Jump to content


The new premium.


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

Sandsnake7 #1 Posted May 19 2017 - 16:49

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 2163 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    09-16-2015

(This is an unplanned rant, so yes it's lightly salted, unorganized, and grilled to a perfect 400 degrees)

 

So, the WT auf E100 was re added, but it's name changed to the Chrysler K GF, right? I just saw this thing out do the Maus in an open firefight and walk away with half it's hp left. Like what the hell? Can't stop breaking crap can you WG? The MM fix was a good one, but why did you go back to this?What's the deal with adding nonexistent supertanks for money? I get you need the cash, but try adding premium skins and possibly even tracer colors or decals. 

 

IT'S TIME TO RETHINK THE MONETIZATION SYSTEM



JOSEPHINEISH #2 Posted May 19 2017 - 16:50

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 19310 battles
  • 969
  • [TBOOM] TBOOM
  • Member since:
    01-09-2016
This K tank is not OP.

Edited by JOSEPHINEISH, May 19 2017 - 16:51.


eward17 #3 Posted May 19 2017 - 16:52

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 11370 battles
  • 386
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015

View PostJOSEPHINEISH, on May 19 2017 - 16:50, said:

This K tank is not OP.

 

Your brain is UP (Under Powered)

_FaTaL #4 Posted May 19 2017 - 16:53

    Captain

  • WGLNA Bronze League Player
  • 34892 battles
  • 1,385
  • [LOAD] LOAD
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
That Maus driver was absolutely horrible then, I could easily kill one of those with my maus with maybe 1-2 shots of actual damage done to me at max in an open field fight.  Apparently that Maus driver was straight on to him and not angling his armor.

haxmachine21 #5 Posted May 19 2017 - 16:53

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 11164 battles
  • 1,168
  • [ICB] ICB
  • Member since:
    12-30-2014
The Chrysler isn't OP. It's actually pretty balanced.....if someone in that thing was able to take out a Maus, then either the Maus player was extremely stupid, the Chrysler K player was lucky, or the Chrysler driver was a very good player and simply out-played the Maus.

Rommel85 #6 Posted May 19 2017 - 16:57

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 23063 battles
  • 472
  • [_D_] _D_
  • Member since:
    04-02-2012

View PostSandsnake7, on May 19 2017 - 10:49, said:

(This is an unplanned rant, so yes it's lightly salted, unorganized, and grilled to a perfect 400 degrees)

 

So, the WT auf E100 was re added, but it's name changed to the Chrysler K GF, right? I just saw this thing out do the Maus in an open firefight and walk away with half it's hp left. Like what the hell? Can't stop breaking crap can you WG? The MM fix was a good one, but why did you go back to this?What's the deal with adding nonexistent supertanks for money? I get you need the cash, but try adding premium skins and possibly even tracer colors or decals. 

 

IT'S TIME TO RETHINK THE MONETIZATION SYSTEM

 

The WT E100 was a completely different tank.  It was an autoloading tier 10 German TD.  This new Chrysler is a USA tier 8 premium HT.  Different models and everything.

For a tier 8 tank to take out a Maus like you said, the maus player must have been afk or some kind of internet issues, bc the Maus is quite beastly right now.



_Gungrave_ #7 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 36647 battles
  • 9,381
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

Waffle added back in as chrysler K?...you lost me at that point because I was laughing at how ridiculously stupid that sounds. :facepalm:

 

Waffle

- didn't have to spam gold

- had an autoloader

- could kill 2+ heavies in a matter of seconds depending on their HP

- could ram kill most tanks in the game because of its 100+ ton weight and speed.

 

Chrysler K

- only has armor on the front hull and turret

- good mobility

 

 

See where I'm going with this? I excluded gun handling because both vehicles had good gun handling.


Edited by _Gungrave_, May 19 2017 - 17:01.


the_dude_76 #8 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:06

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30223 battles
  • 729
  • [GSRM] GSRM
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

View PostSandsnake7, on May 19 2017 - 15:49, said:

 I get you need the cash, but try adding premium skins and possibly even tracer colors or decals. 

 

Considering how rarely you see emblems purchased I can't imagine WG would make much money selling skins or, God forbid, colored tracers. In fact I don't even want to see weird looking tanks or star wars lasers on the battle field and I suspect I wouldn't be the only one turned off to the game if they started to appear. Frankly the borderline anime obsession WoWS has is one of the things that turned me off of that game.



CavScout19D #9 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 24143 battles
  • 4,579
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011

View PostSandsnake7, on May 19 2017 - 10:49, said:

(This is an unplanned rant, so yes it's lightly salted, unorganized, and grilled to a perfect 400 degrees)

 

So, the WT auf E100 was re added, but it's name changed to the Chrysler K GF, right? I just saw this thing out do the Maus in an open firefight and walk away with half it's hp left. Like what the hell? Can't stop breaking crap can you WG? The MM fix was a good one, but why did you go back to this?What's the deal with adding nonexistent supertanks for money? I get you need the cash, but try adding premium skins and possibly even tracer colors or decals. 

 

IT'S TIME TO RETHINK THE MONETIZATION SYSTEM

 

Post the replay. Let us see if this was a "tank" issue or a "player" issue. We all probably know it was the latter. 

