Jump to content


Ranked Battles Tiers


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

D_om #1 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 18:19

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 2563 battles
  • 10
  • [SFID] SFID
  • Member since:
    07-20-2015

I don't know if anyone else has mentioned this but have they thought, or are they thinking of doing ranked battles in different tiers like they do in World of Warships? I think it would be a great addition if they do add it.



zarg12 #2 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 18:22

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20615 battles
  • 924
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011
No. Ranked battles is end game content. Why would you want people bringing gimped vehicles? Would you like to see an amx 40 on your team?

Edited by zarg12, Sep 11 2017 - 18:22.


D_om #3 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 18:26

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 2563 battles
  • 10
  • [SFID] SFID
  • Member since:
    07-20-2015

View Postzarg12, on Sep 11 2017 - 18:22, said:

No. Ranked battles is end game content. Why would you want people bringing gimped vehicles? Would you like to see an amx 40 on your team?

 

​​I mean it as in you can only use one tier. Right now you can use only tier 10, what about if next season they use tier 8 only.

zarg12 #4 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 18:27

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20615 battles
  • 924
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View PostD_om, on Sep 11 2017 - 12:26, said:

 

​​I mean it as in you can only use one tier. Right now you can use only tier 10, what about if next season they use tier 8 only.

 

lol no. Again, it's meant for end game content.

Da_Craw #5 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 20:45

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22189 battles
  • 2,038
  • [DOG5] DOG5
  • Member since:
    05-30-2014

View Postzarg12, on Sep 11 2017 - 11:27, said:

 

lol no. Again, it's meant for end game content.

 

    There is no reason that Ranked Battles has to be "end game" content only any more than CW and SH do.  It isn't in WoWS.  WG is choosing to make it end game content (like the move with CW).  And yes, D_om, it was mentioned a lot.  WG has not ruled it out for the future.

zarg12 #6 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 20:53

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20615 battles
  • 924
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View PostDa_Craw, on Sep 11 2017 - 14:45, said:

 

    There is no reason that Ranked Battles has to be "end game" content only any more than CW and SH do.  It isn't in WoWS.  WG is choosing to make it end game content (like the move with CW).  And yes, D_om, it was mentioned a lot.  WG has not ruled it out for the future.

 

Let's put it this way.

People already complain about overpowered vehicles, can you imagine the absolute [edited]show having defenders, skorp Gs, chryslers, and lorrs running around? how about WZ-111, Super persh, t54mod1, T 44 100, T-34-3, Schwarz 58, STA-2, Lowe, M46 KR, Patriot, M41 90 GF, ISU-130, T34 (B) M4A1 Rev. AMX M4 Lib?

Additionally, ranked is supposed to be for the best players, not just "Ohey I have a literally 0 battles account, let me buy a defender and jump into ranked because I can"

the_dude_76 #7 Posted Sep 11 2017 - 21:28

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30197 battles
  • 728
  • [GSRM] GSRM
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

View Postzarg12, on Sep 11 2017 - 19:53, said:

Additionally, ranked is supposed to be for the best players, 

 

Wait... You think only the "best players" have tier 10 tanks???






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users