Jump to content


That's It, i'm selling all my British Tanks


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

Rin_ #21 Posted May 16 2017 - 02:31

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 16104 battles
  • 2,732
  • [YOUJO] YOUJO
  • Member since:
    11-11-2015

View Postmob12345678, on May 16 2017 - 01:53, said:

 

oh u think i didn't do that...Been using such crappy fps since i started WOT with no knowledge how to play...thats a bit of how i ended u having low win rate

 

Should I report the guy on my friends list who gets super unicum with 14 FPS and started from nothing?

doogie9982 #22 Posted May 16 2017 - 02:36

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17907 battles
  • 150
  • Member since:
    12-06-2012
Only Brit tanks that I found are worth a sh!t are the Crommie and the Charioteer.  Comet might be ok now with the new MM, maybe I'll buy it back.

Slatherer #23 Posted May 16 2017 - 02:40

    Major

  • Players
  • 25424 battles
  • 2,051
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014
Fps is huge.  It adds consistency and predicability of any movement.  Im running and i7 with 16 gig ram and an SSD, WITHOUT a gpu.  I see 20 to 45 fps, depending if there are any plants/trees in view.  

I KNOW I will do better with a gpu, which im saving for.

All I can say is you have no right to blame the Brit line, or the game for your horrible framerate.  Get a better computer or repair it if your os is corrupted.  You cant blame the game, at all.

Jeez dude.  20fps and you blame the game?!?

Fr33kzilla #24 Posted May 16 2017 - 02:48

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14412 battles
  • 117
  • Member since:
    02-05-2015

View Postzarg12, on May 16 2017 - 01:52, said:


There are many performance increasing mods out there, try them. 

 

 

Performance enhancing mods are illegal dude. You should get banned for life just for suggesting he uses them. Those things RUIN games. Shame on you. If you HAVE to use them, then YOU are a scrub.

nickalaso123 #25 Posted May 16 2017 - 02:57

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14144 battles
  • 111
  • [9ATD] 9ATD
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
I'm currently at the conqueror and british tanks especially the heavies are not for newbies and they certainly require a certain level of skill to play effectively.

spinax22 #26 Posted May 16 2017 - 03:13

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17942 battles
  • 67
  • [27PZR] 27PZR
  • Member since:
    10-08-2011
As a former deep red tomato, with less than 45% wins, i love the Black Prince. and the Caernarvon. and even the Churchill 1, in all it's badness. if you can't do well, just remember that you're a heavy tank with a medium tank gun. and if you think British tanks in THIS game are bad... 

Southern_Comfort #27 Posted May 16 2017 - 03:56

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 32668 battles
  • 709
  • Member since:
    07-14-2013

View PostEvoNeiko, on May 15 2017 - 16:53, said:

lol i'm just starting to love my Brit tanks!   Church is a bored at T6 but still fun.    AT7 has to be so far one of the most fun tanks i've been playing.    i sold my US TD's.. i just can't play them well. i did all i can and i stink in them...  Germ TD and Brit TD i love..   i can't wait to try the AT-15 or the T9   yea they don't hit for a lot. but they make up for it in Reload.  at less i enjoy it :P

 

Expect to lose credits with the AT15 even on a win, someone told me the Tortoise makes credits though, AT7 and AT2 are keepers though...

Southern_Comfort #28 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:00

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 32668 battles
  • 709
  • Member since:
    07-14-2013

View Postzarg12, on May 15 2017 - 16:52, said:


There are many performance increasing mods out there, try them. 

 

 

Wow, wannabees need banned cheats!

wolfwhite2 #29 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:03

    Private

  • Beta Testers
  • 36387 battles
  • 2
  • [DIXIE] DIXIE
  • Member since:
    12-14-2010
Each tank tree has its own pros and cons.  Depending on what tech line you are using exploit the strengths. 

RC_1140 #30 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:12

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 49443 battles
  • 973
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

First facepalm to the people replying to "performance enhancing mods" I do believe he meant performance as in fps and such, stuff lousy computers deal with. 

 

Also until a few months ago I had 10-20 fps. And I love my comet, charioteer, and centurion. So I'm not sure how one persons low fps makes an entire country of tanks bad for everyone.



_Gungrave_ #31 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 32906 battles
  • 7,479
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postmob12345678, on May 16 2017 - 01:51, said:

 

Hm...you think this game is about skill only?? I have less than 20 FPS and know that i can't miss shots i took at point blank...but guess what My shot headed right for the ground

 

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you're playing on a laptop...thats a really bad idea for gaming.

 

Laptops are like the console version of a PC, limited capacity and piss poor heat management.


Edited by _Gungrave_, May 16 2017 - 04:27.


SacherMasoc #32 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:30

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4315 battles
  • 380
  • Member since:
    01-07-2016

Centurion AX and Conqueror are worth grinding through the turkeys in their respective lines. Heavy line is the worst especially since the medium line got some buffs. I doubt if you'll enjoy Japanese tanks any more than Brits, as the guns are more potato.

