Jump to content


Should the T67 get the Hellcat treatment?


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

Poll: T67 (127 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 100 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should it get Hellcat nerfs?

  1. Yes (51 votes [40.16%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 40.16%

  2. No (57 votes [44.88%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 44.88%

  3. I'm only here for the flamewar! (19 votes [14.96%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.96%

Vote Hide poll

omgtankswtfbbq #41 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 14:26

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 8994 battles
  • 45
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    08-30-2015
It's fine. Stop being such a crybaby. Adapt and overcome. It's not like the leaderboards are nothing but T67's every time you play them in a pub match.

Patonb #42 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 14:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 26178 battles
  • 4,473
  • Member since:
    06-05-2012
The only real issue with it is the view range. It's gg if you're on an open map and the t67 the only guy left.

Hurk #43 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 17:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 42324 battles
  • 12,412
  • [KGR] KGR
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

View Postspud_tuber, on Mar 21 2017 - 06:02, said:

I've said before in these types of threads that that first step should be nerfing the gun to the stats of the M1A1 on the wolverine has.
http://tanks.gg/comp...1311e~wolverine
The wolverine should get something over the T67 than just .03 accuracy, with worse gun handling, for having the M1A2.

the issue is that wolverine is balanced, while the 67 is not... which is why the 67 needs to be nerfed, and not the wolverine buffed.



Nubslayer #44 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 18:25

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20436 battles
  • 148
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011

give it a 90mm gun.

 

that will increase the weight and nerf its mobility.

 

it will also decrease its rate of fire.

 

problem solved!



spud_tuber #45 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 20:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 36127 battles
  • 2,751
  • Member since:
    08-26-2013

View PostHurk, on Mar 21 2017 - 10:46, said:

the issue is that wolverine is balanced, while the 67 is not... which is why the 67 needs to be nerfed, and not the wolverine buffed.

That was my point.  Nerf the gun on the T67, so that post nerf the wolverine has a gun advantage relative to the T67, which it currently doesn't have other than 0.03 accuracy.



Dave_181 #46 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 21:07

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 12950 battles
  • 278
  • Member since:
    01-28-2016

1.  Eliminate T67 from game.

2.  Move Hellcat to tier 5 where it belongs.

Now we have solved two problems at once. Hellcat would be competitive at tier 5 but it's not mobile enough for drive by shooting like the T67 currently is.



leeuniverse #47 Posted Mar 21 2017 - 21:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 26142 battles
  • 6,214
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

View PostDuqe, on Mar 21 2017 - 01:28, said:

I mean, uh. Mate. Did you even play the game, like, ever?

 

Have you?

It was like the first "good" tank of the game to get the MASSIVE NERF treatment, something like 3 years ago.

It used to play wonderfully, was a joy tank to play, then they nerfed it similar to how the Hellcat nerfing occurred much later.

Slower in all movements, speed, traverse, reverse, turret, aim-time/bloom, etc. all just like the Hellcat later received.

They didn't really or at all touch the DPM, just like they didn't really touch the Hellcats DPM.

 

They did the same to other tanks.... KV-1S, nerfed to [edited], but kept the big gun (now the KV-85).

FV304, nerfed to [edited], but basically kept it's DPM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users