Jump to content


Wait wait wait...


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

_Bagheera_ #1 Posted May 18 2017 - 16:35

    Major

  • Players
  • 36887 battles
  • 5,740
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011

On the new Chrysler K you buffed the APCR to 260mm but dont touch the ammo on the T32 and T29 at all???!!!

 

lmbo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=GO52kQ_WLVo



Belize_UBstudent #2 Posted May 18 2017 - 16:37

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24331 battles
  • 514
  • [Y0L0] Y0L0
  • Member since:
    03-11-2013
yes, Its perfect. obviously.! 

_Bagheera_ #3 Posted May 18 2017 - 16:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 36887 battles
  • 5,740
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
With probably the best gun soft stats on any american tank at tier 8 as well I might add......

Edited by _Bagheera_, May 18 2017 - 16:52.


CapPhrases #4 Posted May 18 2017 - 16:57

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 7280 battles
  • 3,529
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015
careful. saying negative things about it will have WG take you down like they did SirFoch today.

Kamahl1234 #5 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 18395 battles
  • 10,078
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

View PostCapPhrases, on May 18 2017 - 15:57, said:

careful. saying negative things about it will have WG take you down like they did SirFoch today.

 

That was cause he was being very negative of the company itself, even trobs called him out on that.

churchill50 #6 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:01

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 20577 battles
  • 2,143
  • [HIME] HIME
  • Member since:
    05-17-2014

View PostKamahl1234, on May 18 2017 - 09:00, said:

 

That was cause he was being very negative of the company itself, even trobs called him out on that.

 

To be honest though, they kind of deserve it for some of the recent "balance" decisions they've made.

FrozenKemp #7 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 52977 battles
  • 9,733
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011

260mm!?   Wow, what the hell. 



BigDollarBillz #8 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 38772 battles
  • 4,424
  • [SBW] SBW
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
They should really fix the damn friends list, instead of putting out another money grabber.

datalink7 #9 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:05

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 21416 battles
  • 64
  • [DYNO] DYNO
  • Member since:
    07-10-2013

View PostKamahl1234, on May 18 2017 - 16:00, said:

 

That was cause he was being very negative of the company itself, even trobs called him out on that.

 

 

Still BS that they threatened him because of a negative view of the company. Removing him as a Community Contributor makes sense (even Foch agreed with that), but the rest is BS. Who cares how critical he is of the company?



Scorpiany #10 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:05

    Major

  • Game Knowledge Expert
  • 36872 battles
  • 13,028
  • [N1NJA] N1NJA
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View PostCapPhrases, on May 18 2017 - 08:57, said:

careful. saying negative things about it will have WG take you down like they did SirFoch today.

 

View PostKamahl1234, on May 18 2017 - 09:00, said:

 

That was cause he was being very negative of the company itself, even trobs called him out on that.

 

Does anyone have an archive of his video? I missed the upload. D:

 

Edit: I found it. https://www.facebook.com/WorldofTanksPolskaFanPage/videos/1071566622943302/?hc_location=ufi

 

View Postdatalink7, on May 18 2017 - 09:05, said:

 

 

Still BS that they threatened him because of a negative view of the company. Removing him as a Community Contributor makes sense (even Foch agreed with that), but the rest is BS. Who cares how critical he is of the company?

 

Did he agree with that on live stream? Do you have a time stamp from his latest broadcast?

 

He most likely shouldnt have had the video taken down by WG either way though, but I want to see what was going on myself before I make any judgments in either direction.

 

Edit: The video wasn't even any different from his normal rants. I'm surprised they let him stay as a Community Contributor as long as they did if they don't like that kind of video.


Edited by Scorpiany, May 18 2017 - 17:32.


Kamahl1234 #11 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 18395 battles
  • 10,078
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

View Postchurchill50, on May 18 2017 - 16:01, said:

 

To be honest though, they kind of deserve it for some of the recent "balance" decisions they've made.

We deserve it. Remember the Krupp? That tank is a pretty well balanced tier 7 TD. Yet it was compared to only OP premiums at that tier and deemed "terrible don't buy" by most reviewers. Players want to play the best tanks. They sell well and we as a community are only further rewarding and incentivizing this.

View Postdatalink7, on May 18 2017 - 16:05, said:

 

 

Still BS that they threatened him because of a negative view of the company. Removing him as a Community Contributor makes sense (even Foch agreed with that), but the rest is BS. Who cares how critical he is of the company?

They threatened a copyright strike on a video of a game and content they own, which was produced and the cause of a Community Contributor losing their title. It shouldn't be surprising that any company will try to take down that video. He's an influencer for the community. It's not good to have someone rip into the company like this, especially solely placing the blame on one aspect, rather than the cause and effect that is what is behind pretty much every game seeing powercreep like this. 



