Jump to content


9.20 Supertest of Rebalanced Vehicles: Japanese tanks


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

tod914 #81 Posted Jul 12 2017 - 23:04

    Captain

  • Players
  • 48598 battles
  • 1,486
  • [RDNKS] RDNKS
  • Member since:
    12-23-2013

View PostJoeBob4ever, on Jul 12 2017 - 14:48, said:

 

  Why couldn't they reduce the damage or the pen on the gun? 

 

 

This would solve so many issues of game play.  Reduced damage over distance, instead of mucking with shot dispersion, loss of penn over distance, armor changes, tank rebalancing, etc.  I rarely play the Japanese heavies, but I have no issues with them being heavily armored for their tier.  I can penn the 5 with tier 8 tanks with carefully aimed shots, so what's the problem?  Grant it, some will bounce.  It's a heavy tank, it's suppose to bounce shots.  Reducing the damage of gold rounds would be a step in the right direction.



Grasschopper #82 Posted Jul 13 2017 - 16:34

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 34481 battles
  • 4,262
  • [THUGZ] THUGZ
  • Member since:
    08-24-2014

View PostRagnarokBazil, on Jul 12 2017 - 07:47, said:

I LIKE  how no one ever considers flanking a heavy tank... Get it distracted Simple... After it fires you got 16sec of Open time to land a smack down on them.. Id say dont nerf the Maus and Type 5 armor UNTIL they nerf everyone's gold shells as a whole... THAT'S the real problem here not the type 5 or the maus.

 

Paris laughs at your assertion that you can flank a HT.

Browncow13 #83 Posted Jul 13 2017 - 16:46

    Captain

  • Players
  • 20613 battles
  • 1,074
  • [T-GBU] T-GBU
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostGrasschopper, on Jul 13 2017 - 07:34, said:

 

Paris laughs at your assertion that you can flank a HT.

 

Dat's funny -  French heavies - 2 speeds forward,  7 in reverse? 

Gramicus #84 Posted Jul 27 2017 - 19:09

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 11273 battles
  • 4
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016

Just an observation for the Type 5,

 

I seem to have no trouble being pened from the front with HEAT by tier 9 and 10 Medium tanks.....So now tier 8's have to get in on the act to?  Sigh....



mattwong #85 Posted Jul 27 2017 - 19:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 30254 battles
  • 17,072
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
People who complain about super-heavy armour always discount the fact that it's so much more difficult to evade fire in a super-heavy, so they need really strong armour just to survive at all.

JuvaDclxvi #86 Posted Jul 27 2017 - 20:51

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 12962 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012
Another dumb nerf.

Ruba_tanque #87 Posted Jul 28 2017 - 05:19

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 19018 battles
  • 354
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014

i'm afraid when i read they will touch in other update the kv line :ohmy:

 

Later, we will make a greater distinction between the IS and KV lines. Our goal is to make 
the KV line more relevant and affirm its role as powerful and well protected tanks.

make the kv great again lol :teethhappy:


Edited by Ruba_tanque, Jul 28 2017 - 05:19.


megaseth01 #88 Posted Aug 07 2017 - 03:43

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 4878 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-17-2011
we need a buff to o ho armor the tank is useless fighting tier 9 and 10 better yet why dont tier 9 and 10 fight seperatly from tier 8s and the type 4 and 5 dont need weakspots they are so slow and cant retreat from incomming barrage of tank destroyers the nerf is dumb i dont want another tank that gets no chance against smaller tanks head on like o ho the type 5 should remain as a competitor to the maus not a giant target that has no mobility




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users