Jump to content


- - - - -

WCFR Rules *READ BEFORE POSTING*


  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

Hillbilly58 #61 Posted Aug 02 2018 - 14:04

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 44315 battles
  • 153
  • [INSNE] INSNE
  • Member since:
    07-04-2011

View PostCognitive_Dissonance, on Apr 05 2018 - 12:27, said:

Suggestion for arty, no not removal or nerf per se'

 

Just like with the Swedish TD's, please implement a "setup and tear down" timer that mimics the deployment of a recoil spade. I think this will go a long way to adding an element to arty play that will force arty players to choose positioning and relocation more carefully, instead of just sitting at cap.

 

It will also reduce to some degree the phenomenon of artillery being able to run around in semi TD mode, and randomly derp folks trying to hunt them down.

 

I think artillery should stay in the game, but the mechanics are so simplified that there isn't much depth to using the class, like other classes that have to master with terrain following, flanking, armor angling, vision and camo mechanics.

 

I believe this extra dimension will make arty more rewarding, and less frustrating for those who must contend with it. Honestly, if this mechanic was added, I would play arty more, as I would be forced to think further ahead in order to support my team.

 

Thanks,

 

I would add that when arty gets a direct hit on target the the whole crew is dead and no 1st aid kit will help. A 155 round hitting anything destroys it no repair, its done. Thanks  

Gunadie #62 Posted Aug 02 2018 - 17:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 42174 battles
  • 4,876
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostGunadie, on Jun 22 2018 - 07:00, said:

 

And the very next reply to that is in violation to EULA rule 3.2

 

3.2 Hard-to-Read Posts

 

While posting on these forums users are to be reasonable with font size and color. Stick to default font size and try to avoid use of text colors different from black. The administration reserves the right to modify inappropriate posts and give warnings to their authors.

 

It really make me wonder why the Admins are ignoring to enforce their own rules!

Maybe because we have a planted Shill in our midst perhaps?



Mojo_Riesing #63 Posted Aug 03 2018 - 00:02

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18353 battles
  • 902
  • [ACATS] ACATS
  • Member since:
    11-26-2011

View PostCabbageMechanic, on Sep 29 2017 - 10:45, said:

Hello Tankers,

Welcome to the newest section of the forums - Wargaming Community Feedback Requests.  The purpose of this space is to give Tankers a direct way to give their high quality feedback about current and future World of Tanks development news and notes.  It will consist of threads posted exclusively by staff on issues that are of present focus to the development team.

With this power comes some responsibility. 

1. We ask that you take your time and deliver well-reasoned and explained responses - the better you state your opinions the more likely they will be to have impact.  
2. We do not expect perfect spelling and grammar, but please make an effort to format your post to make it as clear and legible as possible.

3. Debate and discussion are welcome - ad hominem attacks and insults of any kind are not.  If you disagree with another poster's opinion, do so politely and constructively.

4. Please take care to remain on topic - every single post should relate directly to something in the OP (Original Post).
5. Posts deemed off-topic or non-constructive will be removed, and repeated offenses will lead to warning points.  The standards for this forum are high - do not click submit on a post here unless you are confident that it does not violate the letter or spirit of these rules.

If you prefer to give feedback in a more relaxed environment or on a topic not currently being discussed here, the Feedback and Suggestions Forum is still here.
 

 

Cabbage, i have to give you credit for trying to do a good thing.  I saw this and thought..hmm, this could be good....but sadly most of the posts are NOT what you are asking for.  Anyone reading this now should go back to page 1 and read Tsavo's post...this is what i think Cabbage had in mind here.

 

Cabbage, my suggestion to you is...wield the power of Moderator that you have been given.  Delete all posts not in the spirit of what you have asked. Just...make them go away, there is little new, or useful in most of them.  You were clear in your directions.  Oh, i'm sure there will be whining and complaints of censorship and all that BS but..hey, they do that anyway don't they?  No matter what is done in this world...there are always those folks who pick it apart. 

 

Use your Moderator power to keep this as at least ONE mature and on topic section of the Forums.

 

And...kudos to Tsavo, Cognitive Dissonance and the few others who posted intelligently.


Edited by Mojo_Riesing, Aug 03 2018 - 00:03.


anonym_63LlYSJJqodW #64 Posted Aug 21 2018 - 00:04

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
    10-08-2018

Hey Wargaming!

How about you guys make it fair for New players and give us Noobs a chance. How the hell is it fair for a Player with less than 350 games under his belt to play against Stat padding pile of Crap clans that have 40k+ experience....Not to mention all the Punks that spam Gold round in low tier battles??????

