Jump to content


9.22 release earlier than expected

9.22

  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

fred_632 #1 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:19

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 5993 battles
  • 179
  • Member since:
    09-15-2015

Saw on the RU Forum they said something about the 6th of Feb and TAP confirmed it :amazed: WG rushing before 1.0

 

https://thearmoredpa...2-release-date/

 



CapnNoahJoJo03 #2 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:39

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 15597 battles
  • 802
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    04-08-2016
Crap I still need 60k on is3. Ehh I can make it.

DeadArashi #3 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:43

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 20 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013
It's ridiculous that they're forcing it when there's issues with the Obj 257 and 705 model and people still want to keep tier 10 Obj 263

ClydeCooper421 #4 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:43

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 13403 battles
  • 2,763
  • [LOAF] LOAF
  • Member since:
    05-18-2015

holy crap i just got my 416 fully upgraded. No way i can get the 430 before then... dangit. 

 

 

I really think this is an unwise decision on WG's part. This patch should not be rushed. 



ToothDecay #5 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 26398 battles
  • 5,922
  • [NARC] NARC
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostDeadArashi, on Jan 24 2018 - 22:43, said:

It's ridiculous that they're forcing it when there's issues with the Obj 257 and 705 model and people still want to keep tier 10 Obj 263

 

So, I believe THAT is the exact reason they are doing this.

Then Serb will just troll the Forums and laugh.

.

shenanigans.

get the brooms.



Slatherer #6 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 33523 battles
  • 3,419
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014

View PostToothDecay, on Jan 24 2018 - 19:48, said:

 

So, I believe THAT is the exact reason they are doing this.

Then Serb will just troll the Forums and laugh.

.

shenanigans.

get the brooms.

 

I was just gonna say the same thing.  Put it out before the wave of dissent grows too much. 

 



SnowPanzer #7 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 04:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 44747 battles
  • 2,982
  • [G-M-U] G-M-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011
The World of (Soviet) Tanks continues

KaiserWilhelmShatner #8 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 15823 battles
  • 4,194
  • [F_O_G] F_O_G
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostSnowPanzer, on Jan 24 2018 - 19:57, said:

The World of (Soviet) Tanks continues

 



DoctorThe19th #9 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 14030 battles
  • 2,913
  • [DEVON] DEVON
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostDeadArashi, on Jan 24 2018 - 19:43, said:

It's ridiculous that they're forcing it when there's issues with the Obj 257 and 705 model and people still want to keep tier 10 Obj 263

 

nothing wrong about the last reason as their are far more pressing ones to deal with.

people didn't want to lose their WT auf e100 either but they did huh? It's not like they're completely removing it either.

 

1. As you said 257 is [edited]op but I feel like the Object 260 reward tank already has that type of armor so not sure if that's a huge deal.

2. We still don't know the tier 10s for the T-10 and Obj 430 II which should be decided this patch.

3. SU-122-54 status should or could be changed??

 



DeadArashi #10 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:15

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 20 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013

View PostSlatherer, on Jan 25 2018 - 03:53, said:

 

I was just gonna say the same thing.  Put it out before the wave of dissent grows too much. 

 

 

Before? The Russians have a 94 page thread of negativity since the Obj 263 change was announced

DeadArashi #11 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:20

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 20 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013

View PostDoctorThe19th, on Jan 25 2018 - 04:10, said:

 

nothing wrong about the last reason as their are far more pressing ones to deal with.

people didn't want to lose their WT auf e100 either but they did huh? It's not like they're completely removing it either.

 

1. As you said 257 is [edited]op but I feel like the Object 260 reward tank already has that type of armor so not sure if that's a huge deal.

2. We still don't know the tier 10s for the T-10 and Obj 430 II which should be decided this patch.

3. SU-122-54 status should or could be changed??

 

 

WT was removed cause it was OP af, but the Type 5 would rebalance the crapout of it and WG have said they want to bring it back as a reward of some kind, I'm thinking it will have the Chinese server stats.


1. The Obj 257 would be easy to fix though; remove the ghost spaced armor and make the transmission at the back of the tank damageable. People can get their tracking shots while also damaging it and it won't be an OP side scraper

2. T-10 I believe is supposed to be the Obj 777 Ver 2

3. As much as I would love to keep the SU-122-54, it's WG so I'm sensing an FV4202 situation; remove it from everyone then sell it back as a tier 8 premium for max profit



Slatherer #12 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 33523 battles
  • 3,419
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014

View PostDeadArashi, on Jan 24 2018 - 20:15, said:

 

Before? The Russians have a 94 page thread of negativity since the Obj 263 change was announced

 

All the more reason! 



heavymetal1967 #13 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 64730 battles
  • 17,232
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

Word of warning folks.

