Jump to content


Update 9.22 - USSR Tree Revision


  • Please log in to reply
307 replies to this topic

Diacom #41 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:21

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29579 battles
  • 727
  • [MKGGT] MKGGT
  • Member since:
    12-04-2011

View PostQuemapueblos, on Jan 11 2018 - 12:20, said:

Take a break from the festive Holiday Ops. hustle to get up to speed on the changes coming to USSR vehicles! Update 9.22 will take on the nation’s least-played tanks, revitalizing them through an injection of new vehicles, structural re-shuffles, and several comebacks.

Read the full article here

 

 

So why is it the Brit line was able to keep the TD that was replaced if it was researched and purchased, but not so for the SU-122-54? Or, better yet, give it the T10 treatment, branch it off the ISU-152 and leave it at tier 9, then add a new tier 10 that fits behind the 122-54.

 

And for the love of all that is holy, clean up the tree, it's starting to grow thorns the way it looks when it should be more linear in the way it looks.  Right now it appears to be more of a circus dart board than something that should be displayed in a game as a finished product.


Edited by Diacom, Jan 12 2018 - 04:27.


LeeJDM #42 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:27

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 42439 battles
  • 68
  • [SOYUZ] SOYUZ
  • Member since:
    05-10-2014
what will happen if we have tier IX and X in garage? If we have the tier X, they will give a tier IX for free, so if we have IX and X ? They will give us credits?

How manny XP needs to grind IS-M anybody knows? Want to start grind him.

Or

I have 430 unlocked if i buy him, i get something special  for buy it before the update?

Edited by LeeJDM, Jan 12 2018 - 04:31.


EmperorJuliusCaesar #43 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 24953 battles
  • 3,155
  • [EOR] EOR
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View Postmoogleslam, on Jan 11 2018 - 11:38, said:

View Postpanzer716, on Jan 11 2018 - 15:34, said:

I'm kind of upset the SU-122-54 is being removed entirely... I like that tank... Could special vehicle status work here or am I the only one that feel this way..?

 

It could and it should, but it doesn't seem that will be the case.

 

Special status is reserved for tier 10s as much of the work/grind of a line is going from 9-10, and that's a good thing.



Dustin467 #44 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:34

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10172 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    08-13-2012

I really want to know for sure if we get to keep the SU-122-54 as a special tank or not, because I'm grinding for it madly right now so that I can get it before they remove it, and I was going to use the holiday ops discount on it, but I don't know if I will keep it or not so I really want to know if I should keep grinding it and apply the discount to it or not.



EmperorJuliusCaesar #45 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 24953 battles
  • 3,155
  • [EOR] EOR
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostDiacom, on Jan 11 2018 - 19:21, said:

View PostQuemapueblos, on Jan 11 2018 - 12:20, said:

Take a break from the festive Holiday Ops. hustle to get up to speed on the changes coming to USSR vehicles! Update 9.22 will take on the nation’s least-played tanks, revitalizing them through an injection of new vehicles, structural re-shuffles, and several comebacks.

Read the full article here

 

 

So why is it the Brit line was able to keep the TD that was replaced if it was researched and purchased, but not so for the SU-122-54? Or, better yet, give it the T10 treatment, branch it off the ISU-152 and leave it at tier 9, then add a new tier 10 that fits behind the 122-54.

 

And for the love of all that is holy, clean up the tree, it's starting to grow thorns the way it looks when it should be more linear in the way it looks.  Right now it appears to be more of a circus dart board than something that should be displayed in a game as a finished product.

 

Because the Brit TD was a tier 10, much of the work of a line is in going from tier 9 to tier 10. 



mworthy #46 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:44

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10178 battles
  • 833
  • [941ST] 941ST
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011
ok i dont have the 263 \i never wanted it i wanted the Su-122-54 and i want to keep that tank is it really so hard to amke it branch off of another TD? or better yet make a new line for the soviets i mean you have tanks you could use, ASU-57, and the ASU-85 are a couple that aren't in the game and could be used for a line

Dragnix #47 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 04:53

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 9034 battles
  • 28
  • [WLSON] WLSON
  • Member since:
    02-11-2014

View PostQuemapueblos, on Jan 11 2018 - 14:20, said:

Take a break from the festive Holiday Ops. hustle to get up to speed on the changes coming to USSR vehicles! Update 9.22 will take on the nation’s least-played tanks, revitalizing them through an injection of new vehicles, structural re-shuffles, and several comebacks.

Read the full article here

 

 

What tanks gonna be for Tier X after T-10 and Obj Ver. II?

Wazoo117 #48 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 05:29

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 22731 battles
  • 534
  • Member since:
    03-05-2011

LEAVE THE 263 ALONE!!!!!!



Zuul #49 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 05:33

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 40062 battles
  • 111
  • Member since:
    09-29-2010

They don't seem to know what to do with the SU-122-54.

Personally I'd rather see it left in the tree, at tier. They can branch it within an existing tree (either tier IX point would do for me really,) similar to the Ferdinand/JagdPanther II arrangement.

Seems a better use of the model than scrapping it or regurgitating it as a blunted Premium that no one is satisfied with.

People who want to bypass it can do so with ease and those who would like to keep it or find it's nature to their liking can choose to work through it instead.



Day_of_the_dead #50 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 05:59

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 21986 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013
No, no, no, no, no, no leave the 263 alone. The main reason I researched the 263 is because of its unique playstyle the other TD lines, if anything it needs an aim time buff. I do not want another damn TD that deals '650' damage that's basically another TD with 750 damage. The people who grinded out the endless battles to go through the mediocre SU-100M1 and SU-101, to the awesome SU-122-54 to get this awesome and unique machine it was a product of determination to get this TD. The OBJ 268 MK. 4 is not needed, frankly it should never be suggested at all.

mworthy #51 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 06:03

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10178 battles
  • 833
  • [941ST] 941ST
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View PostZuul, on Jan 11 2018 - 23:33, said:

They don't seem to know what to do with the SU-122-54.

