Jump to content


WoT 9.19 Common Test: Ranked Battle Feedback Thread


  • Please log in to reply
93 replies to this topic

geek070 #81 Posted Jun 08 2017 - 19:10

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 27134 battles
  • 32
  • [-U-M-] -U-M-
  • Member since:
    05-22-2016

View PostMountainGoatNoName, on May 08 2017 - 14:58, said:

 

It's unfair for sure. But it doesn't really matter in low tier random battles.

1. Improved equipment is too rare to equip on low tier tanks.

2. Platoon is the most unfair mechanic in random battles.

 

If I'll get equipment I'll put it on tank I play most - T8 prem to grind credits

HellsBells_ #82 Posted Jun 08 2017 - 19:31

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 27761 battles
  • 661
  • [HLBL] HLBL
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011
this may have been mentioned already, but losing ranks takes the fun out of it, once you achieve a rank it should be locked for you, losing chevrons i agree with but not ranks.

geek070 #83 Posted Jun 09 2017 - 14:52

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 27134 battles
  • 32
  • [-U-M-] -U-M-
  • Member since:
    05-22-2016

View PostMountainGoatNoName, on May 09 2017 - 06:05, said:

 

This is the most accessible competitive mode.  It's best way for new player to get into the competitive scene. No need to join a clan with a list of requirements. No need to follow others' call. Just a tierX tank. 

 

This is the most balanced game mode. No platoon. No different tiers. Skill based matchmaking.

 

+1. but why only T10? Same mode on T6 and T8 would be nice. 

geek070 #84 Posted Jun 09 2017 - 14:58

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 27134 battles
  • 32
  • [-U-M-] -U-M-
  • Member since:
    05-22-2016

View PostI_DIE_ALOT_2, on May 14 2017 - 06:01, said:

As i read it if you only won 33% you would loose more chevrons than you gain so would never get past rank 1 but i think it should get progressively harder to rank up like top 12 get a chevron from rank 1 to 2 then only top 10 from rank 2 to 3 then only the top 8 from rank 3 to 4 ect.. 

read little more and think -  it will get progressively harder for 2 reasons - #1 better players on higher ranks, #2 more chevrons to reach next rank



R_E_D_BUCCANEER #85 Posted Jun 12 2017 - 15:04

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 15733 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016
 At first I thought this is going to be a great thing. Play against other players of the same skill level as you. Totally incorrect  I was checking players stats from the first battle to the last.  I'm definitely disappointed and will not continue to play right battles. Just the best players getting better .

_EY_ #86 Posted Jun 14 2017 - 04:54

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 39760 battles
  • 106
  • Member since:
    03-29-2011
I was just in a light tank capped 100% me, only did 638 damage. Still not in the top 12, so if winning the game doesn't give you points anymore just take it out. Should be more xp for this.

LordTutor #87 Posted Jun 14 2017 - 19:47

    Private

  • Players
  • 30307 battles
  • 9
  • [REBCO] REBCO
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
So, we had a draw and since both teams are considered to be losers, only top three on both teams got chevrons. I feel this is wrong, normally thirteen chevrons are rewarded and only six were awarded this battle. I think 12 chevrons should be given out in a draw, one less then normal, but being an even number, they could be split evenly between the two teams with the top six of both teams receiving chevrons. of course I was top five and received nothing and I think I lost a chevron although I had a pretty good battle.

LpBronco #88 Posted Jun 14 2017 - 21:21

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 36201 battles
  • 1,948
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    11-19-2010
Really would like to see numbers on how many went from 1st stage to 2nd stage as getting to rank 2 and keeping it has been impossible so far as we keep knocking each other back down. Given the expense of playing, I'll finish the first season but the payout and rewards are not making this mode a winner in my book as at this rate I may have a total of 1200 bonds at the end of the season which won't pay for a single piece of equipment. Another Rampage impossible task that just isn't worth the effort.

Elbroth #89 Posted Jun 15 2017 - 02:12

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29861 battles
  • 526
  • [TOGWR] TOGWR
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

Yeah This is a FAIL..

 

Play for the top 3 is on your team that's the only way to advance. Whats the rewards again? Oh spent silver Buy prem rounds.. THATS Right.



Baal_Zann #90 Posted Jun 15 2017 - 05:41

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 34185 battles
  • 28
  • [HIWAY] HIWAY
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011
Loving ranked battles, but it seems like bots are fully able to reach the top there, and when I lose my ranks because everyone wants to kemp bush and chai snipe, it makes me very salty, and considering how its been done it should be impossible for bots to reach that point

so I'll ask bluntly, does wargaming add bots to artificially create challenge or to push someone towards spending their money, because thats the only explanation I can see for this

Edited by Baal_Zann, Jun 15 2017 - 05:43.


DMWelter #91 Posted Jun 15 2017 - 20:20

    Private

  • Players
  • 33979 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011

Sorry, I don't know how to erase this post, I had misunderstood the new ranked battle times but now I got it.

If someone can please delete this post, thanks :D


Edited by paulaofaive, Jun 15 2017 - 20:33.


aws7381lr #92 Posted Jun 19 2017 - 06:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 50596 battles
  • 11
  • [FADES] FADES
  • Member since:
    05-22-2013
Just played 2 hours and ended up right where I started.  This is a pathetic game mode.  WG still DOES NOT UNDERSTAND how to put teams together that are close to equal.  This is not a ranked battle system.  This is just another luck based game mode where winning is more a function of the quality of players on your team rather than your indivdual skill level.  Way too many 15-3 battles to be a ranked battle system.  WG-fix this crap or get rid of it.  And don't have special equipment that is only able to be purchased by the few top players who play this mode.   The reasons for that are obvious and have been voiced by many on this forum and elsewhere.  Pay attention to them.  What WG is doing here will rank up there with some of the dumbest stuff they have done to this game. 

xXTommyCookerXx #93 Posted Jun 27 2017 - 02:35

    Private

  • Players
  • 15203 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011

Played this mode quite a bit now and my observations are:

1. There is no point trying to play the game properly, like covering a flanking position or spotting as you will never get a chevron

2. This game mode is just an all in brawl in the middle

3. You have heavies hiding up the back waiting for what is left of the enemy team so that they get in top three on the losing side (and guaranteeing the lose by not helping the team)

4. The amount of abuse is unbelievable, so much so that I turned off chat (again this doesn't help the game strategically)

5. Sometimes an entire team will not move from their base and if you get spotted you die instantly

 

This mode has potential but not in its current format



Keller13 #94 Posted Jun 29 2017 - 02:26

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28425 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    07-31-2013
My honest feedback wargaming.  Your new mode sucks!  Every game three arties!  Every game!  Most games my crew is only not stunned for a minute or so.  If not for the improved equipment I would not play this mode even for gold.  Seriously, just one game mode without artillery ruining it for everyone.  Let alone the mm meaning whoever has the most super heavies wins.  Have only made it to rank four because playing this mode makes me want to uninstall.  Seriously hating the game with this mode.  You can look at how long each game is.  It's a campfest.  What a boring frustrating concept.  Whoever came up with this idea needs to lay of the sauce.

Edited by Keller13, Jul 02 2017 - 03:58.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users