Jump to content


Object 252U Premium Review


  • Please log in to reply
100 replies to this topic

_Bagheera_ #21 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 19:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 40135 battles
  • 5,814
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 11:53, said:

Someone already posted it and the reviewer is a moron. Of course you'll stomp as top tier. Lets see it against a Jpz E100 when it blows your doors off with 420 pen dead center in your upper plate. 

 

It will bounce........its well over 300 effective and even more effective if you hit its sloped armor with heat.

 

Also Dont you think its a bit fked up that you have to load TIER 10 TD GOLD AMMO to pen a TEIR 8 TANK??!!!



_Bagheera_ #22 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 19:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 40135 battles
  • 5,814
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 12:04, said:

 

ok..anyone who needs to swear and conduct themselves like a [edited]on youtube is a moron. Even Claus is getting on my nerves for that crap. Sometimes quickybaby is a welcome change from all of these wanna-be youtube stars. I don't care how good a player he is. If I can't stand how he speaks, then its done for me. 

 

He plays and streams with quickybaby and jingles.....he's good. and he hit the nail on the head.

mattwong #23 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 19:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,331
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 13:22, said:

I'm referring to Mr Potty Mouth reviewer and the trend that every youtuber thinks every other word they speak has to be vulgar. 

 

Oh look, it's Ned Flanders, here to save us all from the terrible threat of potty-words.



21Blackjack #24 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 19:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 22160 battles
  • 2,856
  • Member since:
    02-03-2012

May this means there will be a British Conquerer Mk 1 Premium at Tier 8  with 400 hull armor right?

 

LOL no



Deathstar_Commander #25 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 56420 battles
  • 2,562
  • [YODA] YODA
  • Member since:
    05-16-2011

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 18:53, said:

Someone already posted it and the reviewer is a moron. Of course you'll stomp as top tier. Lets see it against a Jpz E100 when it blows your doors off with 420 pen dead center in your upper plate. 

 

Ya cuz if a tank can be penned by the highest penetration round in the game it must be balanced right?

FullMetalP0tat0 #26 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:14

    Private

  • Players
  • 26687 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    11-26-2013

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 18:22, said:

 

I'm referring to Mr Potty Mouth reviewer and the trend that every youtuber thinks every other word they speak has to be vulgar. 

 

Also the fact that the review is junk because he is only showing the tank top tier. 

 

Thanks for a laughs, always good to hear from a clueless muppet commenting on a very good player. As has been mentioned, you could learn a lot and he does swear a lot but he makes good points.
Don't even need to see your stats to see you're a bad player, could give you a bomb proof tank and you'd still fail to hit anywhere near Foch's gameplay levels in terms of damage or winrate.
In essence, you good sir, are an idiot.
 


Edited by FullMetalP0tat0, Feb 20 2017 - 20:14.


General_Lee_Miserable #27 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 12764 battles
  • 2,390
  • Member since:
    07-27-2013

View PostFullMetalP0tat0, on Feb 20 2017 - 20:14, said:

 

Thanks for a laughs, always good to hear from a clueless muppet commenting on a very good player. As has been mentioned, you could learn a lot and he does swear a lot but he makes good points.
Don't even need to see your stats to see you're a bad player, could give you a bomb proof tank and you'd still fail to hit anywhere near Foch's gameplay levels in terms of damage or winrate.
In essence, you good sir, are an idiot.
 

 

eh? I won at real life. I'll let you guys win at the game. Fair? 



FullMetalP0tat0 #28 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:19

    Private

  • Players
  • 26687 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    11-26-2013

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 19:16, said:

 

eh? I won at real life. I'll let you guys win at the game. Fair? 

 

Considering the level of some of your comments I very much doubt you 'won at life' but you keep repeating it and maybe it will come true for you flower.

An_Innocent_Bystander #29 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 12379 battles
  • 3,734
  • [HBC] HBC
  • Member since:
    05-09-2015

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 20:16, said:

 

eh? I won at real life. I'll let you guys win at the game. Fair? 

But this a forum about WoT. 

*Insert "You have no power here" meme*



hbgaming #30 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:22

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15367 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014

View PostFullMetalP0tat0, on Feb 20 2017 - 19:19, said:

 

Considering the level of some of your comments I very much doubt you 'won at life' but you keep repeating it and maybe it will come true for you flower.

 

That's how I measure my success in life as well, my posts on some stupid forum somewhere on the internet.  If you really believe this, I fear for society.

Rin_ #31 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 17710 battles
  • 3,100
  • [GSKYO] GSKYO
  • Member since:
    11-11-2015

View Posthbgaming, on Feb 20 2017 - 20:22, said:

 

That's how I measure my success in life as well, my posts on some stupid forum somewhere on the internet.  If you really believe this, I fear for society.

