Jump to content


34% winrate over last 141 battles since 9.20


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

Doomslinger #21 Posted Sep 04 2017 - 21:08

    Major

  • Players
  • 61714 battles
  • 5,767
  • Member since:
    07-29-2012

View PostHOTA_CHATON, on Sep 04 2017 - 14:37, said:

Corrections:

​So win rate doesn't matter (if you suck and can't carry much at all and need allies to carry you to any wins your lame butt does not even really deserve)?  Is this a news flash?  Be sure to wait for the trolls (players who take responsibility for their own performance in battles and don't shift the blame to other things) to toll you on that win rate thing.

Toll? Are you taking small payments from other players or something? Who are the trolls? I think you are one for sure with that post.



gamagrass #22 Posted Sep 04 2017 - 23:22

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 6038 battles
  • 183
  • [6PANZ] 6PANZ
  • Member since:
    07-03-2015
WR is subjective, therefore, it mean nothing.  although, you performance is looking good, however, you are decreasing a little. 

Tedsc #23 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 01:22

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 22688 battles
  • 319
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015

View PostTankFullOfBourbon, on Sep 04 2017 - 18:33, said:

 

Looking at your stats since last Wednesday, they are the same 47% win rate as they have been for a while. There's no difference. Where are you getting your data?

 

Noobmeter at time of posting.  The grind battles I sort of get.  You always lose more when vehicle is less than 100% with a  green crew (t-25/2 9% WR or FV304 37%).   But tanks like the Panther M10 solid crew and usual winrate at 56% I have a 12% WR over that span...

 

 



Tedsc #24 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 02:34

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 22688 battles
  • 319
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015
7 tanks currently grinding and only managed 5 victories today in 3 hours of play.

Scanjoon #25 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 04:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 24804 battles
  • 3,339
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

As bad as this game and MM has become since 9.19 (number of constant blowouts have qualified for Guinness World Records,) and as quickly as it has, only the most gullible would claim it's just a coincidence.

 

The game clearly has become a disaster, and it has to be an intentional and calculated purpose instituted by WG, profit ($) being the motivator. WG would have to know that the players would/will be leaving in droves. Therefore is the plan by WG to grab some last coin from the gullible and the hopeful before the turning off the NA lights and nailing the doors shut?

 

For me, not caring about stats (WR dropping like a lead ball tossed off a skyscraper) and never having spent a dime on the game, it's no biggy. For others that are stat warriors and spend real coin it's a "Yuge" deal and many must be packing their gear to move on.

 

Just saying.



Xenuex #26 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 05:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 36544 battles
  • 4,956
  • [MAHOU] MAHOU
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View Post_Schneller_Heinz_, on Sep 04 2017 - 09:21, said:

 

Quit playing Tier V and play higher tiers for a change.

There is a lot of new player on this game and also the server merger is not really helping to improve the teams.

It is pretty plain and simple, because you have more potatoes in lower tier and you get more losses.

 

no don't.

Viserion_Dies #27 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 05:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 30262 battles
  • 4,960
  • [FADED] FADED
  • Member since:
    06-19-2013

View PostTedsc, on Sep 04 2017 - 17:16, said:

This is spread out over multiple days multiple sessions.  To be fair I am still getting solid XP when I play well thanks to the missions but their are people who are AFK with better winrates.

 

 

 

why do you care? you are 47% 

 

you make teams lose. why do you suddenly care about stats? dont you play for fun?



eisen1973 #28 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 06:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 48253 battles
  • 2,180
  • [_B-Z_] _B-Z_
  • Member since:
    11-04-2011

View PostTedsc, on Sep 04 2017 - 12:16, said:

This is spread out over multiple days multiple sessions.  To be fair I am still getting solid XP when I play well thanks to the missions but their are people who are AFK with better winrates.

 

 

 

View Postflowerpower210, on Sep 04 2017 - 12:26, said:

It happens man. Keep playing & you'll get back to your regular Win Rate.

 

His regular win rate, lol

TankFullOfBourbon #29 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 06:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 21813 battles
  • 4,661
  • [DHO6] DHO6
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

View PostStriker_70, on Sep 04 2017 - 18:39, said:

 

What I'm seeing is a 38% win rate for his last 104 battles.

 

As I said, I checked his stats from Wednesday last week and it is 47% win rate. OP states that since 9.20 his win rate has dropped. I say it hasn't.


 

When you look at 141 games back, you are looking beyond 9.20. In effect, what it means is that his win rate has actually improved since 9.20.


 

Key word: 9.20

 



Tedsc #30 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 15:13

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 22688 battles
  • 319
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015

View Post_Schneller_Heinz_, on Sep 04 2017 - 18:21, said:

 

Quit playing Tier V and play higher tiers for a change.

There is a lot of new player on this game and also the server merger is not really helping to improve the teams.

It is pretty plain and simple, because you have more potatoes in lower tier and you get more losses.

 

That may be true but I would expect the potatoes to be distributed fairly evenly or at least the instances of being stuck with the potatoes roughly offset by the times I am on the better team.

Tedsc #31 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 15:20

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 22688 battles
  • 319
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015

View PostViserion_Dies, on Sep 05 2017 - 05:47, said:

 

why do you care? you are 47% 

 

you make teams lose. why do you suddenly care about stats? dont you play for fun?

 

The only reason I care about winning is because you cannot progress by just playing well (When I play well).  Yes their are plenty of games where I have a bad game and I don't expect experience out of those games. However I often have games where I do 150% damage dealt to HP lost, get a few kills and throw in some assist damage and I get less exp then someone who was AFK on the winning team.  I certainly did a heck of a lot more to help my team then the AFK person did, yet they get good experience for being assigned to a team capable of winning while I got lousy exp for being a top 3 player on a losing team.