Personally I'd rather see it left in the tree, at tier. They can branch it within an existing tree (either tier IX point would do for me really,) similar to the Ferdinand/JagdPanther II arrangement.

Seems a better use of the model than scrapping it or regurgitating it as a blunted Premium that no one is satisfied with.

People who want to bypass it can do so with ease and those who would like to keep it or find it's nature to their liking can choose to work through it instead.

 

that or create another line i mean theres the ASU-57 and the ASU-85 the ASU-85 could be tier 7 or 8 that leads the 122-54 and that leads to a new tier 10

Zuul #52 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 06:10

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 40062 battles
  • 111
  • Member since:
    09-29-2010

View Postmworthy, on Jan 11 2018 - 22:03, said:

 

that or create another line i mean theres the ASU-57 and the ASU-85 the ASU-85 could be tier 7 or 8 that leads the 122-54 and that leads to a new tier 10

 

They branched the 430 II this way, if they had something on hand to do the same with the SU-122-54 I think it's likely we would already see it. I'd just like them to leave the tank alone if they don't have something concrete to improve it with and just give it an alternate route for those who don't want to have to play it.

Dands #53 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 06:44

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 11213 battles
  • 896
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010

View Postdominator_98, on Jan 12 2018 - 05:42, said:

 

My prediction based on what they have done previously is that you will keep the T10 and IS7 in your garage, and the 257 will be unlocked but not in your garage. Accumulated XP on the T10 will be transferred to the 257. Not sure if you will get the new tier 10 after the T10 for free or not.

 

Which is totally not what I'd like. I have enough XP to unlock the IS-7 but really I'm not that keen of ever unlocking and buying it. I have the IS-4. Same for the Object 268, my 704 has enough XP to unlock buy again, I hate the Tier X.

 

I'd like the T-10 moved and all the earned XP saved on that vehicle. I'll take my chances on what the new Tier X tank is after the T-10.


 



Gunadie #54 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 06:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 39535 battles
  • 4,353
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostQuemapueblos, on Jan 11 2018 - 11:20, said:

Take a break from the festive Holiday Ops. hustle to get up to speed on the changes coming to USSR vehicles! Update 9.22 will take on the nation’s least-played tanks, revitalizing them through an injection of new vehicles, structural re-shuffles, and several comebacks.

Read the full article here

 

 

When are you at WG going to realize that this is NOT what the players want!!!

 

We want the SU122-54 !

We want the OBJ263 to REMAIN AT TIER 10


Edited by Gunadie, Jan 12 2018 - 07:30.


Gunadie #55 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 07:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 39535 battles
  • 4,353
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

Another FAILED attempt at revising a tech tree that no one wants except you, War Shaming!

 

Why do you insist on shoving this turd OBJECT 268/4 down our throats?

This narrative of your back and forth between historical values and its a game is retarded!

Stop using it when it suits your interest and ignoring it when it does not.

The (crap) gun elevation angles are one of the biggest reasons this line is so poorly received!


 

 

THE PLAYER BASE IS NOT INTERESTED IN REMOVING THE OBJ263 FROM TIER 10 TO TIER 9

 

 

Do you really need to give us another reason to not spend our money on your game???



novarius #56 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 10:17

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 2423 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011
How long do we have until this rolls out? That's my big question. 

LeeJDM #57 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 11:47

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 42439 battles
  • 68
  • [SOYUZ] SOYUZ
  • Member since:
    05-10-2014
I don't want SU122-54  ..... i don't like him, for me they can replace, its the only tank i didn't do on this game, and i'm really happy with the changes...

edk_tpr #58 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 13:19

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 42108 battles
  • 533
  • [T-GBU] T-GBU
  • Member since:
    02-23-2011

Do what you want with the  su122-54, it's meh

Don't care how you 'fix' the a44 / 416 line, better yet; get rid if it.  it was not complex to play, it was simply garbage

 

Keep the obj263 as is       go farm for new money somewhere else



hebus412 #59 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 17:07

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22700 battles
  • 101
  • [NASH] NASH
  • Member since:
    06-19-2013

So... You are not making good on your promise to make the KV* line "Damage dealing fortresses they were intended to be"? Your words WG. Instead you ignore the KV line entirely? Again, more changes to the IS line... Hey here is something, why not fix the issues with IS-4?! Just removing the weak spot on the driver port alone would put it back to where it should be... which should NEVER have been added (stealth nerf long ago), the ST-I still uses the old armoring on the hull... making it better then the IS-4 currently. Why aren't you mentioning how low the IS-4 is played?

 

Then again, brit line was promised Chieftian for YEARS as a tier 10 heavy... what happens? Chieftian/T95 is added as a tier 8 clan reward only, then FV is finally changed out for... super conq.

 

Not to mention the magical IS-5 that was finally put into the game to complete the IS chain... again as a freaking clan reward.

 

Your company should start getting their stories straight between Divisions/Regions. Because one hand is promising one thing, and the other hand is doing something else, pissing off your player base.



Georgehaoren #60 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 18:01

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 5 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    01-04-2014

Why not make SU-122-54 a premium tank? Just like the T34 of the US. You already have T55A as a T9 premium tank...That's a HUGE business!

The person who made this stupid desition in the relative department of WG should be fired because he/she did not found the business inside this. You could have the chance selling the SU-122-54 in $400 and there must be a lot of people pay that amount of money buy it! Stupid!


Edited by Georgehaoren, Jan 12 2018 - 18:13.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users