What BS this game is for allowing that!

It's like taking a knife to a gun fight FFS.

This will be a short lived game for me!

Useless Game!



Phil926 #65 Posted Sep 02 2018 - 07:02

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 5310 battles
  • 5
  • [A-D] A-D
  • Member since:
    02-26-2018

Here's my suggestion:

 

I think one of two things would be good:

1.  After someone dies in battle they are no longer allowed in chat or to ping map etc 

 

or

 

2.  Allow us to only turn off chat to those who died in battle.

 

Reasoning:

 

The most toxic players are the ones who think they are better than they are because they're yellow on XVM, go out and do something stupid and get killed, and then start trash talking the other players and/or pinging the living crap out of the map.  The reality is though, there is no reason that someone dead needs to be able to chat.  They are not in game so they are not gathering any "intel" (such as, hey I'm arty and just saw a tree go down at B7, beware someone is in that area) .... they only reason for someone to chat is the occasional cheering someone on (which is good) but most often is the person crying and whining about other players.  

 

I know the option to turn chat off entirely is there, but there can be good things in chat too ... especially from live players trying to communicate.  So why not a happy medium of being either dead tanks' in-game chat being disabled entirely or the ability to disable just dead tank chat.



The_Iron_Bullet #66 Posted Sep 06 2018 - 13:36

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 17296 battles
  • 496
  • [AORT] AORT
  • Member since:
    08-28-2014

View PostPhil926, on Sep 02 2018 - 01:02, said:

Here's my suggestion:

 

I think one of two things would be good:

1.  After someone dies in battle they are no longer allowed in chat or to ping map etc 

 

or

 

2.  Allow us to only turn off chat to those who died in battle.

 

Reasoning:

 

The most toxic players are the ones who think they are better than they are because they're yellow on XVM, go out and do something stupid and get killed, and then start trash talking the other players and/or pinging the living crap out of the map.  The reality is though, there is no reason that someone dead needs to be able to chat.  They are not in game so they are not gathering any "intel" (such as, hey I'm arty and just saw a tree go down at B7, beware someone is in that area) .... they only reason for someone to chat is the occasional cheering someone on (which is good) but most often is the person crying and whining about other players.  

 

I know the option to turn chat off entirely is there, but there can be good things in chat too ... especially from live players trying to communicate.  So why not a happy medium of being either dead tanks' in-game chat being disabled entirely or the ability to disable just dead tank chat.

 

You can block peoples pings and chat. while in a battle if you right click someones name a list will pop-up, on that list is a block feature.

Phil926 #67 Posted Sep 13 2018 - 04:59

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 5310 battles
  • 5
  • [A-D] A-D
  • Member since:
    02-26-2018
Fair enough and fine and dandy and good to know .... but I do still stand by there's no reason someone needs to even be able to chat after dying.  

anonym_lNlaTMkrdwkD #68 Posted Sep 13 2018 - 18:38

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    01-06-2019

View PostThe_Iron_Bullet, on Sep 06 2018 - 07:36, said:

 

You can block peoples pings and chat. while in a battle if you right click someones name a list will pop-up, on that list is a block feature.

 

That's too much movement of rightclicks, and it can happen to you every single game for all you know. I agree with Phil.  It is an unnecessary/overlooked flaw.

anonym_lNlaTMkrdwkD #69 Posted Sep 13 2018 - 19:39

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    01-06-2019
Also, please change the quick-order button (Z) to include "Cover Me" instead of SOS.  It is a more versatile command.

anonym_lNlaTMkrdwkD #70 Posted Sep 13 2018 - 21:18

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    01-06-2019

We would like for you to fix the problem's some people have been having with spotting please.

For those who do not understand the replays on wotreplays.com, your WOT application must be closed in order to open the downloaded replay.

 

 

You are welcome to view my uploaded replay of this match.  You know where.

http://wotreplays.eu/site/4537269#live_oaks-pnr-t-34-85m

 

Here is the Edit, a second screenshot.

http://wotreplays.eu...ks-pnr-t-34-85mNevermind, I DID figure it out in the replay in Free-Camera Mode.

Turns out, it is completely normal.  Thanks for the T34-85-M!

Still, the replay is rediculous.


Edited by PNR, Sep 13 2018 - 21:33.


