Jump to content


GET RID OF XVM

XVM

  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

HOTA_CHATON #41 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 12650 battles
  • 13,663
  • [GOLB] GOLB
  • Member since:
    09-28-2011

View PostRatFink_, on Dec 27 2017 - 14:18, said:

The object is to learn to play better not dumb down everyone else to your level. Op must be a Millennial.

 

He's probably human and doesn't speak robot like you seem to do.  That's all the xvm  teaches you: How to be dumb.

Backfire_ #42 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 28196 battles
  • 2,005
  • [X-OUT] X-OUT
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View PostHOTA_CHATON, on Dec 27 2017 - 16:21, said:

 

​Yes, I concur, get rid of XVM.  Get rid of XVM, people need to learn how to think for themselves.  xvm doesn't allow for thinking, you simply accept what it says, no matter what it says.  Wrong I don't need any stinking program to control my life just like this plague called xvm does the vast majority of players.

 

While I'm for XVM/in-battle game stats going away, I'm pretty sure you are confusing XVM with Skynet or perhaps the matrix...

Zogbert #43 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:36

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28566 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013
I use xvm and if I happen to be in Arty (I know two strikes already) I will use it to focus fire on the better players.  I want to win and if that helps me, so be it.  I will never get to that Unicom level but at least I try to help the team the best way I can.

Termitey #44 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:38

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 90643 battles
  • 683
  • [GOD_Z] GOD_Z
  • Member since:
    06-29-2012
and there lies the problem focaus fire on good players because of a cheet ingame mod

Backfire_ #45 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:43

    Major

  • Players
  • 28196 battles
  • 2,005
  • [X-OUT] X-OUT
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View PostZogbert, on Dec 27 2017 - 16:36, said:

I use xvm and if I happen to be in Arty (I know two strikes already) I will use it to focus fire on the better players.  I want to win and if that helps me, so be it.  I will never get to that Unicom level but at least I try to help the team the best way I can.

 

^Promoting dynamic game play!  What a guy.  I just finished arty missions and have a better winrate just focusing out priority targets without using XVM at all.  If you're going to play the 'special game mode tanks' at least play them well and direct your fire where its most meaningful at any given point.  Might try that instead of fixating on a blue or purple player and going 'arrrrgggg click click click derpy derp derp'. 

Jas0n74 #46 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:53

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 4441 battles
  • 20
  • [GNZX3] GNZX3
  • Member since:
    07-14-2013

View PostTermitey, on Dec 27 2017 - 22:38, said:

and there lies the problem focaus fire on good players because of a cheet ingame mod

 

​Tell me exactly how it is an "ingame cheet(CHEAT)"??? 

 



PALEJEDI #47 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 22:58

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 29933 battles
  • 69
  • [MECHS] MECHS
  • Member since:
    01-02-2017

View PostEisenriese, on Dec 27 2017 - 21:06, said:

XVM is fine outside of the game. I check my stats at least once a week just to see how I am playing and to check which tanks I am playing well in. In-game, the mod needs to be removed and added to the ban list. It's toxic and not needed. I also get tired of the craptastic players that chose to spout off "We Lose xx%. GG" then proceed to suicide or just afk. Its tiresome and just makes the game worse. 

 

nobody knows what win or lose xx% now because that feature has be disabled for months now...nothing wrong with xvm being in game, a lot of the player panels i

use is based on xvm..

 

 



Wolfdingo #48 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 23:54

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 97889 battles
  • 56
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012

View PostZogbert, on Dec 27 2017 - 16:36, said:

I use xvm and if I happen to be in Arty (I know two strikes already) I will use it to focus fire on the better players.  I want to win and if that helps me, so be it.  I will never get to that Unicom level but at least I try to help the team the best way I can.

 

​That's the reason they need to get rid of XVM. While your focusing an a good player. Many other better bigger target could of been taking out.

Wolfdingo #49 Posted Dec 27 2017 - 23:57

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 97889 battles
  • 56
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012

View PostPALEJEDI, on Dec 27 2017 - 16:58, said:

 

nobody knows what win or lose xx% now because that feature has be disabled for months now...nothing wrong with xvm being in game, a lot of the player panels i

use is based on xvm..

 

 

 

​Yeah tell yourself that next time you spawn into a game with 14 red player. I have played long enough to know I got a crapteam just by looking at clan labels.

 



Zogbert #50 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 00:00

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28566 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

View PostVanatee, on Dec 27 2017 - 21:43, said:

 

^Promoting dynamic game play!  What a guy.  I just finished arty missions and have a better winrate just focusing out priority targets without using XVM at all.  If you're going to play the 'special game mode tanks' at least play them well and direct your fire where its most meaningful at any given point.  Might try that instead of fixating on a blue or purple player and going 'arrrrgggg click click click derpy derp derp'. 

 

I believe I said focus not fixate.  Usually I see the better players out front.  If there is a choice between hitting a blue or red, I will take the blue.  And before you ask, yes I will take the red if it will remove the gun.  XVM is a tool not a a complete decision maker.



