Jump to content


Operation Gambit- Bonds Situation

Operation Gambit Campaigns wot Bonds

  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

WhineMaker #21 Posted Dec 10 2017 - 03:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 32151 battles
  • 3,283
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View PostSilverEaglewing, on Dec 09 2017 - 17:06, said:

I defend those with relevant points. Also I'm glad your sorry but don't be I don't need it. Be sorry for yourself <3

 

I feel terrible I didn't waste any time on the current campaign, unlike you.

 

So sad for you... :D

 

 

 

 

Hilarious concept, having to defend a perma banned rager. :facepalm: 

 

Having only 10 battles, is as irrelevant as they come. :ohmy:



High_Caliber #22 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 07:35

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29161 battles
  • 478
  • [SYNG2] SYNG2
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 09 2017 - 18:42, said:

 

I found much better things to do than cry on the forums on why you can't get a reward tank... ;) Sorry your clan isn't good enough to earn enough bonds to receive a reward. :teethhappy:

 

Do you always defend the irrelevant alts? Or is it yours? Hmmmmm, could be... :great:

 

 

dude your opinion Is just that yours so why don't you just be quit badgering people and keep it to yourself

Edited by High_Caliber, Dec 11 2017 - 07:39.


SparkyGT #23 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 17:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 43575 battles
  • 3,972
  • [-NHL-] -NHL-
  • Member since:
    02-05-2012
And the worst thing about all this, if you dont have enough bonds it has a cutoff date, so your screwed if you cant get 4000. 

FartLord_invader #24 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 19:01

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 37379 battles
  • 30
  • [CHILE] CHILE
  • Member since:
    12-10-2014

We Should impeach WG and Choose another game to spend our money.

   

 

 

 



Devildog8 #25 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 20:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 9676 battles
  • 5,333
  • [XILES] XILES
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

I 100% agree with silver here, tho I dont own a lot of tier 10s I dont have the time to grind bonds and play in the Gambit as well, its either/or im in the top 3K now, but it will all be a waste if at the end I have to grind out 2K-3K bonds just to get what I earned in battle, yes silver is correct the real only players who have these are the ones in top clans, rightly so, but players have stayed up late and played these battles losing sleep for work and such to qualify for a tank, I really want the 907 but I feel im now going to be disappointed in the end to play hard to get no reward for my time, silver is correct if your in the top 3000, you should get the tank, no bonds required.

 

This is more of a tourney then a CW and if we win a tourney we get the prize, this should be no different 



High_Caliber #26 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 20:48

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29161 battles
  • 478
  • [SYNG2] SYNG2
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostHigh_Caliber, on Dec 11 2017 - 00:35, said:

 

dude your opinion Is just that yours so why don't you just be quit badgering people and keep it to yourself

Did my post shut him up? hope so


Edited by High_Caliber, Dec 11 2017 - 20:52.


Devildog8 #27 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 20:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 9676 battles
  • 5,333
  • [XILES] XILES
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

View PostHigh_Caliber, on Dec 11 2017 - 13:48, said:

I guess we finally shut this dude Clickez4Fun up thank God what a lamer

 

dont bet on it, he is a lifer troll

High_Caliber #28 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 20:53

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29161 battles
  • 478
  • [SYNG2] SYNG2
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostNotorious_Amarok, on Dec 09 2017 - 20:11, said:

how come where are not gettin any bonds in the tier 10 clan wars battles?

 

you have to earn them

Edited by High_Caliber, Dec 11 2017 - 20:54.


High_Caliber #29 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 20:59

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29161 battles
  • 478
  • [SYNG2] SYNG2
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostSilverEaglewing, on Dec 09 2017 - 16:46, said:

Hello guys, 

 

Current Situation with Ranked battles, and campaign reward tanks. 

We all know that Wargaming has made the top 3k players pay 4k bonds for a reward tank. A reward tank in the past that was, free for those who were able to dedicate enough to get to the top 3k position. 