Badabingg #71 Posted Sep 20 2018 - 23:01

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 7040 battles
  • 324
  • [W-UN2] W-UN2
  • Member since:
    12-07-2015

1) Resource lists of     Community Contributors,     Streamers,      Tutorials

2) Training rooms for solo use, map training

3) Return PvE  for training, allow at higher skills level not just Tier2 . PvE  with the 3 player non bots had deteriorated , when it was used as a run and gun by one of the users who would snag all the target bots from the noobs, and then, given the slow load-in wait time  make the PvE an aversive exercise.

? If it is costly to WG, charge for training games/rooms (I pay to train crews don't I! I'ld pay to train ME ! )

4) Training rooms for advanced gunnery skills (?eg shooting gallery)

5) Keep WoT WIKI up to date!!!!

6) Decent ingame COMM system

7) Missions that use platooning to train noobs. Current system is poor see item 6).  Use platooning to Reward mentoring.

8) Ban in game XVM. Replace with optional ratings display, maybe. Seriously discus who and how it impacts the game among yourselves.  For many it is a very toxic influence.

9) Toggle slide for Fast Match Makeup vs Skill Based Makeup 

10) Again if cost is an issue charge us .if you can charge for boosters, you can charge us for options that help to train. Make Premium  Accts act like a resource.

11) Work harder to detoxify chat .   If you can animate grass that  one should be easy.

12) Do more threads like these

13) More forum moderating

14) Think about the different goals the players have and engage with more responsive models that are more inclusive of varying types of player.

DEFLATE THE ISSUE OVER LACK OF TRAINING

15) Develop mentoring programs

 

Thanks for listening

 

 


Edited by Badabingg, Sep 20 2018 - 23:04.


Wolfdingo #72 Posted Oct 17 2018 - 14:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 100503 battles
  • 58
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012
Ok on a slow day I have to wait sometimes three Minutes to load into a game. Sometime I got to start over again because no one is playing that tier. I have no idea what other are choosing for tanks. On top on the 30 seconds waiting to loading to game when it does pop. Then I get a team with 80% red players. Game over in three minutes. This is the reason most player quit playing this game.  To me this is a waste of six and a half minutes. get six of these in a row. Now we're talking one hours.  One mode I liked is that grand battle mode where we had thirty player. Tanks could re-spawning even after being destroyed. At least tanks battles lasted longer for all the waiting. :angry:

Wolfdingo #73 Posted Oct 18 2018 - 11:16

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 100503 battles
  • 58
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012
Well it seem new update looked me out completely thanks guys! :angry:
 


Bluedagger #74 Posted Oct 24 2018 - 00:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 33362 battles
  • 16
  • [L-O-M] L-O-M
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

Quite frankly, i havent posted much in the forums since i started playing.....

However, l would suggest that you review your "AUTOBAN"  process.  I fully support the player complaint ability in game when someone does some really unsportsmanlike things like extreme language towards fellow gamers or TK's....

 

But Seriously........   accidental TK DOES occur without Malice. (in the Real world its called Friendly fire)

 It happens, though hopefully not often where it would become a re-occuring pattern by any player.

 

Admitedly, i recently experienced this as i was recently "autobanned" during a Stronghold event with my OWN CLAN! {first time EVER Banned in the last 7 years of this game}   It caught myself off-guard and also my clanmates..... when it occured during a clan event.

I get it... TK is and Should be discouraged.... people get rage, or careless, or hit a key at the wrong time.... but having a computer automatically doing the  BAN process without the ability to understand a given situation seems  a  big mistake.

 

Friendly fire exists.... whether we like it or not...

So does TK deliberately.... for whatever reason the player does it....

it seems a bad move to let such a determination be done as a subroutine of a machine than determined or reported by people.

 

nuf said on this i guess....    

 

thankyou 



Harvester_0f_Sorrow #75 Posted Oct 24 2018 - 02:39

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 22530 battles
  • 487
  • [RDDT3] RDDT3
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013
Fix MM DUH, how is that? PR MM and +/- 1 tiers. Might be to little to late though, numbers have been very low lately.

