Jump to content


9.20.1 MM?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
47 replies to this topic

101MeatShield #1 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:11

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17614 battles
  • 604
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

Really? What was fixed?

 

What was so broken that needed fixed more than this?

 

MM-STILL-SUCKS.jpg

If my drain was clogged and I hired a plumber and all he did was polish the faucet do I still pay him?

 

Whatever man this game aint gonna listen!

 

Edited:

Decided to uninstall and move on!

uninstall-wot.jpg

Untitled-2.jpg

 



cnumartyr #2 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:15

    Captain

  • Players
  • 10044 battles
  • 1,067
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    08-18-2013

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:11, said:

Really? What was fixed?

 

What was so broken that needed fixed more than this?

 

MM-STILL-SUCKS.jpg

If my drain was clogged and I hired a plumber and all he did was polish the faucet do I still pay him?

 

Whatever man this game aint gonna listen!

 

 

No MM is ever going to fix blow outs.  Its a part of the game when we don't have respawns.

nxp #3 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:22

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35610 battles
  • 907
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013
What is your logic? How can WG fix people? People play games. No patch fixes wins and losses. Seriously you spent your time posting this? What is this post?

BattlecryGWJ #4 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 33245 battles
  • 7,072
  • [RSRDD] RSRDD
  • Member since:
    12-20-2011

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 12:11, said:

If my drain was clogged and I hired a plumber and all he did was polish the faucet do I still pay him?

 

Nope, but if your drain keeps getting clogged because you keep putting junk down in the pipes that causes it to clog, then the plumber can never fix the real problem, can they?

Blackstone #5 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:24

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 9388 battles
  • 663
  • [-AK-] -AK-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:11, said:

Really? What was fixed?

 

What was so broken that needed fixed more than this?

 

MM-STILL-SUCKS.jpg

If my drain was clogged and I hired a plumber and all he did was polish the faucet do I still pay him?

 

Whatever man this game aint gonna listen!

 

 

Sorry, you can't software update human behavior.

101MeatShield #6 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:24

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17614 battles
  • 604
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View Postcnumartyr, on Oct 18 2017 - 12:15, said:

 

No MM is ever going to fix blow outs.  Its a part of the game when we don't have respawns.

 

SOOOO that s it? Not even attempt to mitigate them? 

 

I am going to disagree with you entirely, the decisions WG makes is the direct cause of these blowouts that occur far too often.

 

The match I posted was over in less than 2 minutes!



101MeatShield #7 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:24

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17614 battles
  • 604
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View Postnxp, on Oct 18 2017 - 12:22, said:

What is your logic? How can WG fix people? People play games. No patch fixes wins and losses. Seriously you spent your time posting this? What is this post?

 

hmmmm

cnumartyr #8 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:28

    Captain

  • Players
  • 10044 battles
  • 1,067
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    08-18-2013

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:24, said:

 

SOOOO that s it? Not even attempt to mitigate them? 

 

I am going to disagree with you entirely, the decisions WG makes is the direct cause of these blowouts that occur far too often.

 

The match I posted was over in less than 2 minutes!

 

It's going to happen sometimes.  No amount of "fixing" will change it.



nxp #9 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:30

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35610 battles
  • 907
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:24, said:

 

SOOOO that s it? Not even attempt to mitigate them? 

 

I am going to disagree with you entirely, the decisions WG makes is the direct cause of these blowouts that occur far too often.

 

The match I posted was over in less than 2 minutes!

 

So post the damn replay and analyze it. What exactly did WG do to cause this specific game to be a blow out? Don't claim things without evidence.

65Camino #10 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:31

    Captain

  • Players
  • 28228 battles
  • 1,143
  • [2CMBG] 2CMBG
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

Metaphors aside, the patch notes alluded to improved matchmaking with regard to the composition of opposing units - more evenly matched with regard to tank types.

WG has emphatically stated in the past that skill based MM is not going to happen.



Awestryker #11 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 23416 battles
  • 2,158
  • Member since:
    01-15-2013

Play in carry tanks and carry your team...dont play arty...

