Jump to content


Well Played WG... Well Played

IS-6B

  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

Plays_With_Matches #1 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 06:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 26039 battles
  • 2,473
  • [GUNS6] GUNS6
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

All I got to say is well played on Day 19th... I thought I was going to have an easy day but man that bait and switch...

 

Anyways, had 14 tokens and was ready to grind out my 30th battles yesterday and logged into find the mission requirements had changes to 30 Wins. Cause I have loads of time to run that many battles with a 6 kids at home (one 6months old). Anyhow, no problem I'll just finish it on Day 20. Guess how that went... 4 kills in feeling pretty good... top tier in my Type 64... wham... [edited] by an arty. 

 

Log story short, you beat me. the wallet is open, I am buying your 5 token package and I'm going to bed.

 

 



Xeraux #2 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 06:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 19407 battles
  • 9,367
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011
I don't see any of this as WG's fault.

Insurrectional_Leftist #3 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 06:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 45408 battles
  • 6,157
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostXeraux, on Nov 21 2017 - 05:44, said:

I don't see any of this as WG's fault.

 

Just Wow,,,, just wow.....  you really take the cake. 

Jolly33 #4 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 06:57

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37893 battles
  • 230
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

All the previous battle count missions were wins...should have been no surprise that day 19 was 30 wins.

 



Scorpiany #5 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:00

    Major

  • Community Contributor
  • 30491 battles
  • 11,202
  • [N1NJA] N1NJA
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View PostXeraux, on Nov 20 2017 - 21:44, said:

I don't see any of this as WG's fault.

 

How? On the website, which players used to plan their mission grind, it clearly stated 30 battles played, in top 10 XP. Then in-game today, it changed to 30 wins. There is a HUGE difference between 30 battles and 30 wins. Even those with a decent amount of free time will find 30 wins practically impossible to do during the day.

 


Edited by Scorpiany, Nov 21 2017 - 07:09.


Plays_With_Matches #6 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 26039 battles
  • 2,473
  • [GUNS6] GUNS6
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostXeraux, on Nov 21 2017 - 00:44, said:

I don't see any of this as WG's fault.

Advertised mission requirements incorrectly, any other would honour an advertised cost.

View PostJolly33, on Nov 21 2017 - 00:57, said:

All the previous battle count missions were wins...should have been no surprise that day 19 was 30 wins.

 

Mission requirements were clearly published on day one. End of story



ShaolinWombat #7 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:03

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 8153 battles
  • 157
  • [CVF] CVF
  • Member since:
    01-21-2017
WGNA advertised something for 18 days without correction.  There were multiple threads noting it was an easy day.  And we should just assume they made a mistake!?!    Then why tell us anything in advance?

Xeraux #8 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 19407 battles
  • 9,367
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011

View PostInsurrectional_Leftist, on Nov 20 2017 - 21:57, said:

 

Just Wow,,,, just wow.....  you really take the cake. 

No foresight, assuming that since all the other missions were wins, this won't be, just because WG didn't specify wins.

Isn't able to play the required number of games.

Gives up on getting 5 kills in a battle.

 

None of those are WarGaming's responsibility. Hence my comment.



Xeraux #9 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 19407 battles
  • 9,367
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011

View PostScorpiany, on Nov 20 2017 - 22:00, said:

 

How? On the website, which players used to plan their mission grind, it clearly stated 30 battles played, in top 10 XP. Then in-game today, it changed to 30 wins. There is a HUGE difference between 30 battles and 30 wins. Even those with a decent amount of free time will find 30 wins practically impossible to do during the day.

It's a logical jump from an increasing number of wins to assume it's a win mission. Disregarding that, see my post just above this for the full reply to "how".



Plays_With_Matches #10 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 26039 battles
  • 2,473
  • [GUNS6] GUNS6
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostXeraux, on Nov 21 2017 - 01:05, said:

It's a logical jump from an increasing number of wins to assume it's a win mission. Disregarding that, see my post just above this for the full reply to "how".

 

of course going from 30wins to a single 5 kill game is a logical jump as well

 

go troll someone else’s thread



Xeraux #11 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:08

    Major

  • Players
  • 19407 battles
  • 9,367
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011

View PostPlays_With_Matches, on Nov 20 2017 - 22:07, said:

 

of course going from 30wins to a single 5 kill game is a logical jump as well

An easy giveaway mission at the end? I don't see why not.

5 kills for 5+5+5 reserves...



Insurrectional_Leftist #12 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 45408 battles
  • 6,157
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostXeraux, on Nov 21 2017 - 06:04, said:

No foresight, assuming that since all the other missions were wins, this won't be, just because WG didn't specify wins.

Isn't able to play the required number of games.

Gives up on getting 5 kills in a battle.

 

None of those are WarGaming's responsibility. Hence my comment.

How can you not see what they are doing here? How can you keep defending their actions on how their running this mission? This is unprecedented what they are doing. Take a look at Scorpianys remarks.  I think he did a rather good job explaining that actually. I’m trying to present an issue upon your take, but I don’t understand how in the face of the glaring facts the players can all be wrong on this. 



Xeraux #13 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 19407 battles
  • 9,367
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011

View PostInsurrectional_Leftist, on Nov 20 2017 - 22:10, said:

How can you not see what they are doing here? How can you keep defending their actions on how their running this mission? This is unprecedented what they are doing. Take a look at Scorpianys remarks.  I think he did a rather good job explaining that actually. I’m trying to present an issue upon your take, but I don’t understand how in the face of the glaring facts the players can all be wrong on this. 

I never said the player was wrong. I said it wasn't WG's fault he didn't complete the missions, he was just unable to.

