Jump to content


WOT should change the price of the Reward Tanks.


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Sidekick2016 #1 Posted Jan 07 2018 - 00:39

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 17096 battles
  • 63
  • [FGTVE] FGTVE
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015
I think changing the price of the tanks and not having them all cost the same would make all tanks worth more personally as a reward because it would include the thought of applying economics to the collection. Example, OBJ 907 4000 bonds, 121B 3750 bonds, M60 3500 bonds, T95E6 3250 Bonds, VK 72.01 (K) 4250 bonds. I am close the price of the T95E6, and although it is not as good as some of the other tanks in game I would probably be super happy with it, and it would cause me to play it very often.

Edited by Sidekick2016, Jan 07 2018 - 00:43.


Kamahl1234 #2 Posted Jan 07 2018 - 00:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 18150 battles
  • 9,142
  • [ARSON] ARSON
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012
But does this mean prices should change if a tank is ever nerfed or otherwise changed? And what is the criteria for having different prices for same tier tanks? (especially tier 10's which are all worth the same historically)

Sidekick2016 #3 Posted Jan 07 2018 - 00:46

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 17096 battles
  • 63
  • [FGTVE] FGTVE
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015

View PostKamahl1234, on Jan 07 2018 - 00:42, said:

But does this mean prices should change if a tank is ever nerfed or otherwise changed? And what is the criteria for having different prices for same tier tanks? (especially tier 10's which are all worth the same historically)

 

No, cost in bonds should stay the same after any modification to the stats by WG, and prices in bonds are not the same as prices for credits. These tanks will always be reward tanks and the fact that they are the same price kind of washes the significant differences amongst them. Which in turn renders the individual value insignificant, everyone likes the OBJ 907 and the rest are only valued as a collectible to have as garage ornament.

Edited by Sidekick2016, Jan 07 2018 - 00:48.


T2Easy4ME #4 Posted Jan 07 2018 - 00:49

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 116 battles
  • 211
  • [7-TH] 7-TH
  • Member since:
    09-24-2017
No. Incredibly pointless, to be blunt. 

xrays_ #5 Posted Jan 07 2018 - 00:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 44653 battles
  • 3,006
  • [FELOW] FELOW
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

View PostT2Easy4ME, on Jan 06 2018 - 18:49, said:

No. Incredibly pointless, to be blunt. 

 

Oh, the irony.

 

x.



T2Easy4ME #6 Posted Jan 07 2018 - 01:09

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 116 battles
  • 211
  • [7-TH] 7-TH
  • Member since:
    09-24-2017

View Postxrays_, on Jan 07 2018 - 00:54, said:

 

Oh, the irony.

 

x.

OMG right? lol. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users