable on your system more so than mine?


 

GL, HF & HSYBF



ThE_MarD #68 Posted May 14 2017 - 21:28

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15972 battles
  • 723
  • [TBR] TBR
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Heyyo, hmm Counter-Strike has RNG in the aim but predictable patterns (at least to a degree) and it's accepted... WoT has some RNG which was reduced quite a while back from original RNG and people cry... yep, life is hard.

leeuniverse #69 Posted May 15 2017 - 00:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 27500 battles
  • 6,598
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

View Postdiego999, on May 14 2017 - 10:51, said:

They despise him on the AW forums just as much as we do. He's that dense.

 

Actually that's false....  There were only like 8 people on that forum that "despised" me, and most of them were WOT fanboy's, Arty Haters, and Stat Bully Unicorns.  Most everyone else like me because AW was a game that does much of what I've been trying to get Wargaming to do.

 

Further, you people deal in personal attacks, not intelligence and solutions to problems, which shows who's the actual "dense" around here.



UnDeadDemon956 #70 Posted May 15 2017 - 22:24

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25536 battles
  • 248
  • [BIBO] BIBO
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
bump

ACandieCaneKilling #71 Posted May 16 2017 - 15:11

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 42501 battles
  • 881
  • [TRIO] TRIO
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

Can you say... This poll backfired?? lolol

I think it is you who want the game itself to be catered to your likes & dislikes when reality dictates that when the game isn't yours, you may express your opinion, but it doesn't make it correct, legitimate or right.

I do not share your way of thinking here at all, it is NOT a FPS game, it is a tactical team oriented & strategically challenging think-your-way-out-of-a-situation game where players interact with one another to defeat a common enemy. It takes forethought, insight & the ability to work with others, etc. Since when did this become something else to you?

 

When ever a player begins to complain about the direction of the game, I have to wonder why you continue to want the premise to the game changed to suit your likes & dislikes?

It's like those who complain about arty. The game is based around the arty being the backbone support of your team, a tool for everyone to use to help defeat the enemy.

The idea that WoT is going to remove part of the original premise cause you don't like it or you want the game to become something else entirely isn't relevant to anything.

 

Analogy: You drive an off the showroom floor factory luxury car from a dealership. mmmm nice car.

However, you complain when you take it to the track.

You believe they need to change the engine, trans, wheels, tires & brakes so you can race the care off road, after declaring it a rally car, when its not a race car by any means.

Do you really think the factory is going to change their entire strategy on your opinion?



Aranai #72 Posted May 16 2017 - 17:20

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 3829 battles
  • 67
  • [FURST] FURST
  • Member since:
    08-06-2013

View PostUnDeadDemon956, on Jan 26 2017 - 18:30, said:

As the title reads, will you quit world of tanks if RNG is made more inaccurate. I know I will be, never have I played a competitive shooter that punishes you for aiming your shots.

 

You called world of tanks a shooter? WOW!!!!!
GG WP to you sir after 25,000 games.

Aranai #73 Posted May 16 2017 - 17:21

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 3829 battles
  • 67
  • [FURST] FURST
  • Member since:
    08-06-2013

View PostDogg_zilla, on May 13 2017 - 16:46, said:

Seriously, the RNG in this game is [edited]cancer. 

 

Its absolutely infuriating to be getting shot apart and your gun just decides to randomly throw the round like 5 degrees outside the aiming reticle. 

 

Someone would have to be on drugs or retarded to think its okay to put inaccuracy on top of inaccuracy. 

 

A tank with an already inaccurate gun does not need the rounds to be even less accurate. 

 

Seriously, does wargaming think we are going to continue PAYING if the game is infuriating? 

 

 

 

The RNG is what makes things like angling and surviving potentially even a thing.

Aranai #74 Posted May 16 2017 - 17:22

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 3829 battles
  • 67
  • [FURST] FURST
  • Member since:
    08-06-2013

View PostUnDeadDemon956, on Jan 26 2017 - 18:40, said:

 

​It's competitive and you shoot = competitive shooter, logic hard.

 

Not competitive shooter, you are missing the genre points and are sounding like a 13 year old CS GO player. I thought this was clear earlier but I guess not.

Nunya_000 #75 Posted May 16 2017 - 17:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 20411 battles
  • 8,622
  • [PACNW] PACNW
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

View PostUnDeadDemon956, on Jan 26 2017 - 09:40, said:

 

​It's competitive and you shoot = competitive shooter, logic hard.

 

Let's see what Spock thinks of your logic:

 



Poitou_Donkey #76 Posted May 16 2017 - 23:04

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 18221 battles
  • 82
  • [PGHS] PGHS
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
Is it possible the RNG is an answer to the Aimbots and essentially admitting they have no way to combat/remove them other then making everyone horribly inaccurate. Unfortunately when you deep six accuracy everyone will start running in fast light derpy tanks and WOT starts looking like a prison cell knife fight.

yereverluvinunclebert #77 Posted May 17 2017 - 15:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 16582 battles
  • 2,953
  • Member since:
    12-19-2012

Most of us never actually quit, ie. close the account. Instead we simply play one fiftieth as often as we used to. I  play WoT for a week and then almost always abandon it for three months, then to return for another week. I remind myself how awful the MAtchmaker is, how bad the faults are, I play for a while until I can't handle it anymore.

 

Oh, yes. I also pay not a penny towards WG's coffers any more as they deserve nothing from me.

 

Strange this as I can easily state that WoT is my favourite game. I love it but I just can't play it as it is so bloody awful.



UnDeadDemon956 #78 Posted May 19 2017 - 00:27

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25536 battles
  • 248
  • [BIBO] BIBO
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
bump

UnDeadDemon956 #79 Posted May 19 2017 - 01:58

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25536 battles
  • 248
  • [BIBO] BIBO
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013

View Postdunniteowl, on May 14 2017 - 15:03, said:

Poll is biased to provide nothing more than sarcasm as answers.  Couldn't vote.

 

Also, haven't heard anything about change to the RNG of +/- 25%.  Citation please so I can properly discuss?

Is RNG variable on your system more so than mine?


 

GL, HF & HSYBF

 

Poll isn't biased i will explain the voting options, if you select yes (  it means you support current rng system ). And if you select no (that means you do not support the current rng system and want a change).

UnDeadDemon956 #80 Posted May 19 2017 - 01:59

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25536 battles
  • 248
  • [BIBO] BIBO
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
bump

Edited by UnDeadDemon956, May 19 2017 - 02:00.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users