Keep_Crying_lil_Fella #76 Posted Dec 03 2018 - 08:14

    Private

  • Players
  • 31224 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    07-25-2012
This game has become unplayable... the game favors preferred players and is rigged.  WOT will never admit this game is rigged but after over 30k games I have found it hard to find any other excuse.  How can one player be on a losing team match after match after match regardless of tier or map.  The games are not fair or balanced... so tired of logging on to WoT just to be cannon fodder for other players.  Games are complete one sided blowouts.  How can that be fun for anyone.  I have complained many times and one puppet actually told me that if I want a fair and balanced match I should play at a different time... REALLY ?  That is the closest they have ever come to admitting this game is rigged.  My win rate has gone from 49.58 to 49.26 and with over 30k matches played, do you know how many more games you have to lose then win for it to drop that far ?  Do the math.  The maps are too small for the slow tanks and the poor spotting mechanics.  I always enjoy being behind cover with cammo and have an enemy tank moving in the open not only spot me but get a shot off hitting me for damage.  Did anyone put any thought into some of these maps with artillery ?  NO... artillery in Paris is virtually unplayable along with other maps I do not feel like mentioning but I am sure you all know.  Today my last 25 matches I was 7-18 and they weren't even close... as if every enemy team everyone is using team speak or some other form of communication.  I could go on but I can't take it anymore.

Madgeneral69 #77 Posted Dec 08 2018 - 18:25

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28011 battles
  • 73
  • [-WR-] -WR-
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011

View PostSon_of_the_South, on Jan 13 2018 - 01:37, said:

I politely request:

 

1. Artillery toggle, allowing one to play with artillery or without it. This is perhaps the singly most hated part of this game. I have seen more posts requesting its removal than any other feedback left on the boards.

2. Skill based MM - A tier approach system based on whatever logic the smart people at WG can come up with. Most games can easily be forecast as loss or win, based on the skill base of the aggregate chosen to be on a team. Contrary to the posts of a few people on the forum decrying that it is fair, it really isn't. It makes one want to suicide out as soon as you see the team you are assembled with. I say this from the position of not wanting a team of reds. I can carry my weight but I am unable to carry a team.

 

I agree, when you have three very accurate arty on one side, it hampers game play. also the teams seem to be very one sided. Even if you are on the more experienced side, it is very hard to accomplish anything. I couldnt agree with you more.

Madgeneral69 #78 Posted Dec 08 2018 - 18:31

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28011 battles
  • 73
  • [-WR-] -WR-
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011

View PostBluedagger, on Oct 23 2018 - 23:09, said:

Quite frankly, i havent posted much in the forums since i started playing.....

However, l would suggest that you review your "AUTOBAN"  process.  I fully support the player complaint ability in game when someone does some really unsportsmanlike things like extreme language towards fellow gamers or TK's....

 

But Seriously........   accidental TK DOES occur without Malice. (in the Real world its called Friendly fire)

 It happens, though hopefully not often where it would become a re-occuring pattern by any player.

 

Admitedly, i recently experienced this as i was recently "autobanned" during a Stronghold event with my OWN CLAN! {first time EVER Banned in the last 7 years of this game}   It caught myself off-guard and also my clanmates..... when it occured during a clan event.

I get it... TK is and Should be discouraged.... people get rage, or careless, or hit a key at the wrong time.... but having a computer automatically doing the  BAN process without the ability to understand a given situation seems  a  big mistake.

 

Friendly fire exists.... whether we like it or not...

So does TK deliberately.... for whatever reason the player does it....

it seems a bad move to let such a determination be done as a subroutine of a machine than determined or reported by people.

 

nuf said on this i guess....    

 

thankyou 

 

I agree. I had a match where we had one arty and the other team had none. An individual on our squad decided to fix this by killing our arty at the beginning of the match. I have safe shot as one of my mods, but tks still happen. I apologize and keep playing, same if it happens to me.

 



Jootlash #79 Posted Jan 12 2019 - 09:15

    Private

  • Players
  • 46639 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011
I want to know y rng is becoming more and more random, how does a amx 13 with ap pen upper plate of maus and set on fire for 1500hp, Well i do have the answer, BAD MANAGMENT!!!! Y arent devs getting sacked? y is the game getting worse? answer, cause this is the only possible reason, and if wg deny this reason, then it has to be all the devs have an intellectual impairment, Wg is deliberatly destroying the game!!!! thats the only logical reason for, mm worse, rng worse, accuracy far worse (clearly 75% of shots are going to the outer 25%) how does a grille not pen a m41 rear hull pointr blaNK, is it rigged? that i cant answer, because that would take intelligence. SO EVERY PROBLEM FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT HAS BEEN MADE WORSE!!!! THINK ABOUT THAT PEOPLE!!!!! THIS DEAD GAME IS ALMOST OVER, THANKS WG

bbarton #80 Posted Jan 14 2019 - 18:07

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 33983 battles
  • 47
  • [DRKLN] DRKLN
  • Member since:
    08-24-2012
Is it possible to buy the ISU 130 with Gold? if so how? If not why not?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users