 



101MeatShield #12 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17614 battles
  • 604
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View Postnxp, on Oct 18 2017 - 12:30, said:

 

So post the damn replay and analyze it. What exactly did WG do to cause this specific game to be a blow out? Don't claim things without evidence.

 

huh? No evidence? 

 

The sun rose this morning, do you really need proof? 

 

What is wrong with you?



nxp #13 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35610 battles
  • 907
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013

View Post65Camino, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:31, said:

Metaphors aside, the patch notes alluded to improved matchmaking with regard to the composition of opposing units - more evenly matched with regard to tank types.

WG has emphatically stated in the past that skill based MM is not going to happen.

 

Blow outs will always happen even with skilled mm. Look at lower tiers, everyone is bad yet blow outs are happening all the time. 

101MeatShield #14 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:34

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17614 battles
  • 604
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

You know what, nevermind...

 

I am installing something that rhymes with "STEAM"

 

Peace out WG, from top to bottom your community is atrocious and toxic!


Edited by 101MeatShield, Oct 18 2017 - 19:35.


nxp #15 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:35

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35610 battles
  • 907
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:33, said:

 

huh? No evidence? 

 

The sun rose this morning, do you really need proof? 

 

What is wrong with you?

 

Keep believing all the BS that you are putting in your brain. Because none of that will help you win more games. And sadly you want to win more but you just don't know how. 

cnumartyr #16 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:35

    Captain

  • Players
  • 10044 battles
  • 1,067
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    08-18-2013

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:34, said:

You know what, nevermind...

 

I am installing something that rhimes with "STEAM"

 

Peace out WG, fom top to bottom your community is atrocious!

 

Best of luck.



MacDaddyMatty #17 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:43

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17708 battles
  • 3,542
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    10-07-2016

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:34, said:

I am installing something that rhymes with "STEAM"

 

 

"Meme"?

 

I had some suck games this weekend.

My fault, not the games.

Bad decisions and badly aimed shots.

Did have a few RNG-hates-me-moments, but they did not sway the outcome.


 

GL with wherever you end up!

:honoring:



xrays_ #18 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 43132 battles
  • 2,803
  • [FELOW] FELOW
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:11, said:

Decided to uninstall and move on!

 

Anyone else happy about this statement?

 

x.



101MeatShield #19 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:50

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17614 battles
  • 604
  • [CLOAK] CLOAK
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View Postnxp, on Oct 18 2017 - 12:35, said:

 

Keep believing all the BS that you are putting in your brain. Because none of that will help you win more games. And sadly you want to win more but you just don't know how. 

 

I never once cared about wins or losses..

 

A loss because teammates were idiots is one thing but this entire "Feast and Famine" thing is a waste of time... 

 

Being on the giving end of a slaughter is equally as frustrating as the receiving end..

 

I enjoy the competition! So when the first two games I play after a patch that is intended to make MM better are slaughters and 2 of the worst slaughters ever.. LITERALLY under 2 minutes and my entire team was dead.. 

 

Clearly WG does not take the issues I have serious, so this game simply is not for me!

 

Maybe it is great for you! 

 

Maybe you just have a really low standard. 

 

Maybe you are just so poor that you cant afford to pay for entertaining games.. 

 

Lots of maybes here except for one,

 

THIS GAME PLAYS LIKE IT IS STILL IN BETA TESTING!



Doomslinger__ #20 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 19:50

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 21 battles
  • 249
  • Member since:
    10-09-2017
You are blaming the mm but the mm only selects players that are in the que. The majority of players in random battles are bad at the game at all tiers so what can you expect? I am guessing that a large percentage of players just want to zombie grind up the tech trees to higher tiers so they rush out and get 1 shot of damage average in most battles to do that. I guess you could blame wg for designing a game that allows players to work up the tech trees by playing like that. Those players make the battles chaotic. But, it appears you like to play arty a lot so one less arty player in the game sounds good to me. Now, only if we could get rid of the rest of them.

Edited by Doomslinger__, Oct 18 2017 - 19:53.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users