Jump to content


GM Frozen Dec 13-14 + Bonds Requirement Review unlocked

wargamingshanagins

  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

Ace_Ion #1 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 03:53

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

The Global Map will be frozen from December 13, 0400 PT to December 15, 0400 PT.  i.e. no battles on December 13 and 14.

 

Also, we're looking into the concerns with bonds, and reviewing solutions.

 

 

welp, its happening again lolz. Whatever you guys were playing for, the rules will change again. lets lock the thread so no one can talk about it. We are over halfway through the campaign and now we are going to change some things. good grief man. Stop killing your own game!!!!!


Edited by Ace_Ion, Dec 12 2017 - 03:55.


Ace_Ion #2 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 03:56

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
These campaigns get more twisted and manipulated every time. Can we just set some rules before the start of the campaign and roll with it? maybe learn from our mistakes and make changes for the next time?

Hellsfog #3 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 03:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 31767 battles
  • 4,261
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011
There are two or three threads discussing the issue. Now 4. 

Ace_Ion #4 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 03:58

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
would of been too easy for WG not to lock the thread, but they are trying not to hear it

Orion3 #5 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 10456 battles
  • 2,795
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013
Downtime is for the patch right? Not sure about the bonds though.

Hellsfog #6 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 31767 battles
  • 4,261
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011
I thought the patch was 13th and 14th. 

nxp #7 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:19

    Captain

  • Players
  • 36339 battles
  • 1,128
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013
i like the bonds system. now my special tanks ( 907, t95E"what ever", 121b, and soon VK7201) is extra special.

Ace_Ion #8 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:24

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
i dont even care about the bonds thing, its the fact that whenever we have an event it is completely different by the end. usually drastically

xrays_ #9 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 44653 battles
  • 3,006
  • [FELOW] FELOW
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

View PostAce_Ion, on Dec 11 2017 - 22:24, said:

i dont even care about the bonds thing, its the fact that whenever we have an event it is completely different by the end. usually drastically

 

You haven't a clue what WarGaming is going to do, if they even do anything, yet you have already concluded that it is bad. Granted, while WG does a lot of stupid things, what I gleaned from the released statement was that they were investigating the low percentage of possible players that could earn enough Bonds to exchange for a prize tank at the end of the Campaign. Of course, it could be something completely crazy, but I'd rather wait to see instead of running around claiming the sky is falling the day of a new moon.

 

x.



trondd #10 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:39

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17707 battles
  • 216
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014
Why the hell are you complaining? Lets hypothetically assume they change it to top 3000 gets to choose tank instead of bonds. That would work out very nicely for most clans who will not get enough bonds to buy a tank

Ace_Ion #11 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:40

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View Postxrays_, on Dec 12 2017 - 04:36, said:

 

You haven't a clue what WarGaming is going to do, if they even do anything, yet you have already concluded that it is bad. Granted, while WG does a lot of stupid things, what I gleaned from the released statement was that they were investigating the low percentage of possible players that could earn enough Bonds to exchange for a prize tank at the end of the Campaign. Of course, it could be something completely crazy, but I'd rather wait to see instead of running around claiming the sky is falling the day of a new moon.

 

x.

 

"Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it." A lot more ppl will be surprised if its a good change vs. getting screwed again.

Ace_Ion #12 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:43

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View Posttrondd, on Dec 12 2017 - 04:39, said:

Why the hell are you complaining? Lets hypothetically assume they change it to top 3000 gets to choose tank instead of bonds. That would work out very nicely for most clans who will not get enough bonds to buy a tank

 

Because we are a week out and the rules are changing. Simple enough for you? i played the last campaign to get rammed in the pooper by guys playing 15 battles taking my tank when i was ranked 2000. So this time people choose not to go through the garbage of a campaign only to get informed 10 days in that its changing. Dangle that dollar, shoulda been quicker!

Ace_Ion #13 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:44

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
All im saying is make the rules, launch the campaign, finish the campaign. 

thandiflight #14 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 04:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 73367 battles
  • 3,973
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    07-10-2011
T95E6 and 121B vie with each other to be worst tier X in the game.....much desirable...

xrays_ #15 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 05:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 44653 battles
  • 3,006
  • [FELOW] FELOW
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

View PostAce_Ion, on Dec 11 2017 - 22:44, said:

All im saying is make the rules, launch the campaign, finish the campaign. 

 

So, what you're saying is, you like the rules that appear to only award maybe 3-400 players on the NA server with the ability to exchange their winning Bonds for a tank? Because, from all the numbers being talked about with this Campaign, that's what I've been hearing. WarGaming appears to be discussing options to remedy that oversight due to lower populations on this server, but apparently even thinking about fixing it is out of the question for people like you.

 

x.



Ace_Ion #16 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 05:14

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View Postxrays_, on Dec 12 2017 - 05:06, said:

 

So, what you're saying is, you like the rules that appear to only award maybe 3-400 players on the NA server with the ability to exchange their winning Bonds for a tank? Because, from all the numbers being talked about with this Campaign, that's what I've been hearing. WarGaming appears to be discussing options to remedy that oversight due to lower populations on this server, but apparently even thinking about fixing it is out of the question for people like you.

 

x.

 

Yep, thats what im saying. If it takes a fail like this for them to actually think something out before launching it then so be it.  But you shouldnt change the criteria just days before the end.

StainlessRat #17 Posted Dec 12 2017 - 18:33

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 31187 battles
  • 28
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    07-18-2013

View PostAce_Ion, on Dec 11 2017 - 23:14, said:

 

Yep, thats what im saying. If it takes a fail like this for them to actually think something out before launching it then so be it.  But you shouldnt change the criteria just days before the end.

 

 

I agree. The rules should not be changed once it starts. However WG has a history of ninja editing the rules on previous events. 

 

Invest some time during content development to get it right. Don’t scramble during the event to fix it 



Ace_Ion #18 Posted Dec 13 2017 - 22:20

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View PostStainlessRat, on Dec 12 2017 - 18:33, said:

 

 

I agree. The rules should not be changed once it starts. However WG has a history of ninja editing the rules on previous events. 

 

Invest some time during content development to get it right. Don’t scramble during the event to fix it 

 

This is the same reason i have guys that refuse to participate, because after spending weeks of grinding WG will change the rules.



Ace_Ion #19 Posted Dec 13 2017 - 22:22

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18350 battles
  • 69
  • [_F_] _F_
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
i feel like if you make the top 3k players you should be rewarded the 3k bonds to get the tank. If you happen to excel to top 1k or what not, then they get more bonds for improved equipment or ect. But now im hearing with the multipliers there are guys that are barely even playing in line for tanks. why does it have to be this difficult?

Swifty__ #20 Posted Dec 14 2017 - 19:48

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 12424 battles
  • 116
  • [-HAZ-] -HAZ-
  • Member since:
    01-14-2014
The issue is that if you are top 3k but your clan doesn't have a good bond multiplayer you are screwed. That's why they are changing it. This campaign did not play out the way anyone thought it would. I am assuming that at the start WG though that the only people that would get top 3k are the the people in the top clans with the best multiplayers. That is just not true. If you look at any clan that has been active throughout the campaign they have at least 1 person in running for a tank. Obviously with some exceptions. Any clan Green and above can get tanks if they are active enough. There clan won't rank top 20 so they won't get the required bonds. It needs to be changed, let's hope they do the correct thing




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users