Jump to content


It has to stop now!


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

101MeatShield #1 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:01

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17086 battles
  • 590
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

These stupid defeats with only 1 or 2 enemy tanks dead and your entire team wiped out has to end...

 

VICE-VERA too, tired of winning matches and only losing 2 friendlies....

 

 

JUST SLAUGHTERS.......

 

 

YAWN 



Viper69 #2 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 7416 battles
  • 3,960
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011
Stop playing ransoms. They are after all random.

101MeatShield #3 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:11

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17086 battles
  • 590
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View PostViper69, on Sep 12 2017 - 20:03, said:

Stop playing ransoms. They are after all random.

 

I dont know what you are saying

GeorgePreddy #4 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 14291 battles
  • 5,652
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

Your request makes no sense because snowball effect battles are unavoidable without using dynamic rigging to ensure an even number of tanks die on each team throughout the battle which would be stupid.

 

If you believe SBMM will stop snowballs you are wrong, it would kill the game, though... it killed AW.



HOTA_CHATON #5 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 12097 battles
  • 12,399
  • [T0TS] T0TS
  • Member since:
    09-28-2011

View PostViper69, on Sep 12 2017 - 20:03, said:

Stop playing ransoms. They are after all random.

 

View PostViper69, on Sep 12 2017 - 20:03, said:

Stop playing ransoms. They are after all random.

 

They are only as random as the person(s) who programmed this game and I sure the randomness is something that slipped their minds while creating this game.

LeaveIT2Beaver #6 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:17

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 28007 battles
  • 6,893
  • [BRIG] BRIG
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014
Why would you come to the forums and post something like this and subject yourself to trolls and morons who will pick at you because they have no real life and nothing  better to do?

Edited by LeaveIT2Beaver, Sep 13 2017 - 03:18.


flowerpower210 #7 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:18

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 18486 battles
  • 324
  • [TUF] TUF
  • Member since:
    02-25-2011

Here you go:

http://forum.worldof...anting/#topmost



rokinamerica #8 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 4741 battles
  • 2,924
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

I agree:

Spoiler

 



Vladamir_Inhaler #9 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:27

    Captain

  • Players
  • 51986 battles
  • 1,840
  • [AC_DC] AC_DC
  • Member since:
    08-06-2012

View PostGeorgePreddy, on Sep 13 2017 - 11:45, said:

Your request makes no sense because snowball effect battles are unavoidable without using dynamic rigging to ensure an even number opf tanks die on each team throughout the battle which would be stupid.

 

If you believe SBMM will stop snowballs you are wrong, it would kill the game, though... it killed AW.

 

^THIS

 

Often all it takes is an early lead of 3-4 and the gun disparity creates a snowball effect. 'Balance' MM all you want, it'll still happen often.



echo9835 #10 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:29

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 12608 battles
  • 16
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    05-23-2014

https://www.youtube....h?v=2k0SmqbBIpQ

 



Slatherer #11 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 28237 battles
  • 2,762
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014
Op, increasing the overall skill of the playerbase is the answer.  Game outcome is only a reflection of player skill.

Really, there is no other answer.

101MeatShield #12 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:47

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17086 battles
  • 590
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View Postflowerpower210, on Sep 12 2017 - 20:18, said:

 

lol, it was written on the forums so it must be true.........

 

no other reason will do!



gamagrass #13 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:49

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5486 battles
  • 131
  • [6PANZ] 6PANZ
  • Member since:
    07-03-2015

View Post101MeatShield, on Sep 13 2017 - 03:01, said:

These stupid defeats with only 1 or 2 enemy tanks dead and your entire team wiped out has to end...

 

VICE-VERA too, tired of winning matches and only losing 2 friendlies....

 

 

JUST SLAUGHTERS.......

 

 

YAWN 

 

So what would you suggest?   Take your time, we will wait for a logic answer.

BigDollarBillz #14 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:53

    Captain

  • Players
  • 33885 battles
  • 1,750
  • [SBW] SBW
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
5 and 18 today, with a 24 hour chat ban. Been one of those days.

Lucudus58 #15 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 03:58

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14946 battles
  • 196
  • [LMB] LMB
  • Member since:
    09-06-2015

View PostViper69, on Sep 13 2017 - 03:03, said:

Stop playing ransoms. They are after all random.

 

you are just another TROLL and what he said is the truth and if nobody was pupping then why have the game.HELLO

Sturm_Teufel #16 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 04:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 40138 battles
  • 3,586
  • Member since:
    07-22-2011

View PostGeorgePreddy, on Sep 12 2017 - 18:15, said:

Your request makes no sense because snowball effect battles are unavoidable without using dynamic rigging to ensure an even number opf tanks die on each team throughout the battle which would be stupid.

 

If you believe SBMM will stop snowballs you are wrong, it would kill the game, though... it killed AW.

 

Dammit! He's right.

galspanic #17 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 04:17

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22134 battles
  • 2,962
  • [GUNS3] GUNS3
  • Member since:
    01-06-2016

View PostGeorgePreddy, on Sep 12 2017 - 18:15, said:

Your request makes no sense because snowball effect battles are unavoidable without using dynamic rigging to ensure an even number opf tanks die on each team throughout the battle which would be stupid.

 

If you believe SBMM will stop snowballs you are wrong, it would kill the game, though... it killed AW.

 

I feel like Tanks is actually pretty forgiving when it comes to this.  In Warships it seems impossible to win 2 on 1s and in so many cases the first team with a dead ship loses.

 



zarg12 #18 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 04:38

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 19713 battles
  • 835
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View PostGeorgePreddy, on Sep 12 2017 - 21:15, said:

Your request makes no sense because snowball effect battles are unavoidable without using dynamic rigging to ensure an even number opf tanks die on each team throughout the battle which would be stupid.

 

If you believe SBMM will stop snowballs you are wrong, it would kill the game, though... it killed AW.

 

Skill MM did not kill AW. many factors did, skill MM had nothing to do with it, the biggest cause of its death was how PVE was rolled out and never fixed, separating the playerbase in half, killing PVP and killing the game as a result of nobody being able to play PVP. Get your information right.

GeorgePreddy #19 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 04:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 14291 battles
  • 5,652
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

View Postzarg12, on Sep 13 2017 - 00:38, said:

 Get your information right.

 

I only spread truthyness throughout the forum... my info is indubitably correct.

zarg12 #20 Posted Sep 13 2017 - 04:46

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 19713 battles
  • 835
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View PostGeorgePreddy, on Sep 12 2017 - 22:45, said:

 

I only spread truthyness throughout the forum... my info is indubitably correct.

 

You are wrong. I was an early alpha tester and I had connections with OE from the inside, I know everything that happened.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users