Wolfdingo #51 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 00:23

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 97889 battles
  • 56
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012

View PostZogbert, on Dec 27 2017 - 18:00, said:

 

I believe I said focus not fixate.  Usually I see the better players out front.  If there is a choice between hitting a blue or red, I will take the blue.  And before you ask, yes I will take the red if it will remove the gun.  XVM is a tool not a a complete decision maker.

 

​Good just by you saying that your willing to run without it then. Who are you kidding??? I bet every time you got a bad team you set up in the most in-appropriate place just to get the most damage before you die. I have run without XVM for a year and a half now. I think I've become a much better player because of it.



Zogbert #52 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 00:34

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28566 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

View PostWolfdingo, on Dec 27 2017 - 23:23, said:

 

​Good just by you saying that your willing to run without it then. Who are you kidding??? I bet every time you got a bad team you set up in the most in-appropriate place just to get the most damage before you die. I have run without XVM for a year and a half now. I think I've become a much better player because of it.

 

Sorry, you just lost your bet.  But please tell me more about how I play this game.

Wolfdingo #53 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 00:55

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 97889 battles
  • 56
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012

View PostZogbert, on Dec 27 2017 - 18:34, said:

 

Sorry, you just lost your bet.  But please tell me more about how I play this game.

 

​Maybe, but it kind of odd your top 11 tanks played are some of the best in the game.

scharnhorst310 #54 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 01:02

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 24444 battles
  • 5,873
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011

View PostWolfdingo, on Dec 27 2017 - 14:54, said:

 

​That's the reason they need to get rid of XVM. While your focusing an a good player. Many other better bigger target could of been taking out.

 

Most dangerous opponent in any match is a capable tanker. Tanks are just big dumb slow vehicles; in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing they become a big problem. 

Wolfdingo #55 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 01:14

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 97889 battles
  • 56
  • [L13TH] L13TH
  • Member since:
    09-13-2012

View Postscharnhorst310, on Dec 27 2017 - 19:02, said:

 

Most dangerous opponent in any match is a capable tanker. Tanks are just big dumb slow vehicles; in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing they become a big problem. 

Even good player can't carry if all those big dumb slow vehicles are out of action. 



scharnhorst310 #56 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 01:18

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 24444 battles
  • 5,873
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011

View PostWolfdingo, on Dec 27 2017 - 16:14, said:

Even good player can't carry if all those big dumb slow vehicles are out of action. 

 

True, but the more time you leave me to my work, the greater the odds are you'll find all the big dumb slow vehicles on your team out of action before mine will be. Thats what it is all about. To win I've got to smash as many of the enemy as quickly and efficiently as I can. I've got a long track record of completing that task quite well. I can't even begin to describe the countless battles I've watched where you can have 5 terribads left on one side; 1 or 2 good players on the other and they pull out wins. Hell I've got dozens and dozens of videos of my alone doing it. 

Edited by scharnhorst310, Dec 28 2017 - 01:21.


Silversound #57 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 04:21

    Major

  • Players
  • 38784 battles
  • 4,743
  • [-P-] -P-
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View PostDevildog8, on Dec 27 2017 - 12:40, said:

agreed I use to see hoards of t67s stat padding, now not so much

 

Those guys probably had pretty high win rates in them there T67's.

 

So at some point, they helped a lot more people win matches, than they hindered.

Just a thought.

 

*It's OK. Everyone already knows I'm an exposed #$%&^.

After five years, I play the tanks my friends are playing.



Gohibniu #58 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 07:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 72566 battles
  • 5,694
  • [T57] T57
  • Member since:
    11-17-2011

View Postxrays_, on Dec 27 2017 - 14:25, said:

 

Then they shouldn't be bothering you, should they?

 

Focus on your own gameplay and stop criticizing others for how they play. Own your actions!

 

x.

Nice ad homin attempt. Shaddup.



Gohibniu #59 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 07:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 72566 battles
  • 5,694
  • [T57] T57
  • Member since:
    11-17-2011

View PostGrouchy_Tomato, on Dec 27 2017 - 15:29, said:

 

War Gaming collects all the stats on you, wins , losses , hit ratios...........etc

XVM is just a tool that makes it covenant to display the stats in game

So if you want to whine about ppl being able to look at your stats.............[edited]to War Gaming. 

 

WG also counts the number of trees you have destroyed.....why?



Devildog8 #60 Posted Dec 28 2017 - 16:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 10365 battles
  • 6,297
  • [RSHRK] RSHRK
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

View PostWolfdingo, on Dec 27 2017 - 16:54, said:

 

​That's the reason they need to get rid of XVM. While your focusing an a good player. Many other better bigger target could of been taking out.

 

has nothing to do with XVM has to with a players target selection, XVM doesnt make a player play bad he and he alone controls his gameplay, saying XVM is the cause of that is just simply a cop out of not doing your job in battle to help the team win





Also tagged with XVM

3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users