Jump to content


Is WoT Pay to Win now?


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

Marzzombie #1 Posted May 20 2017 - 01:56

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

Aight now that you clicked on that [edited]clickbait title

I implore you all to review this

HMMMMMMM I SEE NOTHING WRONG



Strike_Witch_Tomoko #2 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 15566 battles
  • 11,484
  • [2HARM] 2HARM
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostMarzzombie, on May 19 2017 - 17:56, said:

Aight now that you clicked on that [edited]clickbait title

I implore you all to review this

HMMMMMMM I SEE NOTHING WRONG

 

don't forget armor and mobility

 



Marzzombie #3 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:03

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

the armor doesnt compare, the chrysler's weakpoint is the enemy's 2 key

the mobility is less relevant, as there is a difference, but not so much that it matters

the point is that WG tried to give it the t32 gun to balance it, and still [edited] it up



Gothraul #4 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:04

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 1263 battles
  • 2,180
  • Member since:
    11-17-2014
Take a look how they made so many older premium tanks worthless through this crap. People moaned about the IS-6 and now you can't pay anyone real money to even play the tank lol. Its a slippery slope and I doubt that things are going to return to how they were before the massive power creep began.

Marzzombie #5 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:05

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostGothraul, on May 20 2017 - 02:04, said:

Take a look how they made so many older premium tanks worthless through this crap. People moaned about the IS-6 and now you can't pay anyone real money to even play the tank lol. Its a slippery slope and I doubt that things are going to return to how they were before the massive power creep began.

 

i loved my is6, but now i laugh as i pen their perfectly angled upper plate with my obj 252 with AP



Swell_Sell #6 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:08

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18785 battles
  • 145
  • [AJ] AJ
  • Member since:
    10-09-2013
The Chrysler K can afford to sidescrape and gold spam, the T32 cannot. The T26E5 can flex better than the T32 and has higher dpm. All the T32 has over it's competition is a great hull down presence.

Nonetheless, this game still isn't p2w. There are too many variables to make a singular tank that potent. WG could prove me wrong in the near future, but I hope that won't become the case.

BeanHoleBandit #7 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:10

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11357 battles
  • 696
  • [M0B] M0B
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014
Holy crapyou don't see a problem??? I'm not going to point it out for you.. But really you don't?

Marzzombie #8 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:11

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostSwell_Sell, on May 20 2017 - 02:08, said:

The Chrysler K can afford to sidescrape and gold spam, the T32 cannot. The T26E5 can flex better than the T32 and has higher dpm. All the T32 has over it's competition is a great hull down presence.

Nonetheless, this game still isn't p2w. There are too many variables to make a singular tank that potent. WG could prove me wrong in the near future, but I hope that won't become the case.

 

explain to me what a t32 can do hull down that a t26e5 cant

also the gun was the main comparison here,

but i ask you to go look at the skorp, compared to the borsig

the defender to the is3

the t26e5 is literally better in every single regard lol



Marzzombie #9 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:12

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostBeanHoleBandit, on May 20 2017 - 02:10, said:

Holy crapyou don't see a problem??? I'm not going to point it out for you.. But really you don't?

 

not at all. I see no issue with this

tanopasman62 #10 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:14

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 9136 battles
  • 653
  • Member since:
    12-13-2016

View PostMarzzombie, on May 20 2017 - 02:03, said:

the armor doesnt compare, the chrysler's weakpoint is the enemy's 2 key

the mobility is less relevant, as there is a difference, but not so much that it matters

the point is that WG tried to give it the t32 gun to balance it, and still [edited] it up

 

2 key from tier 8 and higher, and since that thing turns like a Hetzer forget about getting its side.

mrmojo #11 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:15

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17312 battles
  • 1,650
  • [-LEG-] -LEG-
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011

Is it pay to win?

 

Getting closer with every new premium released...



