Jump to content


SPECIAL PRICE


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

ats1080 #1 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 21:31

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

YEW GUIES!!!  LEWK!!!  FOR THE SPECIAL PRICE OF JUST 4 THOUSAND BONDS YOU CAN HAVE A TIER 10 TANK!!!

 

 

THANKS FOR SHOVING THAT 4K FOOT LONG [edited]IN JUST A LITTLE DEEPER WG!!!

 



WhineMaker #2 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 21:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 31424 battles
  • 2,585
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

The entitlement is STRONG in this thread. :confused:

 

It was posted by WG before the campaign that the tank would cost 4k bonds. Now it's a shock to you?

 

 

Better get to grinding. There's no way to make enough bonds by whining on the forums. :angry:

 

 

 

 

 

You know, for another 100 bonds, WG will apply lube. And for another 1000 bonds, they can also be ribbed for your pleasure. :B



ats1080 #3 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 21:57

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 22 2017 - 15:47, said:

The entitlement is STRONG in this thread. :confused:

 

It was posted by WG before the campaign that the tank would cost 4k bonds. Now it's a shock to you?

 

 

Better get to grinding. There's no way to make enough bonds by whining on the forums. :angry:

 

 

 

 

 

You know, for another 100 bonds, WG will apply lube. And for another 1000 bonds, they can also be ribbed for your pleasure. :B

 

I'm not seeing any entitlement anywhere, where is it? 

 

WG knows they [edited] us hard with the bonds and then has the nerves to say 4000 bonds is a "Special price".



GeorgePreddy #4 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 22:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 14334 battles
  • 6,988
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

4000 bonds seems like a very special price to me.

 

Don't know what you're on about...

 



shinglefoot #5 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 22:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 21739 battles
  • 2,560
  • [LONER] LONER
  • Member since:
    02-07-2013

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 22 2017 - 16:47, said:

The entitlement is STRONG in this thread. :confused:

 

It was posted by WG before the campaign that the tank would cost 4k bonds. Now it's a shock to you?

 

 

Better get to grinding. There's no way to make enough bonds by whining on the forums. :angry:

 

 

 

 

 

You know, for another 100 bonds, WG will apply lube. And for another 1000 bonds, they can also be ribbed for your pleasure. :B

 

​     I'm fairly certain these people worked their asses off to EARN their tanks. Wargaming's so far out of touch it's pathetic and if I were in their shoes I'd be super pissed.

WhineMaker #6 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 22:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 31424 battles
  • 2,585
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Postshinglefoot, on Dec 22 2017 - 13:17, said:

 

​     I'm fairly certain these people worked their asses off to EARN their tanks. Wargaming's so far out of touch it's pathetic and if I were in their shoes I'd be super pissed.

 

Having to be in the top 44.7% of the participants is not working hard.

 

Implying anyone actually worked for a pixel reward tank...HAHAHAHAHAHA :D

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone knew from the beginning what the requirements were to receive the reward tank. Now they act like it's a surprise. :facepalm:

 

Blame the previous campaigns where players logged in for 5 battles and "earned" a reward tank. WG had to make changes. If you don't like the changes, no one is forcing you to participate. Simple enough.

 

But we all know, how can you maintain your Whine8 without whining and crying on the forums. ;)



ats1080 #7 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 22:35

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 22 2017 - 16:32, said:

 

Having to be in the top 44.7% of the participants is not working hard.

 

Implying anyone actually worked for a pixel reward tank...HAHAHAHAHAHA :D

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone knew from the beginning what the requirements were to receive the reward tank. Now they act like it's a surprise. :facepalm:

 

Blame the previous campaigns where players logged in for 5 battles and "earned" a reward tank. WG had to make changes, don't like the changes, no one is forcing you to participate. Simple enough.

 

But we all know, how can you maintain your Whine8 without whining and crying on the forums. ;)

 

If you were here for previous campaigns you would know that there was basically no one participating because of the bonds.  Which is exactly why "44.7%" of the players got the tank.

Edited by ats1080, Dec 22 2017 - 22:36.


shinglefoot #8 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 23:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 21739 battles
  • 2,560
  • [LONER] LONER
  • Member since:
    02-07-2013

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 22 2017 - 17:32, said:

 

Having to be in the top 44.7% of the participants is not working hard.

