Jump to content


Replace the AMX 65 t with the AMX M4 mle. 49


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Poll: Best suggestion NA (16 members have cast votes)

They really should

  1. Yes (9 votes [56.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 56.25%

  2. No (7 votes [43.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 43.75%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

CynicalDutchie #1 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 14:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 37767 battles
  • 3,125
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011

So here are the facts:

 

The 65t is utter trash

The M4 mle. 49 is not.

 

I don't see why we can't have 1 tech tree variant and 1 premium variant especially considering the fact there are like 12 different Sherman variants in the game.



Crabybaby #2 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 14:45

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 21086 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    01-18-2014

Given that the M49 is a premium, there is no chance WG would make it a part of the tech tree, since they would need to pay a LOT of refunds.

 

However, there is still the option of the AMX M4 48, which could be tuned to be almost identical (stat-wise) to the M4 49.  It was actually tested roughly 4 years ago, along with many other tanks that never made it to the game, such as the Sturmtiger, Char 2C, and the FCM F1 (although those last two did appear in the Halloween event).

 

Of course they could always buff the armor of AMX 65T, since that is the only thing bringing it down.  Increasing the frontal hull to 135-150 millimeters would be good, as well as removing the weak spot below the gun on the top turret and strengthening the tumors on the top turret (They should still be weak spots, but they should be similar to those on the Foch, where only the center is weak).



CynicalDutchie #3 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 14:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 37767 battles
  • 3,125
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
They wouldn't need to pay any refunds. The current premium version stays as it is. I'm merely suggesting they clone it into the tech tree as a regular T8 and replacement for the 65t

Benjeeh_CA #4 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 15:25

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29122 battles
  • 541
  • [DBLTP] DBLTP
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012
The 65t would be decent if they buffed it's gun and either it's mobility or armor. Idk who thought slow and no armor was a good idea i really dislike this tank

_Gungrave_ #5 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 15:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 38233 battles
  • 10,483
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

They won't do it because the 65T acts as a free xp tank to make them money.

 

Also your suggestion makes way too much sense and so WG won't do it. Better option I think is if they put the tier 8 at tier 7 with the tumor turret and used your suggestion. Just for laughs they could even have the 65T link to the tier 7 TD since they're related because of the tumors.


Edited by _Gungrave_, Jan 11 2018 - 15:36.


Sir_Tomato_DroolsAlot #6 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 16:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 33072 battles
  • 2,835
  • Member since:
    10-09-2011
yep, because every grind should be too easy..

_Gungrave_ #7 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 18:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 38233 battles
  • 10,483
  • [JGRN] JGRN
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostSir_Tomato_DroolsAlot, on Jan 11 2018 - 16:20, said:

yep, because every grind should be too easy..

 

While this is true the AMX 65t is bad to the point where its masochistic to play it.

Bryukov #8 Posted Jan 11 2018 - 20:12

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40746 battles
  • 157
  • [GYB] GYB
  • Member since:
    03-18-2014

View Post_Gungrave_, on Jan 11 2018 - 12:15, said:

 

While this is true the AMX 65t is bad to the point where its masochistic to play it.

 

It is so awful that after making a solid effort to grind it, I just blew some free XP to move on...




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users