And I guess Day 20 is his fault, he did state he'd given up.



Scorpiany #14 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:22

    Major

  • Community Contributor
  • 30491 battles
  • 11,202
  • [N1NJA] N1NJA
  • Member since:
    06-27-2013

View PostXeraux, on Nov 20 2017 - 22:18, said:

I never said the player was wrong. I said it wasn't WG's fault he didn't complete the missions, he was just unable to.

And I guess Day 20 is his fault, he did state he'd given up.

 

It's WG's fault that they didn't accurately label the missions. By your very own logic, of Day 20 being an "easy day" - Why couldn't Day 19 be just that, an "easier day", as a break from the win missions? You can't say the player was at fault for not completing the mission, when the mission requirements changed to something much higher when the day actually came around. We're supposed to be able to plan by official information, not get confused by it.

JakeTheMystic #15 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:23

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 18690 battles
  • 343
  • [O-VER] O-VER
  • Member since:
    12-30-2011

View PostPlays_With_Matches, on Nov 20 2017 - 22:07, said:

 

of course going from 30wins to a single 5 kill game is a logical jump as well

 

go troll someone else’s thread

 

Wargaming gave out 3 tier 8 premiums and people still have to find something to complain about. If you had to prepare mentally that far ahead of time but get salted when the day comes and the tanks not handed to you, thats your fault for thinking that something would get progressively easier when the previous 17 days continued to get harder. Stop being a freeloader and actually work for once. 

Double edit; Grammar 


Edited by JakeTheMystic, Nov 21 2017 - 07:27.


Xeraux #16 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 19407 battles
  • 9,367
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011

View PostScorpiany, on Nov 20 2017 - 22:22, said:

 

It's WG's fault that they didn't accurately label the missions. By your very own logic, of Day 20 being an "easy day" - Why couldn't Day 19 be just that, an "easier day", as a break from the win missions? You can't say the player was at fault for not completing the mission, when the mission requirements changed to something much higher when the day actually came around. We're supposed to be able to plan by official information, not get confused by it.

All I'm saying is I read the mission as 30 wins, since I was absolutely certain WG would continue their pattern.

Having an easy Day 20 makes total sense. Having 19 and 20, that's kinda iffy.

If you're PO'd that WG mislabeled a mission, great. Be PO'd. But what else do you expect from a company that released their "pubic test server?"

 



Insurrectional_Leftist #17 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 45408 battles
  • 6,157
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostJakeTheMystic, on Nov 21 2017 - 06:23, said:

 

Wargaming gave out 3 tier 8 premiums and people still have to find something to complain about. If you had to prepare mentally that far ahead of time but get salted when the day comes and the tanks not handed to you, thats your fault for thinking that something would get progressively easier when the previous 17 days continued to get harder. Stop being a freeloader and actually work for once. 

Double edit; Grammar 

 

We are getting really tired of ridiculous post like this one that throws the player base under the bus and calls them lazy free loaders for seeing what Wargaming is doing with a so-called free premium tank mission (Not) to beat and gouge, pressure, and use scam tactics to rail money out of. 

 

We  are tired of troll post that make light of a terrible situation like this of manipulation on this kind of scale. While people like you call people free loaders for seeing through a scam WG is pulling off. 



Dirty_Camel #18 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 07:38

    Captain

  • Players
  • 48931 battles
  • 1,693
  • [F-3] F-3
  • Member since:
    11-29-2013
missions rigged like everything else in this game. I'm glad they rigged it for everyone to see, this way there is no denying it. Scorp posted it above clear as day. And now, that they are caught in a scam, it will be interesting to see them try to crawl out of it. My bet is they wont do anything being that we are the last 20k players that actually stuck around this long. I cant believe all the suckers that actually played in to this scam and bought tokens for rigged mission sets. Well done on that part WG!!! I would like to thank all you token buyers for paying for my 'free' T34B though..... well free to me :trollface: hats off to ya!

Edited by Dirty_Camel, Nov 21 2017 - 08:21.


Dirty_Camel #19 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 08:28

    Captain

  • Players
  • 48931 battles
  • 1,693
  • [F-3] F-3
  • Member since:
    11-29-2013

View PostScorpiany, on Nov 21 2017 - 07:00, said:

 

How? On the website, which players used to plan their mission grind, it clearly stated 30 battles played, in top 10 XP. Then in-game today, it changed to 30 wins. There is a HUGE difference between 30 battles and 30 wins. Even those with a decent amount of free time will find 30 wins practically impossible to do during the day.

 

 

Don't waste your time Scorp, most of this player base cant even bring a spoon to their mouth, little own understand the concept of a scam. Those who got duped, had it coming for thinking WG was actually giving away 'free' tanks. All WG did is sell a bunch of prem tanks at 1/2 price. In the end, the amount of free and purchased tanks will still have made WG a handful of cash that would have never been spent otherwise.

ColonelShakes #20 Posted Nov 21 2017 - 09:18

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5813 battles
  • 498
  • Member since:
    01-17-2016

View PostDirty_Camel, on Nov 21 2017 - 08:28, said:

 

Don't waste your time Scorp, most of this player base cant even bring a spoon to their mouth, little own understand the concept of a scam. Those who got duped, had it coming for thinking WG was actually giving away 'free' tanks. All WG did is sell a bunch of prem tanks at 1/2 price. In the end, the amount of free and purchased tanks will still have made WG a handful of cash that would have never been spent otherwise.

 

Never had to do day 19... only needed 15 ?  Spoon to mouth is for most , instinct. 

Simple addition , is , simple. 

 

Why can't you do it?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users