Jump to content


Disable a map


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

_Gungrave_ #21 Posted Jan 08 2018 - 21:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 38249 battles
  • 10,525
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postbunnycaulk, on Jan 08 2018 - 21:45, said:

 

in other words, you don't know either.   

 

No I understand why its a bad idea, I'm just tired of spelling it out for people who don't spend the time to think of the impact this would have.



apsen #22 Posted Jan 09 2018 - 15:48

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 120782 battles
  • 242
  • [FRI] FRI
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Post_Gungrave_, on Jan 08 2018 - 15:50, said:

 

No I understand why its a bad idea, I'm just tired of spelling it out for people who don't spend the time to think of the impact this would have.

 

So do not spell out again. Just post a link to previous one.

the_Deadly_Bulb #23 Posted Jan 09 2018 - 20:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 19165 battles
  • 2,371
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

View PostZanarkand_C, on Jan 08 2018 - 09:41, said:

I think it would be nice if WG would add a option in menu to deselect at least 1 map that a player would like to not see, 2 at most but at least 1 would be nice. Anyone else think this would make the game a bit more fun and if you could what map would you like to not play?

 

For me I would deselect Fiery Salient. I hate this map more then anything. Can't go hill without getting shot from mid, can't go mid without getting shot from hill. 1/2 line is a campers paradise. This map for me is the pits... the arm pits. I don't enjoy it no matter what class tank I pick.

 

Just say no to opting out.

Be it a class or map it matters not.

Simple really, play or don't.

 

 

Only one opt out is acceptable. Its called uninstall.



_Gungrave_ #24 Posted Jan 09 2018 - 22:12

    Major

  • Players
  • 38249 battles
  • 10,525
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postapsen, on Jan 09 2018 - 15:48, said:

 

So do not spell out again. Just post a link to previous one.

 

Sorry but I don't bookmark crap suggestions.

apsen #25 Posted Jan 10 2018 - 09:20

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 120782 battles
  • 242
  • [FRI] FRI
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Post_Gungrave_, on Jan 09 2018 - 16:12, said:

 

Sorry but I don't bookmark crap suggestions.

 

So why do you post them in the first place?

_Gungrave_ #26 Posted Jan 10 2018 - 11:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 38249 battles
  • 10,525
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postapsen, on Jan 10 2018 - 09:20, said:

 

So why do you post them in the first place?

 

Only real major suggestion I've made and supported was to bring back the Awful Panther that had a 3/4ths of people in support of and was implemented into the game. As of right now its still going through some final rounds of supertesting before they release it.

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/493305-success-bring-the-aufklaerungspanzer-panther-back-as-a-premium/

 

 

Worth mentioning thats the only major suggestion I've seen from the NA servers I know of that got sent up the chain to WG HQ in Belarus to be implemented.



apsen #27 Posted Jan 10 2018 - 14:33

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 120782 battles
  • 242
  • [FRI] FRI
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Post_Gungrave_, on Jan 10 2018 - 05:05, said:

 

Only real major suggestion I've made and supported was to bring back the Awful Panther that had a 3/4ths of people in support of and was implemented into the game. As of right now its still going through some final rounds of supertesting before they release it.

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/493305-success-bring-the-aufklaerungspanzer-panther-back-as-a-premium/

 

 

Worth mentioning thats the only major suggestion I've seen from the NA servers I know of that got sent up the chain to WG HQ in Belarus to be implemented.

 

 

You said you have already explained why excluding maps is a bad idea and you are not going to do it again. Where's that explanation?



_Gungrave_ #28 Posted Jan 10 2018 - 15:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 38249 battles
  • 10,525
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postapsen, on Jan 10 2018 - 14:33, said:

 

 

You said you have already explained why excluding maps is a bad idea and you are not going to do it again. Where's that explanation?

 

Just responding to how you phrased your last post.

 

View Postapsen, on Jan 10 2018 - 09:20, said:

 

So why do you post them in the first place?

 



apsen #29 Posted Jan 10 2018 - 15:12

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 120782 battles
  • 242
  • [FRI] FRI
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Post_Gungrave_, on Jan 10 2018 - 09:07, said:

 

Just responding to how you phrased your last post.

 

 

 

Ok, so you lost the conversation thread... Now could you point to your explanation of why the map exclusion is a bad idea

_Gungrave_ #30 Posted Jan 10 2018 - 15:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 38249 battles
  • 10,525
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postapsen, on Jan 10 2018 - 15:12, said:

 

Ok, so you lost the conversation thread... Now could you point to your explanation of why the map exclusion is a bad idea

 

I've said it numerous times for which you're wholly ignorant of accepting this fact that I'm not going to explain it. Regardless of my explanation as stated in my first post WG said years ago and has kept with this statement that they'll never add it.
 

Feel free to continue posting because at this point its amusing me.


Edited by _Gungrave_, Jan 10 2018 - 15:45.


Sgt__Guffy #31 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 01:39

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 2288 battles
  • 1,156
  • Member since:
    04-01-2017

Tick boxes to exclude any feature in a game is a bad idea. It is all part of the challenge to deal with things we don't like and the OP should accept it as such. If WG gave players a tick box to exclude maps then I want one to exclude Premium Tanks, use of gold ammunition and modifiers. Is that okay? :) 

 

Sounds very reasonable to me. ;)

 

Have fun, without tick boxes.