Now why is wargaming doing this? Wargaming is making a reason for people to play ranked battles in the future. Ranked is a gamemode that is is suppose to rank you compared to the other players on the server. Sounds good doesn't it? However in reality its just a mode where you try to farm the most damage, and hopefully not lose a chevron, its either a steamroll, or a massive stalemate with no one wanting to push so they won't die for nothing. This doesn't show your skill, sure better players can swing the tide of battle, but it all comes down to luck in the end on how fast you manage to reach the top with good teams. Even someone with hours to spend on the game can reach the top for the scoreboard.  However that's beside the point, no one wanted to play this mode. It was so bad that no one wanted to play it so wargaming actually lowered the requirements to get to the top of the ranking. 

 

Bonds

Bonds were implemented with ranked battles, they can be used to unlock directives and enhanced equipment. Now they are needed to get the the reward tanks, even thought you placed on the top 3000 on server. Bonds are given for ranked battles, full tier 10 games , and grand battles. They are also given at the end of campaign. No bonds are given for individual battles. These bonds also can be paired with multipliers which are based on clans. 4k bonds are a lot and not all the players have the bonds for that. Mostly only top clans are able to get enough bonds due to the multipliers. I believe that if you are able to get a place in the top 3k, you should be able to get the tank for free. Its stupid, since it looks as if wargaming is trying to make it so that only the very top clans can get reward tanks. Or in other words they are trying to give out as little reward tanks as possible. So I believe wargaming should remove the 4k bonds for tanks, and just give them out. As the players already dedicated lots of times into getting tanks, and getting prevented to get a reward tank because you didn't want to play one of the worst modes, known as ranked. 


So please WG remove the buying reward tank system with bonds. 

Silver

 

check this out silver

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/563941-gm-frozen-dec-13-14-bonds-requirement-review/

 



WiDeLeC #30 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 22:11

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 20959 battles
  • 16
  • [PL1AD] PL1AD
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

View PostHigh_Caliber, on Dec 11 2017 - 19:59, said:

 

This is some good information High_Caliber , thank you for sharing. For those too lazy to click, the "Administrator" posted this:

 

The Global Map will be frozen from December 13, 0400 PT to December 15, 0400 PT.  i.e. no battles on December 13 and 14.

 

Also, we're looking into the concerns with bonds, and reviewing solutions.



Silver_ReBangBang_Wow #31 Posted Dec 11 2017 - 23:37

    Captain

  • Players
  • 33858 battles
  • 1,126
  • [NICO] NICO
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013
It seems that WG has listened to the community and is taking a look. Everyone keep working for it! :medal:

SparkyGT #32 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 02:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 43575 battles
  • 3,972
  • [-NHL-] -NHL-
  • Member since:
    02-05-2012
even if they debited our bonds, and we could build them back up over time, that would be good. just cant use directives for a while.

Gamisou #33 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 03:52

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14249 battles
  • 125
  • [GOONZ] GOONZ
  • Member since:
    10-27-2013

I think it's bull to make people spend bonds on an earned tank, unlike it always has been before. Let us use them to get the improved gear like all the Unicums have already. Getting hard to even compete with the them at the level they get those rewards by using diplo, etc... I could not play ranked as much due to Clanwars, clan would get pissed... now we need them, for a clan event reward? My only option is to bleed credits playing T10 now.

 

Please fix!


Edited by Gamisou, Dec 12 2017 - 03:57.


Devildog8 #34 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 18:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 9676 battles
  • 5,333
  • [XILES] XILES
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

View PostGamisou, on Dec 11 2017 - 20:52, said:

I think it's bull to make people spend bonds on an earned tank, unlike it always has been before. Let us use them to get the improved gear like all the Unicums have already. Getting hard to even compete with the them at the level they get those rewards by using diplo, etc... I could not play ranked as much due to Clanwars, clan would get pissed... now we need them, for a clan event reward? My only option is to bleed credits playing T10 now.

 

Please fix!