Edited by Tedsc, Sep 05 2017 - 15:22.


docroberts #32 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 17:14

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17735 battles
  • 617
  • [TONKX] TONKX
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013
The other day just picked up like 3 win all day . So I said screw it and didn't even turn the game on yesterday . When ever they have a useful event then everything goes in the drink and turns out more frustrating then what its worth so haven't played anything the rest of the event . Teams were so bad my PR dropped 7 points with all the roll overs . All I kept doing was being fodder for everything . 

shaolinsarge #33 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 17:50

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 18347 battles
  • 534
  • [TRIB2] TRIB2
  • Member since:
    10-09-2015

Sincerely, i don't care about stats like before. You lose the important aspect of game, in my opinion, the fun of "play". All right, someone will talk about it; you're a tomato and bla bla bla. If have colorized stats made you happy ok, do it. By other side, if don't ; do not blame other people  about it , chat spam, insult ... It' s your personal objective,  color paint frames, graphics i prefer excel !

   It's simple choose your goal, and run behind him. I'm improving my stats naturally after the change of my internet conection. My next goal is buy the T54E1 almost done ! There are a hint said above, do not play low tiers - tomatoes are incognite... win and lose ... lose more.

Txs, commanders. My cromwell B is an amazing tank :) I liked



Morty__ #34 Posted Sep 05 2017 - 18:44

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 16359 battles
  • 192
  • [KANTO] KANTO
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015

Good and bad win streaks can easily happen over small samples. 

 

I played 50 battles in my WZ 111 1-4 this weekend and I did an average of 2087 dmg/game, 1 kill/game, wn8 1983... win ratio 38% over 50 battles. It's not like 2087 dmg/game is anything special but it normally wins more than 38% of games. I've also had very good win streaks in other tanks -- it all evens out in the end

 

 

 



Doomslinger #35 Posted Sep 06 2017 - 06:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 61714 battles
  • 5,767
  • Member since:
    07-29-2012

View PostTedsc, on Sep 05 2017 - 10:20, said:

 

The only reason I care about winning is because you cannot progress by just playing well (When I play well).  Yes their are plenty of games where I have a bad game and I don't expect experience out of those games. However I often have games where I do 150% damage dealt to HP lost, get a few kills and throw in some assist damage and I get less exp then someone who was AFK on the winning team.  I certainly did a heck of a lot more to help my team then the AFK person did, yet they get good experience for being assigned to a team capable of winning while I got lousy exp for being a top 3 player on a losing team.

If you really are doing well, you should be getting more courageous resistance medals in this situation and you would get the same xp and credits on that loss as for a win. Obviously you never did anything great in that battle or you would be getting that award. It really is not that hard to get. Get just one of these battle hero medals and you get the courageous resistance bonus on a loss:

Top gun, defender, invader, steel wall, confederate, scout, patrol duty, high caliber and tank sniper. Again, getting just one of these medals gets you courageous resistance bonus on that loss. If you didn't even get 1 of these awards, you really didn't do that well in a battle at all and don't deserve the extra xp/creds. 



ColonelShakes #36 Posted Sep 06 2017 - 11:13

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5555 battles
  • 415
  • Member since:
    01-17-2016

View PostViserion_Dies, on Sep 05 2017 - 05:47, said:

 

why do you care? you are 47% 

 

you make teams lose. why do you suddenly care about stats? dont you play for fun?

 

Hi one with dumb nick.  

 

You lose almost as much , with average stat padding numbers and high battle counts on the cookie cutter high tier tanks.  So, yeah , there is always that.

 

Only guessing here but by your attitude that you do not play for fun.  

 

Such loser.  Uninstall please.



BANG_UR_DEAD_1 #37 Posted Sep 06 2017 - 11:35

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 12697 battles
  • 180
  • [AMISH] AMISH
  • Member since:
    08-07-2014
Sad

bobdaxx #38 Posted Sep 06 2017 - 12:17

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 30930 battles
  • 181
  • [CHLLN] CHLLN
  • Member since:
    06-22-2013

I think the key is to never worry about stats involving win rates and how cancerous your team is-easier said than actually done-but just worry about doing damage and staying alive.

Play for fun and itll be fun.  Play for other reasons like epeen  you will lose focus.  Im an average player at 30k games but I have fun more times than not and getting rid of xvm was one important factor-having fun more times than not keeps me playing this game f the past 4 years.


Edited by bobdaxx, Sep 06 2017 - 12:30.


Striker_70 #39 Posted Sep 06 2017 - 12:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 18768 battles
  • 5,405
  • Member since:
    04-02-2013

View PostTankFullOfBourbon, on Sep 04 2017 - 23:45, said:

 

As I said, I checked his stats from Wednesday last week and it is 47% win rate. OP states that since 9.20 his win rate has dropped. I say it hasn't.


 

When you look at 141 games back, you are looking beyond 9.20. In effect, what it means is that his win rate has actually improved since 9.20.


 

Key word: 9.20

 

 

From August 31st to September 3rd he played 206 battles.  That means he's played well beyond 141 battles since 9.20.  In those 206 games, his win rate was 38.83%. 

 

Therefore it's entirely possible that his win rate was 34% for his previous 141 battles.



Yankee #40 Posted Sep 06 2017 - 12:58

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 34014 battles
  • 9,853
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010
Look inward




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users