Markd73, on Apr 20 2017 - 16:58, said:
Don't let your ego and emotions get in the way. You were mistaken and got called out on it. Admit you are wrong (at least to yourself) and move on.
Going full Ad Hominem on someone who points out your error is a waste of time.
All the OP did was just tell the super rude guy that his answer was not correct either, so he shouldn't be a [edited]...
CanOfTomatoes, on Apr 21 2017 - 01:58, said:
Listen you total DUMB [edited]read the crap you screenshot...HEAVY'S AND MEDIUMS STILL REMAIN RANDOM...STILL REMAIN RANDOM...STILL REMAIN RANDOM..WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT MEAN DIPSHICK...STILL REMAIN RANDOM>>RANDOM LOOK IT UP..AND GENIUS IT SAID THAT TDS LTS AND SPGS were taken in consideration
See the part Random..random..random..heavys and medium...RANDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He is still being a [edited], reported.
A few posts ago you said:
CanOfTomatoes, on Apr 20 2017 - 06:48, said:
You are one of the people which didnt bother to actually read the change and understand it. Nor did you bother to get involved in testing it..let other do that and then complain about it. No where did they even hint that the new MM was going to balance tank types. They did balance tank tiers as stated. MM is the foundation of the game and changing it without extended real game test time is absolutely foolish. They also clearly stated this was step one...step two will come after they make sure there is NO extended down time with the program that you have to wait 2 minutes for a match.
So which is it? The incorrect snap call you made? Or the one you are trying to pass off now as your own idea?
Inmate060714, on Apr 21 2017 - 02:04, said:
This guy gets my vote for topic A-HOLE!
CanOfTomatoes, on Apr 21 2017 - 02:17, said:
Good thanks for the up vote for being 100% correct the post the OP made is wrong...WG made it clear as hopefully you can read that heavys and mediums will remain random...so what he is [edited]about was explained by WG clearly...snowflake...he stupidly highlighted and quoted it as me being incorrect..which is not a good idea to screenshot and post something that proves the post you are trying to disprove is right...but thanks for picking me as the [edited]it really doesn't bother me..thanks again.
The OP's title is wrong. There is no heavy balancing.
You, however, were more wrong by saying NO TANK TYPES WERE BALANCED.
He did highlight and quote you as incorrect, BECAUSE YOU WERE INCORRECT.