Jump to content


The longest PVE Battles argument you'll probably read this year ... oh and poll also

pve

  • Please log in to reply
96 replies to this topic

Poll: Proving Grounds for All Tiers (111 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 100 battles in order to participate this poll.

Would you play PVE Battles?

  1. Yes (56 votes [50.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.45%

  2. No (55 votes [49.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 49.55%

Should other people be allowed to play PVE?

  1. Yes (64 votes [57.66%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.66%

  2. No (47 votes [42.34%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.34%

Do you believe it would increase queue times?

  1. Yes (63 votes [56.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 56.76%

  2. No (48 votes [43.24%])

    Percentage of vote: 43.24%

Do you believe it might bring more players?

  1. Yes (52 votes [46.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.85%

  2. No (59 votes [53.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.15%

(For fun) Remove Artillery from the game?

  1. Yes (31 votes [19.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.62%

  2. HELL YES (38 votes [24.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.05%

  3. No (37 votes [23.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.42%

  4. It belongs there (22 votes [13.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.92%

  5. I like Bacon (30 votes [18.99%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.99%

Vote Hide poll

ianizor1000 #81 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 21:57

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9259 battles
  • 1,367
  • [T_K_O] T_K_O
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PosttheSparatan117, on Sep 14 2017 - 04:42, said:

 

First, never start a sentence with "because". It's not grammatically sound. 

You're wrong. "Because the chicken was uncooked, Jamie fell ill." 



Sevok #82 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 22:31

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 36187 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostCapPhrases, on Sep 14 2017 - 04:05, said:

 

you're right, why bother reading something if it's long?

btw I hear books go past a paragraph so make sure you stay away from libraries

 

Like you've ever read a book.....

theSparatan117 #83 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 22:36

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 8385 battles
  • 621
  • Member since:
    12-26-2013

View Postianizor1000, on Sep 14 2017 - 15:57, said:

You're wrong. "Because the chicken was uncooked, Jamie fell ill." 

 

That would be a hanging clause, and the only time that because could be used. However, it still looks bad to start a sentence with because, and it's bad practice, as it usually leads to writing fragmented sentences. It's better to just find another way to write the sentence. 



CapPhrases #84 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 22:44

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 6074 battles
  • 1,670
  • [TXV] TXV
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostSevok, on Sep 14 2017 - 16:31, said:

 

Like you've ever read a book.....

 

that's it?

that's all you've got?

"Like you've ever read a book"?

a world of retorts at your fingertips and that's the one you go with.

*slow clap*



Elevendy #85 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 22:48

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17915 battles
  • 2,325
  • [YOUJO] YOUJO
  • Member since:
    03-30-2011

View PosttheSparatan117, on Sep 13 2017 - 03:16, said:

 

As if PVP is any better.

Being predictable is what inspires confidence from playing against AI. 

Not knowing what is going to be around the next turn is what makes it fun. 

 

Also, AI don't give a flip about their health, which will lead to a lot more "Oh [edited]" moments where people freak out and try to deal with a coordinated push by AI, instead of the dysfunctional soup that is random battles. 

 

Plus, AI pre-spawning on the field just like any other game in WoT will already be drastically different than AW's implementation of it... 

 

Your move. 

 

PvP adds loads of random variables and scenarios that idiots and geniuses can both perform.

 

I think you're taking the game for face value bud.



Sevok #86 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 22:57

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 36187 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostCapPhrases, on Sep 14 2017 - 16:44, said:

 

that's it?

that's all you've got?

"Like you've ever read a book"?

a world of retorts at your fingertips and that's the one you go with.

*slow clap*

 

That's it?  That's all you've got?  Slow clap?

 



CapPhrases #87 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 23:20

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 6074 battles
  • 1,670
  • [TXV] TXV
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostSevok, on Sep 14 2017 - 16:57, said:

 

That's it?  That's all you've got?  Slow clap?

