Jump to content


Does a new class need to be added?

T-49A Modern antitank

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

Poll: A new class, Rocketiers (28 members have cast votes)

Does there need to be a 'Rocketier' class for missle tanks

  1. Yes (5 votes [17.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.86%

  2. No (23 votes [82.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 82.14%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Systemrename190 #1 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 00:59

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15494 battles
  • 26
  • [SYS] SYS
  • Member since:
    08-23-2013
My answer is 1, but i'm here to see what all of you think.

Stormer100 #2 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 01:02

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 14769 battles
  • 266
  • [PRGY] PRGY
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
And my answer is 4.

HowitzerBlitzer #3 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 01:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 14994 battles
  • 7,824
  • Member since:
    06-16-2013

Yes - Wheeled vehicles.

 

WG will at some point if they get desperate. 



Eleven_Hotel #4 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 01:20

    Captain

  • Players
  • 86615 battles
  • 1,201
  • [1VETS] 1VETS
  • Member since:
    02-03-2012

Serb said when developing the game "No Smooth-bores"

 

Rocket tanks would be a Smooth-bores.



Yuri_Doujinshi #5 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 01:21

    Major

  • Players
  • 23021 battles
  • 2,971
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
The day they add missile launchers to this game is the day I and many others finally stop playing it.

AnimeCrusader_XVM #6 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 01:34

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 17367 battles
  • 431
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012
Replace arty

HOTA_CHATON #7 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 01:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 12650 battles
  • 13,651
  • [GOLB] GOLB
  • Member since:
    09-28-2011
My answer is bacon.  Bacon just goes with most anything.

Omega_Weapon #8 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 02:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 48473 battles
  • 2,064
  • [GRIEF] GRIEF
  • Member since:
    11-15-2011
I voted no to a separate "Rocketeer class". However I have no problems with some rocket equipped vehicles being added to the arty trees. Might be pretty cool actually.

Isola_di_Fano #9 Posted Oct 03 2017 - 02:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 22008 battles
  • 3,628
  • Member since:
    11-05-2012

Sd. Kfz. 234/2 Puma

 

needed

 

much

 

drooling ...



Ie_Shima #10 Posted Oct 04 2017 - 17:20

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 3050 battles
  • 247
  • Member since:
    05-28-2016

View PostIsola_di_Fano, on Oct 03 2017 - 02:41, said:

Sd. Kfz. 234/2 Puma

 

needed

 

much

 

drooling ...

 

​Must have.  

 

Need giant purring housecat

 

NOW!

 

 

(Writing like this is fun:))


Edited by Ie_Shima, Oct 04 2017 - 17:20.


64sherman #11 Posted Mar 24 2018 - 01:51

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 26197 battles
  • 447
  • [MOZZY] MOZZY
  • Member since:
    03-21-2013

View PostEleven_Hotel, on Oct 02 2017 - 18:20, said:

Serb said when developing the game "No Smooth-bores"

 

Rocket tanks would be a Smooth-bores.

 

The problem with smoothebores is the shell velocity, not the mere fact that the gun is not rifled.  

Frostblitz20 #12 Posted Apr 12 2018 - 22:04

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 3313 battles
  • 554
  • [VAHLA] VAHLA
  • Member since:
    03-21-2015
How about add in wheeled armor tanks/apcs or a speciality class like the m4 Sherman with missle pods or the German td/arty type tank that carries I think a 355mm cannon or something like that.


Don’t think in general they can make a new tree for every nation as there isn’t much left




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users