 

You logged into the wrong account.

General_Lee_Miserable #32 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 12764 battles
  • 2,390
  • Member since:
    07-27-2013

View PostFullMetalP0tat0, on Feb 20 2017 - 20:19, said:

 

Considering the level of some of your comments I very much doubt you 'won at life' but you keep repeating it and maybe it will come true for you flower.

 

The guys that poke at stats are those who only have that to fall back on. I would never poke at someones stats because I understand how ridiculous it is to do so. When you log out of the game, your stats aren't going to mean squat beyond your computer desk. So, who cares who is better at the game? I don't. I like to do as well as I can. However, I'm quite comfortable at my 49.5% WR because I have a blast playing the game. Stat shaming on a game forum is for people who have massive insecurities about their own existence. It's not even debatable. Want to ridicule my calling the review a moron? Fine. I can take it. But doing so using my stats means you have a problem, not me. 



SMBakerESQ #33 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 2,014
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 13:17, said:

 

lol.. right. Who cares about stats? This is a game lol. I care more about real life. If you even need to point someones stats out to them, then you need to re-prioritize yourself. 

 

​And that's the excuse the lazy and /or stupid use for not being better

hbgaming #34 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:33

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15367 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014

View PostRin_, on Feb 20 2017 - 19:25, said:

 

You logged into the wrong account.

 

I did?  What other account should I be logging into?

SMBakerESQ #35 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 2,014
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostDrewthesteelman, on Feb 20 2017 - 14:27, said:

 

The guys that poke at stats are those who only have that to fall back on. I would never poke at someones stats because I understand how ridiculous it is to do so. When you log out of the game, your stats aren't going to mean squat beyond your computer desk. So, who cares who is better at the game? I don't. I like to do as well as I can. However, I'm quite comfortable at my 49.5% WR because I have a blast playing the game. Stat shaming on a game forum is for people who have massive insecurities about their own existence. It's not even debatable. Want to ridicule my calling the review a moron? Fine. I can take it. But doing so using my stats means you have a problem, not me. 

 

​But with your stats your opinion can only be correct by random chance.  Since the reviewer is a far better player than you his opinion is based on skill, your is based on jealousy

 



An_Innocent_Bystander #36 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 12379 battles
  • 3,734
  • [HBC] HBC
  • Member since:
    05-09-2015

View PostSMBakerESQ, on Feb 20 2017 - 20:32, said:

 

​And that's the excuse the lazy and /or stupid use for not being better

 



hbgaming #37 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:38

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15367 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014

View PostSMBakerESQ, on Feb 20 2017 - 19:34, said:

 

​But with your stats your opinion can only be correct by random chance.  Since the reviewer is a far better player than you his opinion is based on skill, your is based on jealousy

 

 

I'm pretty sure he's calling him a moron based on his choice of words, not on how he reviewed the tank.  In that instance it has nothing to do with stats, the tank, or WOT.  It's his opinion based on how he sees him as a human being.  People who swear a lot usually do so because they can't formulate an articulate way of getting their point across.  

SMBakerESQ #38 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 2,014
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostDeathstar_Commander, on Feb 20 2017 - 14:06, said:

 

Ya cuz if a tank can be penned by the highest penetration round in the game it must be balanced right?

 

​From a tank 2 tiers higher too.  With his logic all tier 8 premiums are terrible because they don't hold up to E5 or E100.

SMBakerESQ #39 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 2,014
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View Posthbgaming, on Feb 20 2017 - 14:38, said:

 

I'm pretty sure he's calling him a moron based on his choice of words, not on how he reviewed the tank.  In that instance it has nothing to do with stats, the tank, or WOT.  It's his opinion based on how he sees him as a human being.  People who swear a lot usually do so because they can't formulate an articulate way of getting their point across.  

 

 

He did that in addition to, not only.  In addition its FOCH, who is famous for sarcasm and irony, which has slipped past most of the player base.


Edited by SMBakerESQ, Feb 20 2017 - 20:43.


Radonis #40 Posted Feb 20 2017 - 20:50

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 12932 battles
  • 984
  • Member since:
    02-12-2015
Oh this noob of a player call SirFoch a Moron is hilarious yea he is only what 44th ranked EU player in WN8 I believe if you want to go by such things. Also he is a straight pull no punches type of streamer and you tuber and no way near a snowflake. The op is the one i would call a snowflake cause his ears cant handle cussing a bit. Also at 3k games you the Op knows hardly anything about the the game. If you like QB stick with him but he hardly gives a bad review to WG unless its blatantly obvious and people would call him out on it. Op learn the game then come back and post a good thread.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users