 

Implying anyone actually worked for a pixel reward tank...HAHAHAHAHAHA :D

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone knew from the beginning what the requirements were to receive the reward tank. Now they act like it's a surprise. :facepalm:

 

Blame the previous campaigns where players logged in for 5 battles and "earned" a reward tank. WG had to make changes. If you don't like the changes, no one is forcing you to participate. Simple enough.

 

But we all know, how can you maintain your Whine8 without whining and crying on the forums. ;)

 

​     You're one salty MFer...I bet you're fun at parties as well.

 

You're entitled to your opinion but I think it's bogus. 

 

Happy Holidays

 



WhineMaker #9 Posted Dec 22 2017 - 23:37

    Major

  • Players
  • 31424 battles
  • 2,585
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Postats1080, on Dec 22 2017 - 13:35, said:

 

If you were here for previous campaigns you would know that there was basically no one participating because of the bonds.  Which is exactly why "44.7%" of the players got the tank.

 

In the next campaign, I'm sure WG will adjust the number of rewards to a much lower number. 

ats1080 #10 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 01:36

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 22 2017 - 17:37, said:

 

In the next campaign, I'm sure WG will adjust the number of rewards to a much lower number. 

 

Why are you still here?



WhineMaker #11 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 02:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 31424 battles
  • 2,585
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Postats1080, on Dec 22 2017 - 16:36, said:

 

Why are you still here?

 

Are you still whining over something you knew ahead of time?

 

I can ask Santa if he'll bring you some cheese, to go with your abundance of whine, if you'd like. ;)

 

 

Did your Mom and Dad finally give in, when you stomped your feet or screamed long enough?



ats1080 #12 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 16:19

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostClickez4Fun, on Dec 22 2017 - 20:29, said:

 

Are you still whining over something you knew ahead of time?

 

I can ask Santa if he'll bring you some cheese, to go with your abundance of whine, if you'd like. ;)

 

 

Did your Mom and Dad finally give in, when you stomped your feet or screamed long enough?

 

You should change your name to StrawMan

FartLord_invader #13 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 17:57

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 35727 battles
  • 27
  • [CHILE] CHILE
  • Member since:
    12-10-2014

My only problem with the bond situation is:

the short  time-frame in which one would need to grind them. Perhaps, WG could open another ranked battles season soon. Or, extended the grace period.



trondd #14 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 18:18

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17707 battles
  • 216
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostFartLord_invader, on Dec 23 2017 - 17:57, said:

My only problem with the bond situation is:

the short  time-frame in which one would need to grind them. Perhaps, WG could open another ranked battles season soon. Or, extended the grace period.

 

They did extend it

Savage__Apples #15 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 18:21

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35391 battles
  • 894
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

Another baddie that is not in a clan making comments on an event they did not even participate in. He probably does not even know that WG was not going to give out a reward tank  but decided to last minute and then added the bonds purchase requirement on top of it.  So far WG has managed to kill off clan wars and now has killed off campaigns. Ranked battles are a joke just like every other game mode they have tried. Grand battles were a step in the right direction but the maps are garbage. Pretty sure WGs main goal is to kill off the NA server since it continues to shrink.  I have participated in my last campaign.  

 

 



Savage__Apples #16 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 18:22

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35391 battles
  • 894
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View Posttrondd, on Dec 23 2017 - 09:18, said:

 

They did extend it

 

15 day extension. Yippeeee

trondd #17 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 18:37

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17707 battles
  • 216
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostSavage__Apples, on Dec 23 2017 - 18:22, said:

 

15 day extension. Yippeeee

 

He asked for an extension. 15 days is an extension

 



ats1080 #18 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 19:11

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View Posttrondd, on Dec 23 2017 - 12:37, said:

 

He asked for an extension. 15 days is an extension

 

 

SOMEONE WITH 4K BONDS SPOTTED

FeelMy_APCR #19 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 19:34

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30308 battles
  • 868
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012
stop crying it’s so annoying i worked hard to get my stats up to join a top clan, then i worked hard to be noticed and get put into battles. i got 3k bonds from the campaign because of my HARD WORK now stop crying and go grind your stupid bonds ffs

ats1080 #20 Posted Dec 23 2017 - 21:30

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 32911 battles
  • 314
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostFeelMy_APCR, on Dec 23 2017 - 13:34, said:

stop crying it’s so annoying i worked hard to get my stats up to join a top clan, then i worked hard to be noticed and get put into battles. i got 3k bonds from the campaign because of my HARD WORK now stop crying and go grind your stupid bonds ffs

 

There is literally no crying other than your own here...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users