BeanHoleBandit #12 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:16

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11357 battles
  • 696
  • [M0B] M0B
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014

View PostMarzzombie, on May 20 2017 - 01:56, said:

Aight now that you clicked on that [edited]clickbait title

I implore you all to review this

HMMMMMMM I SEE NOTHING WRONG

 

OK dpm goes to the E5.. Hands down.. So give it the same place as the 32.. The E5 wins.. 

 

Pen the E5 wins

 

dmg the other two. But consider.. The T32 is outclasses so far by the E5.. The latter tank..  So at this point its up to the chrystler

 

wow just give it to the E5 other than on flat ground in the city the T32 shouldn't even be here.



Marzzombie #13 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:16

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View Posttanopasman62, on May 20 2017 - 02:14, said:

 

2 key from tier 8 and higher, and since that thing turns like a Hetzer forget about getting its side.

 

im lost. what?

Marzzombie #14 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:16

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View Postmrmojo, on May 20 2017 - 02:15, said:

Is it pay to win?

 

Getting closer with every new premium released...

 

WAIT REALLY OMG SOMEBODY SHOULD START A FORUM POST ABOUT THIS

BeanHoleBandit #15 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:17

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11357 battles
  • 696
  • [M0B] M0B
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014
So now its the E5 vs the chrysler.. Its DPM vs.. Armor.. Well your dpm no longer matters if i can block it.. ON level ground the Chrysler wins.. Hands down.

Swell_Sell #16 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:17

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18785 battles
  • 145
  • [AJ] AJ
  • Member since:
    10-09-2013

View PostMarzzombie, on May 20 2017 - 01:11, said:

 

explain to me what a t32 can do hull down that a t26e5 cant

also the gun was the main comparison here,

 

The Patriot can be pen'd with +200 mm of penetration on top and below the mantlet, the T32 cannot. While there is no clear difference in top tier game, the T32 turret can hold up much better when dealing with the highest penetrating guns in the game. Look up the armor models, you'll see what I mean.

 

As for the guns, you're correct. The Patriot has better firepower than the T32, I won't argue with that.



BeanHoleBandit #17 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:18

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11357 battles
  • 696
  • [M0B] M0B
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014
When ever you wanna vs SideScrape vs Hull down you let me know.

Marzzombie #18 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:18

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostBeanHoleBandit, on May 20 2017 - 02:17, said:

So now its the E5 vs the chrysler.. Its DPM vs.. Armor.. Well your dpm no longer matters if i can block it.. ON level ground the Chrysler wins.. Hands down.

 

the fact that the t32 is completely outclassed was the point, the point was never to compare the two prems (although i prefer the t26e5, it was balanced to strictly lose credits)

BeanHoleBandit #19 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:19

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11357 battles
  • 696
  • [M0B] M0B
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014

View PostSwell_Sell, on May 20 2017 - 02:17, said:

 

The Patriot can be pen'd with +200 mm of penetration on top and below the mantlet, the T32 cannot. While there is no clear difference in top tier game, the T32 turret can hold up much better when dealing with the highest penetrating guns in the game. Look up the armor models, you'll see what I mean.

 

As for the guns, you're correct. The Patriot has better firepower than the T32, I won't argue with that.

 

I'm sorry i've never been penned by much in the E5.. On the turret.. 

Marzzombie #20 Posted May 20 2017 - 02:21

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5508 battles
  • 289
  • [IBAD] IBAD
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostSwell_Sell, on May 20 2017 - 02:17, said:

 

The Patriot can be pen'd with +200 mm of penetration on top and below the mantlet, the T32 cannot. While there is no clear difference in top tier game, the T32 turret can hold up much better when dealing with the highest penetrating guns in the game. Look up the armor models, you'll see what I mean.

 

As for the guns, you're correct. The Patriot has better firepower than the T32, I won't argue with that.

 

so theres a marginal armor difference, a trade for better stats in every. single. other. category. is that balanced?

i did review the armor, the patriots turret is a little weaker, yet in game i havent noticed a difference






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users