Jump to content


Isn't time to make more prem TDs? Very lacking


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Dirizon #1 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 03:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 25892 battles
  • 3,342
  • [KANTO] KANTO
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

I by no means like arty. I actually hate it. I think it is lazy and detracts from tanks ability to play as tanks. But this isn't about my opinions, but rather a topic at hand which WG could definitely add to and improve.

WoT has 2 prem SPGs, all low tier. Also they aren't part of the big 3 nations either, that typical players would have most games in. Think of all the missed out crew training, free EXP, and credits for arty players. This is incredibly lacking, considering the tonne of prem LTs, Meds, HVYs, TDs

Can we have some T 6-7 prem SPGs, maybe an 8? For Germany , USA, USSR especially. 

M7 4.5''  an M7 priest with the US 114mm

T117 an improved tracked carriage mounting BR-2, like S51 with stock gun

Self propelled Marder variant, mounting Bisons SiG33 15cm

just some examples. Sadly, can't use SU122l or Brummbar, because they would be put in as TDs.

BR-21 triplex would be a suitable tier 8, mounting a bored out BR-2 to 18cm instead of 15.2

 



Augustus_GoldNoob_Sohn #2 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 03:49

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 1032 battles
  • 272
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014
Slightly misleading title. 

Dirizon #3 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 03:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 25892 battles
  • 3,342
  • [KANTO] KANTO
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostAugustus_GoldNoob_Sohn, on Sep 13 2017 - 22:19, said:

Slightly misleading title. 

 

Tongue tied. I meant SPGs, thanks for pointing that out good sir  +1 is an order

for everyone else, l meant SPGs, excuse the 'me being a useless boob' and putting TD



Sam_Sanister #4 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 04:08

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23964 battles
  • 1,587
  • [N1NJA] N1NJA
  • Member since:
    10-11-2013
I don't think people would be too happy with new SPGs in general, let alone prem SPGs.
That being said, tier 6 or 7 would be appropriate tiers for prem SPGs.
Good enough firepower without being RNG reliant.

Dirizon #5 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 04:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 25892 battles
  • 3,342
  • [KANTO] KANTO
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostSam_Sanister, on Sep 13 2017 - 22:38, said:

I don't think people would be too happy with new SPGs in general, let alone prem SPGs.
That being said, tier 6 or 7 would be appropriate tiers for prem SPGs.
Good enough firepower without being RNG reliant.

 

this isn't about gameplay opinions on classes. And their performance, or what to or not to like.

 

It it is about class fairness in training, EXP, creds. All classes should have the option. And this is a class that is overlooked in prem market. A market l am sure WG can capitalize on big, and make extra cash. Especially since they are coming out with loads of prem tanks



SilverEaglewing #6 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 04:54

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29299 battles
  • 522
  • [NICO] NICO
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

Cause what we really need are more wankers in the back, but now you can make more credits and train ur spg crews to be even more camcer. GREAT IDEA

 



SilverEaglewing #7 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 04:57

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29299 battles
  • 522
  • [NICO] NICO
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013
Put the sy122I as a TD along with the bummbar. If those arties are to be added then make them as standard tanks. 

Isola_di_Fano #8 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 05:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 18560 battles
  • 2,416
  • Member since:
    11-05-2012

Prem arties ?

 

As in  we see MORE arties ... ????

 

No, honestly, no thanks.



Augustus_GoldNoob_Sohn #9 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 05:36

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 1032 battles
  • 272
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostDirizon, on Sep 13 2017 - 18:51, said:

 

Tongue tied. I meant SPGs, thanks for pointing that out good sir  +1 is an order

for everyone else, l meant SPGs, excuse the 'me being a useless boob' and putting TD

 

I hipenit didn't come across snooty, as it wasn't meant to be so. I do stuff like that all the time. 

Dirizon #10 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 05:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 25892 battles
  • 3,342
  • [KANTO] KANTO
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostSilverEaglewing, on Sep 13 2017 - 23:27, said:

Put the sy122I as a TD along with the bummbar. If those arties are to be added then make them as standard tanks. 

 

WoT implements assault guns as TDs, so as l said in 0P, brummbar and SU122l or even Semovente D 75 and 1O5 would be classed TDs. 

Standard tanks, lol.

View PostSilverEaglewing, on Sep 13 2017 - 23:24, said:

Cause what we really need are more wankers in the back, but now you can make more credits and train ur spg crews to be even more camcer. GREAT IDEA

 

 

l agree. Unfortunately our opinions and dislike, don't constitute fairness. There are people that play lots of arty, and it is a WoT class, so they deserve tools as well, to help them out. That is a fair concept. Be constructive, accommodating and accepting, rather than judgemental and discriminatory. 

Zennosha #11 Posted Sep 14 2017 - 06:16

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 8817 battles
  • 134
  • [NAISU] NAISU
  • Member since:
    06-26-2014

View PostDirizon, on Sep 13 2017 - 21:48, said:

 

WoT implements assault guns as TDs, so as l said in 0P, brummbar and SU122l or even Semovente D 75 and 1O5 would be classed TDs. 

Standard tanks, lol.

 

l agree. Unfortunately our opinions and dislike, don't constitute fairness. There are people that play lots of arty, and it is a WoT class, so they deserve tools as well, to help them out. That is a fair concept. Be constructive, accommodating and accepting, rather than judgemental and discriminatory. 

 

accomodating and being accepting of arty is like accepting that non-binary genderfluid rainbowkin attack helicopter is a real thing.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users