Jump to content


Season 5 lengthened, yet again

CW Clan Wars season rule change WG players poll fair legality

  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

Poll: What do you think of WG changing the "rules" yet again? (73 members have cast votes)

Should changes to seasons/campaigns be allowed after they are started?

  1. Never. Once a rule is in place, WG should honor it. (43 votes [58.90%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 58.90%

  2. Occasionally. Some rules may need to be changed under certain circumstances, but should at least be announced. (26 votes [35.62%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 35.62%

  3. Always. WG is a business, and they have the right to change whatever they want, unannounced. (4 votes [5.48%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.48%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

MuzzleLoad #1 Posted Apr 20 2017 - 17:53

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 47047 battles
  • 243
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
I know our clan isn't the only clan upset with yet another season extension. It was long enough, without a 20 day, and now another, 27 day extension. That is 47 days ADDED to an already gruelingly long season. This poll is to give some constructive feedback to WG, and hopefully get maybe at least one answer out of them as to the reason behind this. I will tell you WG, what the players have to say about this, and what we think your reasons are. The main school of thought among players for these extensions is that you are not ready to release your next campaign, so you keep extending the season to coincide with that release, therefore minimizing any "downtime" which results in no time for anyone to grind any credits or tanks, resulting in a better profit margin for you since we have to continually buy gold to even have enough credits to play CW not to mention the converting of free XP if we dare dream of getting any new tanks. Now, normally, anyone with any business savvy would spin this take and say, "we dont want our players to become bored" , but we think we know what the bottom line is. So please WG, prove us wrong with a nice clear concise reply of why you think these changes are fair to your players, your CUSTOMERS.

madxbrad13 #2 Posted Apr 20 2017 - 18:26

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20435 battles
  • 119
  • [LOAD] LOAD
  • Member since:
    02-25-2011

If they do have to extend seasons for whatever reason they should say why and make a post on the forum about it 

 


Edited by madxbrad13, Apr 20 2017 - 18:27.


Hoefish #3 Posted Apr 20 2017 - 19:08

    Private

  • Players
  • 30940 battles
  • 2
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-02-2011
Never. Its like if week 15 in the NFL they added 4 more weeks. Everyone is about ready for it to be over and it appears like the teams you wanted to be at the end are not. Appearance is everything.

Ace_Ion #4 Posted Apr 20 2017 - 19:12

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17155 battles
  • 51
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
I voted for never. But where is the WG doesn't give a damn what u think selection?

Arclight58 #5 Posted Apr 20 2017 - 23:23

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 39960 battles
  • 739
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
It should have never been changed the first time, you know what to expect when it started then when the end is near the rules change so you keep clunking along then when that time is up here comes another change.

Devildog8 #6 Posted Apr 20 2017 - 23:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 9203 battles
  • 3,200
  • [XILES] XILES
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011
they wont listen, so it doesnt really matter what the poll reflects

MuzzleLoad #7 Posted Apr 21 2017 - 00:43

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 47047 battles
  • 243
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

View PostDevildog8, on Apr 20 2017 - 22:55, said:

they wont listen, so it doesnt really matter what the poll reflects

 

You never know, at least I'm voicing my concerns.

Devildog8 #8 Posted Apr 21 2017 - 01:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 9203 battles
  • 3,200
  • [XILES] XILES
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

View PostMuzzleLoad, on Apr 20 2017 - 17:43, said:

 

You never know, at least I'm voicing my concerns.

 

absolutely 

Trapster99 #9 Posted Apr 21 2017 - 02:41

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 36949 battles
  • 122
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

Meanwhile, back at Wargaming headquarters, regarding this thread and the extension of the Clan Wars Season extension:

 

https://wearechange....r_0-400x224.jpg


Edited by Trapster99, Apr 21 2017 - 02:49.


Yankee #10 Posted Apr 21 2017 - 09:54

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 33410 battles
  • 9,777
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010

If they want to keep seasons going, they should pay the rewards, and start another season. 

 

It's that simple.



Arclight58 #11 Posted Apr 21 2017 - 12:45

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 39960 battles
  • 739
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostYankee, on Apr 21 2017 - 03:54, said:

If they want to keep seasons going, they should pay the rewards, and start another season. 

 

It's that simple.

 

^ This exactly.

BigDollarBillz #12 Posted Apr 21 2017 - 22:28

    Captain

  • Players
  • 33899 battles
  • 1,758
  • [SBW] SBW
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
Yeah it sucks big time. Once it is set in stone before the season starts, that should be the end date. I know SBW is no where near a top clan, but even for us the season has already been to long.

MF_Kool_Aid135 #13 Posted Apr 23 2017 - 17:31

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 22799 battles
  • 39
  • [TOGWR] TOGWR
  • Member since:
    05-08-2012

after all the extensions... at least like divide the season in two.... phase 1 (x weeks) (dead period like 2 weeks?) and then phase 2, or just make 2 seasons out of it.

 

there doesn't always have to be a campaign at the end of a season....

 


Edited by MF_Kool_Aid135, Apr 23 2017 - 17:34.


WhoDat65 #14 Posted Apr 26 2017 - 18:39

    Captain

  • Players
  • 35578 battles
  • 1,192
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
Wow!  Now I have to tell the wife and kids I won't be able to see them for awhile longer.  Sorry honey.

Swamplander #15 Posted May 02 2017 - 16:36

    Private

  • Players
  • 11738 battles
  • 5
  • [XILES] XILES
  • Member since:
    11-24-2011
If WG is going to extend this grueling season 5, not once but twice, they need to up the rewards for this. Just say'n. :)

raymee101 #16 Posted May 03 2017 - 21:16

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 52659 battles
  • 135
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    09-06-2012
maybe if they could switch up maps each week or bring tank locking back in it would make things more interesting for such a long season.  Seeing the same maps and same tanks every single battle is way too boring for such a long season, at least tank locking means you will start to face all kinds of interesting compositions instead of just defenders and vk100s on 90% of the maps at tier 8 anyways.  

mutantmatt #17 Posted May 16 2017 - 02:34

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29287 battles
  • 40
  • [DBLTG] DBLTG
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

They'll keep extending it until the teams they want near the top get there.

 



mojave #18 Posted May 16 2017 - 18:34

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22275 battles
  • 198
  • [RELIC] RELIC
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

View Postmutantmatt, on May 16 2017 - 01:34, said:

They'll keep extending it until the teams they want near the top get there.

 

Implying Wargaming cares about any clans.



memegene #19 Posted May 17 2017 - 15:26

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27415 battles
  • 1,228
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    02-21-2013
What do you want to bet that WG starts a 10th stage? 

mojave #20 Posted May 17 2017 - 18:35

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22275 battles
  • 198
  • [RELIC] RELIC
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
A shiny nickel that rivals the polish on Loz's forehead




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users