Jump to content


Incoming! Mediterranean Invasion


  • Please log in to reply
70 replies to this topic

MozzaBurger #61 Posted Jan 29 2018 - 17:40

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15221 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-03-2011
The Prosciutto M35. Mmmm.

power_Donky #62 Posted Jan 29 2018 - 21:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 24936 battles
  • 3,040
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    11-06-2013

View PostTc978, on Jan 27 2018 - 07:40, said:

This seems like it could be an interesting mechanic. However, do we really need a new nation, with several lines, and a new gun mechanic now? T8 matchmaking is still crappy, the old maps are still looking like they are, (Not Hd, and quite repetitive). Furthermore, grand battles still only has one map. (Full disclosure, I do not own a T10 tank, I just know several people who want a new map for the grand battles). I feel like this could wait for a while after the "1.0" update unless it releases new maps (I have heard nothing about that). Also, I am a little concerned about the viability of true autoloading tanks, especially mediums. Comparing this tank to other autoloading mediums, who would want to play the others? Unless it is a tank with better mobility, armor, etc these new tanks seem to be a lot more flexible. Just my 2 cents Wargaming. 

ARE 

YOU

RETARDED???



01LT #63 Posted Jan 29 2018 - 21:36

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28902 battles
  • 69
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013

Yes new tanks new nations are good and your starting to complicate game play but would rather seen NEW MAPS and not just old maps made pretty. WOT spend more time developing new maps WOT.  Full grid layout city map  with no little mounds of rubble you cant drive over. and not funneling corridors, and second a full on FOREST map one with no hills and no more than 50 meters visibility until trees are  knocked down by driving over them a map that makes you use your  mini map and radar.

 

Also expand the Japanese tank line with some Tank Destroyers and SPG's

 

once again would rather see BRAND NEW MAPS instead of NEW TANKS


Edited by 01LT, Jan 30 2018 - 21:27.


Anlushac11 #64 Posted Jan 29 2018 - 22:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 35975 battles
  • 2,308
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013

View PostCmdr_Adama_BSG75, on Jan 26 2018 - 21:32, said:

Not another damn autoloader. If you are gonna do this silly stuff, then buff the damn Tiger 1. The most feared tank of WW2 and its gotta face tanks made 10-15 years later. STUPID. How a Tiger 1 and a T-29 end up on the same battlefield is beyond wishful thinking, its a fantasy. And to put it up against tier IX heavies is a freaking JOKE. You guys spend all this time and effort on making historically accurate looking tanks, then place them against tanks that weren't even dreamed of at the time they were made. I started playing this game years ago because of the allure of playing a Tiger. I soon found out its a PAPER Tiger. Same with the 131 and the HT-6, they should NOT be seeing the armor on tier VIIIs. You get into a tier VIII battle in those and you just better go hide. Same in a Tiger 1 at tier IX. 

And now you want to make another tank line. As an autoloader. May as well allow 5 arties per game. When are we going to see the"Tank Girl" tank?

 

Tiger rant over. You wanted feedback, you got it.

 

Meaning no disrespect Sir but the T29 and T34 were designed starting March 1944. They were finished too late to see action in WW2.

Anlushac11 #65 Posted Jan 29 2018 - 22:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 35975 battles
  • 2,308
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013

View Posttyphlosion57, on Jan 28 2018 - 00:06, said:

 

you do realize that the tiger is too op for tier 6 so tier 7 is the best place for it especially since they're gave it the tiger 2s irl 8.8cm gun? the tiger with the second best gun was the irl tiger 1 so if you wanna be historically accurate then go into tier 9 games with that gun. As for the fact that it faces tier 9s its not like other tanks at tier 7 dont face tanks that are 10-15 ahead of its time. The IS is a prime example, has a worse gun than the tiger and still faces tier 9s. Infact, the tiger 1 and tiger p have the second best pen at tier 7. They along with the french tier 7 are the only ones at tier 7 that have more than 200mm of base ap pen which helps it against tier 9s. Sure even with prems tier 7s aren't meant to be facing tier 9s but thats why they changed the mm so that you only see a max of 3 tanks on the enemy team that are 2 tiers above you. And on the comment that its armor is trash, the tigers armor is good when ANGLED against tier 6s and 5s. If by tier 7 you dont know how to do that then thats on you. Obviously 100mm of armor isnt good against tier 9s, if it was the tiger would be a higher tier tank. 

 

The IS looks at its still reasonable pen and laughs at the Tiger I 's feeble alpha damage..."Load another 122mm AP Mikahil"

goatjuice69 #66 Posted Jan 30 2018 - 01:19

    Private

  • Players
  • 16169 battles
  • 3
  • [SHRKE] SHRKE
  • Member since:
    02-26-2011

Why give them are opinions when they didn't listen the about the object 263?

 



Cmdr_Adama_BSG75 #67 Posted Jan 30 2018 - 02:28

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 35612 battles
  • 225
  • [GST] GST
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostAnlushac11, on Jan 29 2018 - 15:53, said:

 

Meaning no disrespect Sir but the T29 and T34 were designed starting March 1944. They were finished too late to see action in WW2.

My answer back to that would be "When was development of the Tiger 1 begun?" And you answer should be "​....1937, or a little bit thereafter. And the first prototype was delivered in April of 1942". 

 

 

View PostAnlushac11, on Jan 29 2018 - 15:56, said:

 

The IS looks at its still reasonable pen and laughs at the Tiger I 's feeble alpha damage..."Load another 122mm AP Mikahil"

You got that right.



Cmdr_Adama_BSG75 #68 Posted Jan 30 2018 - 02:36

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 35612 battles
  • 225
  • [GST] GST
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostDaigensui, on Jan 27 2018 - 02:33, said:

 

Why is it that it is always the bad players whining about such trivial things.

Why is someone always bringing up game stats? No one asked for your opinion on that. You actually took the time to look up my stats before replying. Thats sad. 

 



DraconX3 #69 Posted Jan 30 2018 - 02:46

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 10143 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    07-15-2010
Somebody toucha mah spaghett!!!!

CapturedDiamond #70 Posted Feb 02 2018 - 00:29

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 771 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014
War Thunder beat you to it!

Ktigris1 #71 Posted Feb 06 2018 - 19:19

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 16423 battles
  • 54
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

Where can I apply to test this new tank out? Would love helping in the testing of it.

 






3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users