I've played about 15-20k battles with 20 fps and 200 ping so I feel your pain. Upgrading this week, FeelsGoodMan. Have you tried using WoT Tweaker?



_Gungrave_ #33 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:37

    Major

  • Players
  • 32906 battles
  • 7,479
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostSacherMasoc, on May 16 2017 - 04:30, said:

Centurion AX and Conqueror are worth grinding through the turkeys in their respective lines. Heavy line is the worst especially since the medium line got some buffs. I doubt if you'll enjoy Japanese tanks any more than Brits, as the guns are more potato.

I've played about 15-20k battles with 20 fps and 200 ping so I feel your pain. Upgrading this week, FeelsGoodMan. Have you tried using WoT Tweaker?

 

Japanese heavies can be fun so long as you learn their meta but on some maps with arty around they're almost unplayable.

schwert_2015 #34 Posted May 16 2017 - 04:38

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 25424 battles
  • 1,503
  • Member since:
    01-21-2015
Well, if the old Avalon Hill games like ASL, Tobruk, and Panzer Leader were accurate at all, the British tanks were pretty crap, except for the Matilda.

Jarms48 #35 Posted May 16 2017 - 07:03

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 107 battles
  • 946
  • Member since:
    06-21-2015
The Churchill VII, Churchill Black Prince, and the Caernarvon are all rather meh. But the Matilda, Churchill I, and Conqueror are all highlights of the heavy line. I haven't played the AT series of vehicles yet, but from what I'm hearing the AT2, AT7 and the FV215b are fun. I'm only up to the Centurion I on the medium line but I've enjoyed every machine along the way. 

sneakytails #36 Posted May 16 2017 - 20:27

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5946 battles
  • 123
  • Member since:
    06-01-2014

The Tier 5 Matilda Black Prince has higher DPM than the tier 8 FV4202........

 

 



Poitou_Donkey #37 Posted May 16 2017 - 21:47

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 18198 battles
  • 82
  • [PGHS] PGHS
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015

View Postmob12345678, on May 16 2017 - 01:45, said:

So sick and Fed up of the horrible stats they are giving specific british tanks. So far a lot of person's Good part of the Brits is that they are "Fun" So while every nation has overdose of stats british gets "Fun" Is fun all they want people to be making the brits looks like they never took war seriously. So making all those Paper is just showing how Bias and shows your Hatred For the brits 

 

 

WELL I'M GOING TO SELL NOW...JAP HERE I COME >.>

 

You will come to know the pain of 32% WR of the O-Ho. It's pathetic 215 pen 100mm gun trying to dent a Maus, really, those are tears of laughter. Or, you'll stick with the stupid slow derp gun and cry about how the nerfed the heck out of HE when you hit the Tortoise and do zero damage. Trust me, I know your pain with the Brits, it's why I only have a Matilda and Crusader SP active right now ;)

DVK9 #38 Posted May 17 2017 - 01:26

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 21884 battles
  • 343
  • [-TX-] -TX-
  • Member since:
    05-15-2013

View PostSouthern_Comfort, on May 15 2017 - 20:56, said:

 

Expect to lose credits with the AT15 even on a win, someone told me the Tortoise makes credits though, AT7 and AT2 are keepers though...

 

I love my angry turtle. Make credits on most battles.

 



_Gungrave_ #39 Posted May 17 2017 - 18:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 32906 battles
  • 7,479
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostPoitou_Donkey, on May 16 2017 - 21:47, said:

 

You will come to know the pain of 32% WR of the O-Ho. It's pathetic 215 pen 100mm gun trying to dent a Maus, really, those are tears of laughter. Or, you'll stick with the stupid slow derp gun and cry about how the nerfed the heck out of HE when you hit the Tortoise and do zero damage. Trust me, I know your pain with the Brits, it's why I only have a Matilda and Crusader SP active right now ;)

 

The ONLY way you do crap damage to a tank is if it has a spall liner, I did exceptionally well in the Oho because that tank requires you to play it like a chess player thinking 3 moves ahead.

 

 

Tank Name Country Type Tier Battles Win Rate DPG Avg. Dmg. Blocked Avg. Spots KPG Hit Ratio Avg. Exp Total Exp Mastery WN8
O-Ho Japan HT 8 264 54.55% 1617 1287.73 0.69 1.04 66% 654 172530 Ace Tanker 1733


the_Deadly_Bulb #40 Posted May 17 2017 - 20:43

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16289 battles
  • 599
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

View PostFr33kzilla, on May 15 2017 - 17:48, said:

 

Performance enhancing mods are illegal dude. You should get banned for life just for suggesting he uses them. Those things RUIN games. Shame on you. If you HAVE to use them, then YOU are a scrub.

 

 I believe they're suggesting mods to increase your frame rate, which are actually recommended by WG, espescially for players with PC that use integrated or 'on board' graphics solutions rather than a proper 3D accelerator and GPU. These have absolutely no advantage to the player in game. They only provide a potential gain for your hardware issues. I say potential because my belief is that there are no effective software boosts for hardware issues. They're best remedied with a credit card.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users