Al_Scarface_Capone_ #10 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:14

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30415 battles
  • 847
  • [TYPE5] TYPE5
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

Best Rant 2017~

View PostSandsnake7, on May 19 2017 - 08:49, said:

(This is an unplanned rant, so yes it's lightly salted, unorganized, and grilled to a perfect 400 degrees)

 

So, the WT auf E100 was re added, but it's name changed to the Chrysler K GF, right? I just saw this thing out do the Maus in an open firefight and walk away with half it's hp left. Like what the hell? Can't stop breaking crap can you WG? The MM fix was a good one, but why did you go back to this?What's the deal with adding nonexistent supertanks for money? I get you need the cash, but try adding premium skins and possibly even tracer colors or decals. 

 

IT'S TIME TO RETHINK THE MONETIZATION SYSTEM

 



Sandsnake7 #11 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:21

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 2163 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    09-16-2015

After 5 more games against it I admit I was wrong, it's far from foolproof, however I was ticked at how they add new premiums without hesitation yet still haven't fixed the current problems. I was simply upset at the moment and decided to vent it in the forums like people usually do.

 



Striker_70 #12 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 18776 battles
  • 5,424
  • Member since:
    04-02-2013
There's really no connection between those two tanks.  The Chrysler K is worse.  It adds nothing good to the game, degrades gameplay, imbalances matches, and increases gold spam.

Lesser_Spotted_Panzer #13 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:39

    Captain

  • Players
  • 65120 battles
  • 1,768
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012

Was the Maus a bot? It's the most OP tank in the game right now, and the Krysler is nothing special. I was playing lights all night and I had no issues dealing with them. I'm more scared of the Defender.



tanopasman62 #14 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:45

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 13964 battles
  • 2,093
  • Member since:
    12-13-2016

View Posthaxmachine21, on May 19 2017 - 16:53, said:

The Chrysler isn't OP. It's actually pretty balanced.....if someone in that thing was able to take out a Maus, then either the Maus player was extremely stupid, the Chrysler K player was lucky, or the Chrysler driver was a very good player and simply out-played the Maus.

 

Except that this tank is absolute cancer when you have to face one in a tier 6-7, do we have to stay out of our grinds every time WG decides to add one of these OP pieces of garbage?

CavScout19D #15 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 24143 battles
  • 4,579
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011

View Posttanopasman62, on May 19 2017 - 11:45, said:

 

Except that this tank is absolute cancer when you have to face one in a tier 6-7, do we have to stay out of our grinds every time WG decides to add one of these OP pieces of garbage?

 

Facing an IS3 is not?

JOSEPHINEISH #16 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:51

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 19310 battles
  • 969
  • [TBOOM] TBOOM
  • Member since:
    01-09-2016

View Posteward17, on May 19 2017 - 16:52, said:

 

Your brain is UP (Under Powered)

There is enough power in my brain to realise this tank is not OP sugar britches.Is it because it's black does that make it scary:)


Edited by JOSEPHINEISH, May 19 2017 - 17:54.


tanopasman62 #17 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:53

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 13964 battles
  • 2,093
  • Member since:
    12-13-2016

View PostCavScout19D, on May 19 2017 - 17:48, said:

 

Facing an IS3 is not?

 

IS-3s FLP is 180mm, which means you can shoot gold at it and pen in a tier 6.

 

This doesn't happen with Defender, this new premium or VK 100.01.

 

And unlike Defender or VK this thing can turn fast enough to keep its front pointed at you.



t8z5h3 #18 Posted May 19 2017 - 17:59

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 33653 battles
  • 835
  • [6-ACR] 6-ACR
  • Member since:
    04-23-2013

View PostSandsnake7, on May 19 2017 - 11:49, said:

(This is an unplanned rant, so yes it's lightly salted, unorganized, and grilled to a perfect 400 degrees)

 

So, the WT auf E100 was re added, but it's name changed to the Chrysler K GF, right? I just saw this thing out do the Maus in an open firefight and walk away with half it's hp left. Like what the hell? Can't stop breaking crap can you WG? The MM fix was a good one, but why did you go back to this?What's the deal with adding nonexistent supertanks for money? I get you need the cash, but try adding premium skins and possibly even tracer colors or decals. 

 

IT'S TIME TO RETHINK THE MONETIZATION SYSTEM

 

i think your thing of

Pz.Kpfw. VII and VK 72.01 (K) at tier 9

Chrysler K GF is a completely different tank at tier 8 witch has good armor but a meh gun... it should not be able to kill a Mous by it's self

 



t8z5h3 #19 Posted May 19 2017 - 18:00

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 33653 battles
  • 835
  • [6-ACR] 6-ACR
  • Member since:
    04-23-2013

View Posttanopasman62, on May 19 2017 - 12:53, said:

 

IS-3s FLP is 180mm, which means you can shoot gold at it and pen in a tier 6.

 

This doesn't happen with Defender, this new premium or VK 100.01.

 

And unlike Defender or VK this thing can turn fast enough to keep its front pointed at you.

 

the defender really can bounce some rounds

 



NomaeTheJester #20 Posted May 19 2017 - 18:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 12646 battles
  • 812
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
To all the poeple saying the new Chrysler isn't OP, it can easily angle such that the entire tank is 230+ effective armor. This means that just about every tier 6 and 7 tank CANNOT pen with gold rounds. There are even tier 8s that cannot pen the front with gold. IS-6 and KV-5 are the first that come to mind. WG has put in a tank that needs to be flanked by its peers, so that they can pen it with GOLD. If it had a frontal weakspot, with ~150 mm of armor, I would have no problem with the tank as it is. But it doesn't. I'm not talking about a weakspot the size of the KV-5's R2-D2 either, even just a weak machinegun port or a penetrable coupola would be fine.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users