 

 

what do you want I've got nothing to work with here c'mon

 



Sevok #88 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 23:38

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 36187 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostCapPhrases, on Sep 14 2017 - 17:20, said:

 

what do you want I've got nothing to work with here c'mon

 

 

You can say that again.....

ianizor1000 #89 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 00:29

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9259 battles
  • 1,367
  • [T_K_O] T_K_O
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PosttheSparatan117, on Sep 14 2017 - 15:36, said:

 

That would be a hanging clause, and the only time that because could be used. However, it still looks bad to start a sentence with because, and it's bad practice, as it usually leads to writing fragmented sentences. It's better to just find another way to write the sentence. 

 

​Yet it's still correct. Starting a sentence with a dependent clause and ending with an independent clause is a way to add sentence variety and when done correctly does nothing to detract from what you've written. I don't agree that because many people don't use "because" correctly when starting a sentence we should encourage people not to use it.

theSparatan117 #90 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 06:05

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 8385 battles
  • 621
  • Member since:
    12-26-2013

View PostElevendy, on Sep 14 2017 - 16:48, said:

 

PvP adds loads of random variables and scenarios that idiots and geniuses can both perform.

 

I think you're taking the game for face value bud.

 

Not really.. if you think about it, maybe 1 in 20 games played will have something you've never seen before and make you think on how to deal with something. 

The rest of it boils down to cat and mouse games of who gets spotted first with the better position. 

 

Instead of games where it's hunt the TD hiding in the bush at the back of the map ... you'd get games where AI will actively seek you until it kills you or you kill it. I feel like that'd be more fun overall. 



Roccandil #91 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 06:27

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5319 battles
  • 253
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    02-13-2016

View PosttheSparatan117, on Sep 15 2017 - 00:05, said:

 

Not really.. if you think about it, maybe 1 in 20 games played will have something you've never seen before and make you think on how to deal with something. 

The rest of it boils down to cat and mouse games of who gets spotted first with the better position. 

 

Instead of games where it's hunt the TD hiding in the bush at the back of the map ... you'd get games where AI will actively seek you until it kills you or you kill it. I feel like that'd be more fun overall. 

 

The AI certainly wouldn't be afraid to push...

the_Deadly_Bulb #92 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 07:53

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17663 battles
  • 1,658
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

View Postjohnmadara, on Sep 13 2017 - 02:43, said:

if you want PvE then go play AW... oh right its dead, I wonder why

 

This "busted clock" is was right.

theSparatan117 #93 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 10:14

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 8385 battles
  • 621
  • Member since:
    12-26-2013

View Postthe_Deadly_Bulb, on Sep 15 2017 - 01:53, said:

 

This "busted clock" is was right.

 

PVE is what is keeping AW alive. You, just like everyone else who repeats the same argument, are wrong. 

jamesboss #94 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 10:17

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 12637 battles
  • 132
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    12-23-2015

View PosttheSparatan117, on Sep 15 2017 - 10:14, said:

 

PVE is what is keeping AW alive. You, just like everyone else who repeats the same argument, are wrong. 

 

and you're right because you're a god  ok noted we got that zus

lionheart1118 #95 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 10:57

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 12827 battles
  • 305
  • Member since:
    03-10-2011

Jameaboss your wasting your time, I mean this guy thinks aw is "alive" lol.



Ape_Drape #96 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 16:22

    Captain

  • Players
  • 36433 battles
  • 1,198
  • [SOT] SOT
  • Member since:
    06-13-2011

View PosttheSparatan117, on Sep 14 2017 - 22:36, said:

 

That would be a hanging clause, and the only time that because could be used. However, it still looks bad to start a sentence with because, and it's bad practice, as it usually leads to writing fragmented sentences. It's better to just find another way to write the sentence. 

 

"Why not?"

 

"Because I said so. That's why."

 

That sounds better than " I said so because. That's why." which really just sounds like a poor attempt at haiku.



The_Royal_Penguin #97 Posted Sep 15 2017 - 20:24

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 10365 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View Postlionheart1118, on Sep 13 2017 - 12:52, said:

I did read, just because you say something doesn't mean it will work out that way. Either way you look at it it will pull a pool of players out of PvP thus making que times even longer and the mm throwing whatever game it can together resulting in more games where people are down 2 tires than we already have. If wargaming thinks pref mm tanks existing creates a mm problem then this would have a far more reaching affect. This is a dumb idea period. Deal with it.

 

tires? did you mean tiers?





Also tagged with pve

3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users