Jump to content


is harm finally dead


  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

Postal_Monkey #61 Posted Oct 07 2017 - 05:30

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 28198 battles
  • 967
  • [BAKED] BAKED
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
:popcorn: This was a fun read

Rockstarxl #62 Posted Oct 09 2017 - 07:00

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 37027 battles
  • 778
  • [MAHOU] MAHOU
  • Member since:
    03-22-2013
I hope so

SilentPOH #63 Posted Oct 10 2017 - 00:33

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 33930 battles
  • 287
  • [HARM] HARM
  • Member since:
    09-12-2011
All I have to say is look at where they went and what they did when they left HARM.  TOGWR didn't hold them for even 30 days before they started to split.  Then a mass of them went to FD_UP(ELMO).  Does FD_UP look like they are better off after the fact?  The fact is HARM is not "dead".  As long as there is someone to carry on the torch, HARM will remain!   So how bout we let this thread rest in peace once and for all.

Strike_Witch_Tomoko #64 Posted Oct 10 2017 - 00:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 15574 battles
  • 12,103
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostSilentPOH, on Oct 09 2017 - 16:33, said:

All I have to say is look at where they went and what they did when they left HARM.  TOGWR didn't hold them for even 30 days before they started to split.  Then a mass of them went to FD_UP(ELMO).  Does FD_UP look like they are better off after the fact?  The fact is HARM is not "dead".  As long as there is someone to carry on the torch, HARM will remain!   So how bout we let this thread rest in peace once and for all.

 

uninformed

TOGWR joined with FD_UP as a sister clan.(they merged with us)
planning to put competitive players in FD_UP while TOGWR kept the more casual.

 

and they still reorganizing the chain of command.  with people switching between the 2. as we settle the leadership of each

 



PoopyMcScrubbins #65 Posted Nov 10 2017 - 16:35

    Private

  • Players
  • 17617 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    07-18-2012

View PostStrike_Witch_Tomoko, on Oct 09 2017 - 23:50, said:

 

uninformed

TOGWR joined with FD_UP as a sister clan.(they merged with us)
planning to put competitive players in FD_UP while TOGWR kept the more casual.

 

and they still reorganizing the chain of command.  with people switching between the 2. as we settle the leadership of each

 

Heh Where dey at doe? ^^



Luciano_Bradley #66 Posted Nov 10 2017 - 17:59

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 68291 battles
  • 510
  • [DD-S] DD-S
  • Member since:
    11-10-2014

  

no HARM, no FOUL I guess... 

 

 



yewchung #67 Posted Nov 19 2017 - 05:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 19166 battles
  • 4,380
  • [PLSGO] PLSGO
  • Member since:
    05-03-2011
HARM was never the same after PLSGOyims butt blasted them to oblivion.

Edited by yewchung, Nov 19 2017 - 05:36.


SpitYoYoMafia #68 Posted Dec 09 2017 - 05:43

    Major

  • Players
  • 18942 battles
  • 14,069
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

I remember them talking about enforcing wn8 before I was kicked out for tking artillery, I didn't really care because I was over qualified and possibly preparing to be a trainer anyway.

 

I questioned what that meant for the clan because I don't think that WN8 for a clan that's about building team work is a good idea and I could see why people were against it.

 

It was still fun to play with the clan but a lot of work was needed for 2Harm to improve a vast amount. Sad to see something like this happen.



SpitYoYoMafia #69 Posted Dec 09 2017 - 05:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 18942 battles
  • 14,069
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View PostDceriana98, on Sep 17 2017 - 10:40, said:

Then why HARM recruiters tryed convince me to leave 2HARM and join them since the moment I enter 2HARM ?

Are u lying here or were u planing to disband 2HARM months ago but u didnt have an excuse?

 

I was also asked to join HARM since I qualified but I didn't care much for it as I was just there for strike :P




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users