Jump to content

9.20.1 MM?

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
47 replies to this topic

cnumartyr #41 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 21:19


  • Players
  • 10899 battles
  • 1,323
  • Member since:

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 15:16, said:


Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner....


WG wants to sell thier system to other game makers, meanwhile the rest of the world is laughing at them for their ignorance..


WG thinks they are the first people to ever come up with this idea, the truth is most have and easily dismiss it because... WELL IT IS STUPID and dishonest! Nothing but a rabbit hole!


Why are you here?

Dogsoldier6 #42 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 21:25


  • Players
  • 57929 battles
  • 2,771
  • [DD-S] DD-S
  • Member since:

View Postcnumartyr, on Oct 18 2017 - 21:19, said:


Why are you here?


He really doesn't know that either.....................

moogleslam #43 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 22:13


  • Players
  • 38983 battles
  • 4,126
  • Member since:
You could have 100% balanced teams in terms of both tanks and skill level of players in those tanks, and still get 15-0, 15-1, 15-2, etc battles.  The snowball effect.

Doomslinger__ #44 Posted Oct 18 2017 - 23:54

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 21 battles
  • 483
  • Member since:

I think it's time we all abandon this thread...you can't fix stupid.

Jer1413 #45 Posted Oct 19 2017 - 00:30


  • Players
  • 43776 battles
  • 1,095
  • [RR13] RR13
  • Member since:

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 19:31, said:



I play ARTY all day every day 


'nuff said...

Gurgar #46 Posted Oct 19 2017 - 00:48


  • Players
  • 28644 battles
  • 230
  • Member since:

View Post101MeatShield, on Oct 18 2017 - 19:33, said:


huh? No evidence? 


The sun rose this morning, do you really need proof? 


What is wrong with you?


The sun didn't rise, it is in the same spot always. We circle it on a rotation. wthdoes that have to do with your loss battle.

You play arty, TD's and a couple of padder tanks in mostly low tiers with an average damage that barely qualifies as help, yet, you are complaining that WG doesn't help give you a bigger crutch.

That is the human factor that people are trying to explain that can't be fixed.

docroberts #47 Posted Oct 19 2017 - 02:55


  • Players
  • 19085 battles
  • 1,353
  • Member since:
Matched , unmatched , skill or unskilled . Fixed or unfixed . I don't know then reading about Activision getting a patent on there gaming to induce micro transaction MM .. 1 to 25 xp conversation on gold compared to other games 1 to 45 . Cost to convert gold to silver is ridicules . Crap games , Crap XP . Crap earnings . Kind of sounds a bit familiar just to try to grind out tanks in this game cause it is made to take longer than most other games and for the bonus round they will sell you a nice new premium tank with leather trim  . Not to mention they used to sell preem ammo for gold only so we had to use our earnings from clan wars and tournaments . ... Now much later in the game consumables are added to be used more often unlike they wernt used hardly at all years past  . And the part of aiming that you don't see is the aiming mechanics circle for shell dispersion is made larger . The RNG percent is the same but the Circle is larger . So your pattern is further off more times than not so we end up derping the dirt 5 to 7 times in a row at a staggering cost of credits for a resupply ... I'm really starting to wonder about what we don't know . But I'm probably wrong . 

VooDooKobra #48 Posted Oct 19 2017 - 06:24


  • Players
  • 8302 battles
  • 3,944
  • Member since:

View PostSacula, on Oct 18 2017 - 13:11, said:

None of these changes that WG is doing were ever going to fix the problem with 15-0,15-1 etc wipeouts. They could have saved themselves a lot of time and money by using an ELO rating like every other PVP game in the world uses.


You don't need to have all the terrible players playing each other just make it so each team has about the same number of good/bad players matched up.


how many of those PVP games are team based though, you have to remember elo was originally made for 1v1 games like chess.  as well from what i have been finding so far players in games that use elo hate it and do not feel it works very well

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users