 

I'd also be tempted to claim my Holiday Ops females and set my tank discounts before the patch.  Because at least at one point they moved the deadline date forward indicating that was because the patch date moved forward.  Then they moved it back with no explanation and afaik no further comments.

 

And they made us claim the compensation female before the next patch hit.

 

Everything may be fine, but considering WG's track record of late I wouldn't (and didn't) chance it.  Unless they give some definitive clarification and tbh I'd still be skeptical.



heavymetal1967 #14 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 64730 battles
  • 17,232
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostDeadArashi, on Jan 24 2018 - 23:15, said:

 

Before? The Russians have a 94 page thread of negativity since the Obj 263 change was announced

 

View PostSlatherer, on Jan 24 2018 - 23:36, said:

 

All the more reason! 

 

That and EU to a lesser extent may be the only impetus for them to rethink things.  Our paltry numbers in comparison likely won't be, but if the other servers are singing the same verse then hopefully they'll get a clue and a care. 

 

But them moving the patch up isn't a good sign.  More like them building a spite fence for the neighbors.



Slim_Shadee #15 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:51

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 6356 battles
  • 764
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011

View PostDeadArashi, on Jan 25 2018 - 03:43, said:

It's ridiculous that they're forcing it when there's issues with the Obj 257 and 705 model and people still want to keep tier 10 Obj 263

 

In your mind there are issues, on the RU server which this is catering to again, NO ISSUES despite the 94 pager which on NA is like a half page...keep the Mother, err money server happy is the motto

Edited by Slim_Shadee, Jan 25 2018 - 05:52.


heavymetal1967 #16 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 05:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 64730 battles
  • 17,232
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostDeadArashi, on Jan 24 2018 - 23:20, said:

3. As much as I would love to keep the SU-122-54, it's WG so I'm sensing an FV4202 situation; remove it from everyone then sell it back as a tier 8 premium for max profit

 

Either that or as some folks have surmised making it a reward tank for the second set of PMs that supposedly are coming.  

Tahllol #17 Posted Jan 25 2018 - 06:53

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 10823 battles
  • 1,016
  • Member since:
    01-31-2016

View PostSnowPanzer, on Jan 25 2018 - 04:57, said:

The World of (Soviet) Tanks continues

 

Dude the soviet tanks aren't even the most OP tanks around that would be the badger and the now fake [edited]autoloaders. The Russian and American tanks overall have been power creeped to [edited].

Mikosah #18 Posted Jan 30 2018 - 19:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 17582 battles
  • 3,915
  • Member since:
    01-24-2013
Its very suspicious that they're only rushing faster to release a patch that's been so widely and thoroughly criticized. I don't know what WG is thinking, but this situation doesn't smell right.

lightball20 #19 Posted Jan 30 2018 - 21:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 27969 battles
  • 3,414
  • [R3TRO] R3TRO
  • Member since:
    02-18-2013

View PostMikosah, on Jan 30 2018 - 10:38, said:

Its very suspicious that they're only rushing faster to release a patch that's been so widely and thoroughly criticized. I don't know what WG is thinking, but this situation doesn't smell right.

 

I mean they have already made it a point that they don't care what people say about the TD changes. They have decided: Stats say its balanced we don't give a craphow much you complain.

 

So that only leaves the Heavy/Medium changes to be something that would cause any delay to the patch.

And the complaint about we are missing the two unknown heavies. They stated a few times that they would not come this patch. There will likely be a 9.23 sometime between now and 1.0 that will include the two new Tier 10s if not they will be in 1.0 but I don't think there was EVER ANY plan for them to be included in 9.22

 

I don't think its so much them rushing this patch as: They already had the 10.0 Rubicon [edited]and now have decided: We announced 1.0. We announced when its released. AND BY [edited]GOD IS IT BEING RELEASED WHEN WE SAID IT WAS!!



pyerm #20 Posted Jan 31 2018 - 00:29

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10198 battles
  • 27
  • Member since:
    09-19-2011

this is to all you you on this subject. the one and only reason WG would do any thing is $$$. it is true that our population is minuscule compared to the rest of the world, but, we are Americans. we will happily pay $6.00 for a 75 cent cup of coffee and think we are getting a screaming deal. cause the coffee is just... so... good! any one with half a fried brain cell would jump on the opportunity to get his/her hand in our pockets. americans will pay for air wafting up from a job site rent-a-can if you told them that it's the best air money can buy and it's good for you. WG knows this, and is taking advantage of that fact. as would any one who had found a mark with heavy pockets.

 







Also tagged with 9.22

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users