Jump to content


wheres the tournaments


11 replies to this topic

Raum_The_Smurf #1 Posted Sep 18 2017 - 21:18

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 20782 battles
  • 135
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015
when are the tournaments coming back its been 2 months and nothing not even a whisper out of WGNA about it

Waifu_o7 #2 Posted Sep 18 2017 - 21:40

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11801 battles
  • 695
  • [NICO] NICO
  • Member since:
    06-23-2014

No news yet (Or ever)

 

I miss Dance210! WHERE ARE YOU WHEN WE NEED YOU DANCE!?



F_Type #3 Posted Sep 18 2017 - 21:43

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17695 battles
  • 1,099
  • Member since:
    10-15-2012
tournaments died like two years ago

Devils_Bonzai #4 Posted Sep 18 2017 - 21:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 9863 battles
  • 5,589
  • [BOLTS] BOLTS
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

View PostF_Type, on Sep 18 2017 - 14:43, said:

tournaments died like two years ago

 

didnt die they just stopped making them, please feed facts

OctavariumDT8 #5 Posted Sep 18 2017 - 22:46

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 43045 battles
  • 701
  • Member since:
    07-28-2012
They are gone... My bet is they will make them just like they are on EU (broken, bad and not worth it - go check it out, come back disappointed and be happy there are no tourneys anymore)... :)

Josies_boy #6 Posted Sep 18 2017 - 23:57

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 53209 battles
  • 30
  • [CDN] CDN
  • Member since:
    09-24-2012
Wargaming, could your developers provide a status regarding the regular weekly community tournaments?  I am disappointed with the input on the thread I started "Player Suggestions to WoT for Tournament Design" intended to prompt development of a tournament that considers player observations.  However, as a baseline, it would be appreciated to know if tournaments are being dropped, changed totally from the most recent platournaments, 1V1 designs, or just being improved.  Either way, those of us in the "community" who've played on a regular basis do have some beneficial comments for consideration.  Even a salesperson will ask basic questions to discover the customers needs and advise on shipping date.  I just don't see any of that happening with the tournaments.

Hans_von_Twitchy #7 Posted Sep 19 2017 - 00:25

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 39670 battles
  • 972
  • [BAKED] BAKED
  • Member since:
    04-12-2014
Just one more example of how WG is a dying company. Pathetic.

mrmojo #8 Posted Sep 19 2017 - 00:30

    Major

  • Players
  • 19733 battles
  • 2,368
  • [-LEG-] -LEG-
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011
"Dance left and no-one else knows how" Maybe get Meathead to run tournaments, it will give him something to do other than the weekly videos.

roestreyev #9 Posted Sep 20 2017 - 13:58

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 32041 battles
  • 486
  • [SKORP] SKORP
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013
sux... was a great gold source...

SJ100 #10 Posted Sep 20 2017 - 17:08

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 53503 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012
Agree, it has been long enough. Lets get this going again.

cavalry11 #11 Posted Oct 04 2017 - 15:37

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 43357 battles
  • 33
  • [11BAT] 11BAT
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
WG only caters to high level players and clans. Us lower level ..... don't matter and never have.

VoteKickHacks #12 Posted Oct 04 2017 - 19:20

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9305 battles
  • 348
  • Member since:
    02-13-2013

View Postcavalry11, on Oct 04 2017 - 08:37, said:

WG only caters to high level players and clans. Us lower level ..... don't matter and never have.

 

Dug up a 2 week old post to say WGNA doesn't care about "lower level" players. That's gotta be a meme-what about the fact that we had tier 6 clan wars? 



Reply to this topic



  
For security reasons, please do not provide your personal data or the personal data of a third party here because we might be unable to protect such data in accordance with the Wargaming Privacy Policy.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users