Jump to content


Save the 263 and SU 122-54!


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

TrumpH8Nsnowflake #1 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 20:59

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 62879 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    03-06-2011
This is horrible decision by WG to scrap the Su 122-54 and dumb down the 263!.  The 263 is a uniquely fun TD to play.  By far my favorite TD.  WG......you really need to reconsider this change.  Why not leave the Su 122-54 and 263 exactly where they are and in the same configuration and make the 268v4 an alternate choice to the 263 in the same manner as the T62 and OBJ 140 are to the T54 in the Medium line?

power_Donky #2 Posted Jan 12 2018 - 21:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 24072 battles
  • 3,040
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    11-06-2013
Nobody even plays this line, they need to buff the su 100m1 and the su101. They should leave the 263 and 122-54 alone.

mworthy #3 Posted Jan 14 2018 - 03:09

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10264 battles
  • 860
  • [941ST] 941ST
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View Postpower_Donky, on Jan 12 2018 - 15:03, said:

Nobody even plays this line, they need to buff the su 100m1 and the su101. They should leave the 263 and 122-54 alone.

I'm fine with how they are they aren't bad tanks . That being said I wouldn't mind a buff but I read they are going to get even slower reloads for their guns



tanopasman62 #4 Posted Jan 14 2018 - 16:11

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 15964 battles
  • 2,918
  • Member since:
    12-13-2016
It's pretty obvious, they first nerfed the 268 line, now they're ruining the 263, it's a very scummy way to force some folks to play the made up knock off TD line instead.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users