TeaTimeWithKongou #12 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:15

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 8476 battles
  • 794
  • [K0HAI] K0HAI
  • Member since:
    04-06-2016
Yeah that's [edited]give my t32 and m6a2e1 260 Apr pen...

Edited by Classics4lyfe, May 18 2017 - 17:16.


datalink7 #13 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:16

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 21416 battles
  • 64
  • [DYNO] DYNO
  • Member since:
    07-10-2013

View PostScorpiany, on May 18 2017 - 16:05, said:

 

 

Does anyone have an archive of his video? I missed the upload. D:

 

 

Did he agree with that on live stream? Do you have a time stamp from his latest broadcast?

 

He most likely shouldnt have had the video taken down by WG either way though, but I want to see what was going on myself before I make any judgments in either direction.

 

 



Scorpiany #14 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:19

    Major

  • Game Knowledge Expert
  • 36872 battles
  • 13,028
  • [N1NJA] N1NJA
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View Postdatalink7, on May 18 2017 - 09:16, said:

 

 

 

Circon was removed too? What? Why? Wat's going on? How was Circon involved? :amazed:

 

Edit: People are mentioning that it was for Circon's Highway video yesterday. Personally I didn't think that joke was any different than his normal jokes, but I was wondering why he took that video down... I guess now I know...


Edited by Scorpiany, May 18 2017 - 17:22.


CapPhrases #15 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:27

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 7280 battles
  • 3,529
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostScorpiany, on May 18 2017 - 11:19, said:

 

Circon was removed too? What? Why? Wat's going on? How was Circon involved? :amazed:

 

Edit: People are mentioning that it was for Circon's Highway video yesterday. Personally I didn't think that joke was any different than his normal jokes, but I was wondering why he took that video down... I guess now I know...

 

wait what happened in that video?

_Gungrave_ #16 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 45486 battles
  • 16,299
  • [-SRP-] -SRP-
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Post_Bagheera_, on May 18 2017 - 16:52, said:

With probably the best gun soft stats on any american tank at tier 8 as well I might add......

 

Try fighting one in a KV4...

CapPhrases #17 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:30

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 7280 battles
  • 3,529
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostKamahl1234, on May 18 2017 - 11:11, said:

We deserve it. Remember the Krupp? That tank is a pretty well balanced tier 7 TD. Yet it was compared to only OP premiums at that tier and deemed "terrible don't buy" by most reviewers. Players want to play the best tanks. They sell well and we as a community are only further rewarding and incentivizing this.

They threatened a copyright strike on a video of a game and content they own, which was produced and the cause of a Community Contributor losing their title. It shouldn't be surprising that any company will try to take down that video. He's an influencer for the community. It's not good to have someone rip into the company like this, especially solely placing the blame on one aspect, rather than the cause and effect that is what is behind pretty much every game seeing powercreep like this. 

 

wait then wouldn't the blame just circle back around to WG for releasing the OP premiums in the first place? if they release those they only have themselves to blame when we compare everything to them. i get what your saying but this problem should have been nipped in the bud long ago. now we have to deal with the premium tank fallout.

Scorpiany #18 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:31

    Major

  • Game Knowledge Expert
  • 36872 battles
  • 13,028
  • [N1NJA] N1NJA
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View PostCapPhrases, on May 18 2017 - 09:27, said:

 

wait what happened in that video?

 

Circon said that Highway was designed by Victor and his kid going out to dinner one day. Kid gets food on his face, Victor wipes it with the napkin. Then kid sneezes and gets snot on his face, Victor wipes it with the same napkin. Then Victor decided to use the napkin as the design layout for Highway.

 

RIP two of my favorite WoT YouTubers I guess.


Edited by Scorpiany, May 18 2017 - 17:34.


Gothraul #19 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:35

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 2426 battles
  • 5,685
  • Member since:
    11-17-2014


otacon237 #20 Posted May 18 2017 - 17:35

    Major

  • Players
  • 25222 battles
  • 4,370
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012
Yep because balance. Soon there won't be any reason to play tech tree tanks, hell I already play only premiums and ru destroyers in wows. And that's bs that circon got taken down, the company made a statement saying it's ok to use their content and monetize. But as soon as you're even remotely critical they take you down. Glad to see this game is turning in WT, surprised to see they didn't take down Foch seeing how critical he is, bet him and Sahm are next. As a (very sparse) content producer myself this makes me even less incentivized to promote this game. Either ban all content or allow all content, can't have your cake and eat it too wg.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users