 

your playing right into their hands mate, wait to see what changes after the 2 day break

txtaxman #35 Posted Dec 13 2017 - 07:57

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 43322 battles
  • 165
  • [ARKAM] ARKAM
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011
And just when you think you're in the top 3000 comfortably, licenses drop and kick you out. True story.
:child: 

MisterIndian #36 Posted Dec 13 2017 - 12:43

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 58034 battles
  • 271
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011
Lol. You can easily earn 300 bonds a day from primarily playing tier 10 tanks. And with the multipliers wargaming have set up for how well the clan does, for this campaign nearly 40 of my members in my clan will have enough bonds and be ranked within the top 3000 for a shiny new tank. Again. I don't see the issue. I have never played ranked battles myself and will have more than enough for a tank. Possibly even a 1,000 bonds over what I need.

WhineMaker #37 Posted Dec 14 2017 - 08:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 32151 battles
  • 3,283
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View PostHigh_Caliber, on Dec 11 2017 - 11:48, said:

Did my post shut him up? hope so

 

Good luck with that. 

 

Must suck being a nico clone without a chance to get a reward tank. Sure hope you didn't put too many hours into your lost cause. :ohmy:

 

 

View PostDevildog8, on Dec 11 2017 - 11:49, said:

 

dont bet on it, he is a lifer troll
 

 

Another lost cause that has to have a handout from WG. :(



Swifty__ #38 Posted Dec 14 2017 - 22:34

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 13359 battles
  • 116
  • [200IQ] 200IQ
  • Member since:
    01-14-2014
I agree with this. I got lucky and had 4K bonds before starting the campaign just from playing tier 10 pubs. I heard rumors of reward tanks costing bonds so I never dared spend them until I found out for sure. I am very glad I did. Not everyone has time to play 20-30 pub games a day. Also most people can't suffer through it. I think people work hard enough just to get to the top 3k in ranking. That should be enough. I hope wg isn't doing this to try to force people to play ranked. If a ranked season starts right after the campaign I think the answer is obvious. I think the right this for WG to do is let people have bonds for equipment and directives. Leave the tank for free, people worked hard enough for it

Hellsfog #39 Posted Dec 14 2017 - 23:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 32029 battles
  • 4,501
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostMisterIndian, on Dec 13 2017 - 06:43, said:

Lol. You can easily earn 300 bonds a day from primarily playing tier 10 tanks. And with the multipliers wargaming have set up for how well the clan does, for this campaign nearly 40 of my members in my clan will have enough bonds and be ranked within the top 3000 for a shiny new tank. Again. I don't see the issue. I have never played ranked battles myself and will have more than enough for a tank. Possibly even a 1,000 bonds over what I need.

 

I'm sorry if I appear to be disputatious, but this is simply missing the point. If you have an all tier 10 game, do well and win, you  would get about 15 bonds. So your 300 bonds would take you about 3 hours to complete assuming 10 min per battle. You need tier 10 games which you may only get 2/3rd of the time so now you are up to 26 battles and 4.3 hours. So may only do well and win 50.31% of the time but your toon mates can carry you to 55% so now you are up to about 39 battles or 6.5 hours. Now you can do that for the 8 days it will take a top 25% player in a top 25 clan to grind out 2500 bonds he'll need to make up the difference. I wouldn't call anything that take that much time easy. 

 

So basically, your test of ability has morphed into a test of how much grinding anyone can tolerate and the only difference between you, me and some [edited]ter is that it takes the [edited]ter longer to grind the bonds. 

 

 



LpBronco #40 Posted Dec 15 2017 - 00:48

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 38113 battles
  • 2,200
  • [TG] TG
  • Member since:
    11-19-2010

He's talking like we all average 4.5k damage a game and see max bonds 73% of the time. 

 

...but back to missing the point...

 

It's ridiculous that I would have to use over 2,000 bonds I earned from ranked battles to supplement my "quest" for a reward tank  and then still fall short and have to earn about another 1000 in the next month.

 

This isn't convincing me that CW is worth the effort or expense as I've had to augment credits as there isn't time for 4 hours of CW and then credit grinding on top of that.







Also tagged with Operation Gambit, Campaigns, wot, Bonds

3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users