 

Guffy.



g327 #32 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 05:49

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 634 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    12-26-2017
Is there a way to vary the map selection/assignment? I get an overwhelming majority of games on mines, ruinsburg, and winter himmelsdorf. It’s really boring. I almost want to quit the battle immediately but I can’t do that to my teammates.

apsen #33 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 13:46

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 120782 battles
  • 242
  • [FRI] FRI
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Post_Gungrave_, on Jan 10 2018 - 09:45, said:

Feel free to continue posting because at this point its amusing me.

 

You've put so much effort in pretending to be able to argue it is a bad idea while you could have had one post referring your alleged previous post actually arguing the subject... Well at least I got you to admit to being a troll.



moogleslam #34 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 13:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 31287 battles
  • 3,172
  • [REL-A] REL-A
  • Member since:
    12-20-2013

View Postg327, on Jan 11 2018 - 00:49, said:

Is there a way to vary the map selection/assignment? I get an overwhelming majority of games on mines, ruinsburg, and winter himmelsdorf. It’s really boring. I almost want to quit the battle immediately but I can’t do that to my teammates.

 

Once you start playing higher Tiers, you'll see more variety, particularly at Tier 4 and up.

 

Not sure if this will paste very well, but this is the current rotation per Tier for all 42 maps:

 

Map Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Abbey       X X X X X X X
Airfield       X X X X X X X
Arctic Region       X X X X X X X
Cliff       X X X X X X X
El Halluf       X X X X X X X
Ensk   X X X X X X X X X
Erlenberg       X X X X X X X
Fiery Salient       X X X X X X X
Fisherman's Bay       X X X X X X X
Fjords       X X X X X X X
Highway       X X X X X X X
Himmelsdorf X X X X X X X X X X
Karelia   X X X X X X X X X
Kharkov       X X X X X X X
Klondike                   X
Lakeville       X X X X X X X
Live Oaks       X X X X X X X
Malinovka   X X X X X X X X X
Mines X X X X X X X X X X
Mittengard X X                
Mountain Pass       X X X X X X X
Murovanka       X X X X X X X
Nedelberg                   X
Overlord         X X X X X X
Paris           X X X X X
Pilsen         X X X X X X
Prokhorovka   X X X X X X X X X
Redshire       X X X X X X X
Ruinberg   X X X X X X X X X
Sacred Valley       X X X X X X X
Sand River       X X X X X X X
Serene Coast       X X X X X X X
Siegfried Line       X X X X X X X
Stalingrad           X X X X X
Steppes       X X X X X X X
Swamp       X X X X X X X
Tundra       X X X X X X X
Westfield       X X X X X X X
Widepark       X X X        
Windstorm       X X X X X X X
Winter Himmelsdorf X X X X X X X X X X
Winterberg       X X X X X X X

Edited by moogleslam, Jan 11 2018 - 15:43.


apsen #35 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 14:02

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 120782 battles
  • 242
  • [FRI] FRI
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostSgt__Guffy, on Jan 10 2018 - 19:39, said:

 I want one to exclude Premium Tanks, use of gold ammunition and modifiers. Is that okay? :) 

 

 

Go ahead you already could do that. Just don't load gold ammunition and never play premium tanks...

 

You have started your post with nice argument and then turn into this... Kind of devalues your original one...

 

PS I'm not really for this change. I'm just playing devil's advocate here. When you are arguing do try to use good argument. Geez, even 'I don't like' is better than some of the 'arguments' here...



g327 #36 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 15:07

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 634 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    12-26-2017
Thank you, Moogleslam.

g327 #37 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 15:08

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 634 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    12-26-2017
Thank you, Moogleslam.

Sgt__Guffy #38 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 18:23

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 2288 battles
  • 1,156
  • Member since:
    04-01-2017

View Postapsen, on Jan 11 2018 - 07:02, said:

 

Go ahead you already could do that. Just don't load gold ammunition and never play premium tanks...

 

You have started your post with nice argument and then turn into this... Kind of devalues your original one...

 

PS I'm not really for this change. I'm just playing devil's advocate here. When you are arguing do try to use good argument. Geez, even 'I don't like' is better than some of the 'arguments' here...

 

Take the comment with a pinch of salt. ;)

_Gungrave_ #39 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 19:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 38249 battles
  • 10,525
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postapsen, on Jan 11 2018 - 13:46, said:

 

You've put so much effort in pretending to be able to argue it is a bad idea while you could have had one post referring your alleged previous post actually arguing the subject... Well at least I got you to admit to being a troll.

 

Because there is no argument at all when the fact remains that WG's stance on the subject is a resounding no. I just found it amusing how you clearly ignored this golden tidbit of info while trying to repeatedly ask me why I think this suggestion is a bad idea despite me saying I don't want to.


Edited by _Gungrave_, Jan 11 2018 - 22:11.


the_Deadly_Bulb #40 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 20:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 19165 battles
  • 2,371
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014
+1 Moogleslam




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users