Jump to content


chrysler k is so OP


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

Nubslayer #1 Posted May 19 2017 - 23:17

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24371 battles
  • 1,106
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011
it even broke the internet!

NiteDog #2 Posted May 19 2017 - 23:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 26154 battles
  • 5,246
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    08-09-2011
Al Gore can relax now!

saru_richard #3 Posted May 19 2017 - 23:22

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 18861 battles
  • 2,028
  • [H-H] H-H
  • Member since:
    08-19-2015
i thought we all agree that everything was OP

thandiflight #4 Posted May 19 2017 - 23:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 69066 battles
  • 3,708
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    07-10-2011
Except not so much.....but Wargaming says thanks anyway for the sales boost

bjorn1984 #5 Posted May 19 2017 - 23:56

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 17936 battles
  • 86
  • [-NXL-] -NXL-
  • Member since:
    09-01-2015

Yeah it's a gold digger. You need gold to fire it and you need to pen it from the front. Good job WG you really [edited] up.

 



Captain_Rownd #6 Posted May 20 2017 - 00:03

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 1771 battles
  • 523
  • Member since:
    09-28-2015

The WoT playerbase is UP.

 



MountainLion1 #7 Posted May 20 2017 - 00:36

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 17053 battles
  • 776
  • [TMBPK] TMBPK
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014
Since update 9.18 Tier VIII premium tanks are seeing bottom tier 80-90% of the time, no point in buying premium tanks any longer. I am playing WOT on a "free to play" basis since the last update. See y'all on the battlefield,.

Steamboat_Willy_Sr #8 Posted May 20 2017 - 01:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 37089 battles
  • 3,536
  • [FTRP] FTRP
  • Member since:
    07-11-2011

I'd like to share a thought...

 

Even before patch 9.18. there have been a lot of disgruntled players claiming that they would no longer spend money on this game.  Since the patch, there are even more of these claims.  Suppose players are actually closing their pocketbooks, instead of just making idle threats, this would actually hurt WG financially. 

 

How could they recover this loss?  By releasing premium tanks that go against their standing tradition of not releasing premiums that are better than the fully upgraded tech tree counterparts.

 

Is this one of those unintended consequences?



Nubslayer #9 Posted May 20 2017 - 01:10

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24371 battles
  • 1,106
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011

loss?

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!



Marzzombie #10 Posted May 20 2017 - 01:17

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 6353 battles
  • 383
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostSteamboat_Willy_Sr, on May 20 2017 - 01:04, said:

I'd like to share a thought...

 

Even before patch 9.18. there have been a lot of disgruntled players claiming that they would no longer spend money on this game.  Since the patch, there are even more of these claims.  Suppose players are actually closing their pocketbooks, instead of just making idle threats, this would actually hurt WG financially. 

 

How could they recover this loss?  By releasing premium tanks that go against their standing tradition of not releasing premiums that are better than the fully upgraded tech tree counterparts.

 

Is this one of those unintended consequences?

 

hasnt this company been losing money for years?

Nubslayer #11 Posted May 20 2017 - 01:21

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24371 battles
  • 1,106
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011

View PostMarzzombie, on May 20 2017 - 01:17, said:

 

hasnt this company been losing money for years?

 

apparently players quitting in droves as well

Edited by Nubslayer, May 20 2017 - 01:21.


nobodypanic #12 Posted May 22 2017 - 01:23

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 35194 battles
  • 12
  • [T-GBU] T-GBU
  • Member since:
    01-10-2013

they have removed posts about this tank

 



DarkLordSpaniard #13 Posted May 22 2017 - 05:39

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 9132 battles
  • 99
  • [SCRUB] SCRUB
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
I used to vehemently deny when people said this game was dying.  Now I think it actually is this time.

Mudman24 #14 Posted May 22 2017 - 05:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 35656 battles
  • 11,419
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

View PostDarkLordSpaniard, on May 21 2017 - 22:39, said:

I used to vehemently deny when people said this game was dying. Now I think it actually is this time.

^



RedBaronK #15 Posted May 22 2017 - 06:07

    Captain

  • Players
  • 34603 battles
  • 1,856
  • [MAIDS] MAIDS
  • Member since:
    11-26-2012
https://gamerant.com...nks-pay-to-win/

bundysj #16 Posted May 22 2017 - 07:33

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 47359 battles
  • 83
  • [UMM] UMM
  • Member since:
    10-05-2013

I'm fighting the urge to get the Chrysler.  

Wallet is closed, WG, get it.

 

The game is less and less enjoyable these days, how many others are playing less and less, I wonder.



DESRON10 #17 Posted May 22 2017 - 07:39

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 31968 battles
  • 446
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

Chrysler K .... my friend had one those back in the 80's god was it a pos to drive around.

 



Nubslayer #18 Posted May 22 2017 - 10:46

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24371 battles
  • 1,106
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011

1

    Object 907  32,857 59.43%
2     VK 72.01 (K)  9,335 58.92%
3     Object 260  11,960 58.17%
4     Maus  140,271 56.68%
5     AMX 13 57 GF  62,707 56.39%
6     IS-5 (Object 730)  11,250 55.84%
7     Object 252U  95,806 55.75%
8     Cromwell B  108,071 55.33%
9     Chrysler K GF  52,047 55.20%
10     T28 Concept  54,732 54.64%
11     T95E2 (small data set)  4,437 54.57%
13     T-34-85 Rudy  89,474 54.56%
12     Object 252U Defender  226,880 54.56%
14     VK 100.01 (P)  221,139 54.36%
15     T 55A  41,893 54.33%
16     E 25  203,995 54.20%
17     AT 15A  20,444 54.06%
18     113  58,036 53.99%
19     T95  92,312 53.80%
20     IS-2  43,068 53.74%
21     Type 64  221,403 53.70%
22     M60 (small data set)  4,200 53.69%
23     Mauschen  57,685 53.67%
24     T-22 medium (small data set)  2,327 53.66%
25     WZ-132-1  11,883 53.47%
26     T-34-85M  37,536 53.37%
27     Skoda T 50  192,075 53.24%
28     WZ-132  243,432 53.20%
29     Type 5 Heavy  99,448 53.16%
30     T26E5 Patriot  94,463

53.09%



F0R_M07H3R_RU5514 #19 Posted May 22 2017 - 12:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 42572 battles
  • 4,972
  • Member since:
    07-25-2012
Ironically, I was in a Tier 8 battle, yesterday, when a platoon of three Chrysler K tanks managed one shot of damage between the three of them.

leon_phelps #20 Posted May 22 2017 - 15:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 32142 battles
  • 3,105
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012
Best forest Gump voice "and just like that nobody was talking about patch 9.18 anymore"




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users