Jump to content


Why is WG still letting team mates shoot each other?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
90 replies to this topic

ESX #1 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:22

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25590 battles
  • 1,713
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

The game is not realistic, accurate, or even close.  It is a fantasy game with tanks and made up RNG, armor, pen, and everything else.  The most realistic part of this game is the tank models.  So why hasn't WG removed the ability to shoot allies?  All it does is let babies throw a tantrum and shoot another player on their team.  What exactly does this add to the game that is so important that WG has ignored a simple fix?

 

No, it does not make the game better with it.  People try to not waste a shot and hit their team mate anyway, so those arguments are not valid.  Players trolling and shooting their own team mates are a much bigger issue.


Edited by ESX, Feb 12 2018 - 15:57.


Nudnick #2 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:26

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 23699 battles
  • 3,262
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
Because it's a Russian game, and Russians think everyone is the enemy.

Ndtm #3 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 17375 battles
  • 3,973
  • Member since:
    05-01-2012
Because it means you can't just fling shots without a care in the world and actually have to be aware of what your team is doing, and that's especially true for artillery, with their multi meter splash they can't just drop shells wherever they want (like if an enemy is facehugging a friendly normally the arty wouldn't shoot that guy since it would hit the friendly too)

Hellsfog #4 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 32240 battles
  • 4,735
  • [D-O-S] D-O-S
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostESX, on Feb 12 2018 - 09:22, said:

The game is not realistic, accurate, or even close.  It is a fantasy game with tanks and made up RNG, armor, pen, and everything else.  The most realistic part of this game is the tank models.  So why hasn't WG removed the ability to shoot allies?  All it does is let babies throw a tantrum and shoot another player on their team.  What exactly does this add to the game that is so important that WG has ignored a simple fix?

 

Even with all these problems, you still bought an account. 

KatzeWolf #5 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:28

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29 battles
  • 424
  • Member since:
    09-10-2012
Because it adds and extra dynamic to the game. It's better with it.

Firemoth #6 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 36482 battles
  • 3,823
  • Member since:
    05-21-2011
im wondering why WG lets people buy other players accounts for money. surely theres going to be a security issue

Edited by Firemoth, Feb 12 2018 - 15:37.


Worland #7 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 16765 battles
  • 4,925
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
The game is far better with team damage. Yet, I would not be surprised they eventually turn it off.

Bavor #8 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:43

    Major

  • Players
  • 30466 battles
  • 2,718
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

View PostESX, on Feb 12 2018 - 09:22, said:

The game is not realistic, accurate, or even close.  It is a fantasy game with tanks and made up RNG, armor, pen, and everything else.  The most realistic part of this game is the tank models.  So why hasn't WG removed the ability to shoot allies?  All it does is let babies throw a tantrum and shoot another player on their team.  What exactly does this add to the game that is so important that WG has ignored a simple fix?

 

You bought that account knowing of the issue already? Why spend money on an account when you don't like the game?

Duke_Nuke_Em_Cammando #9 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:43

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 7205 battles
  • 97
  • [BOTZ] BOTZ
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012
how is shooting your allies not realistic its more realistic than not being able too it takes the fun out of it. leave it in game


mohawkdriver #10 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:48

    Captain

  • Players
  • 20685 battles
  • 1,332
  • [_RTF_] _RTF_
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013
OP, go play CoD if you want a button that says "allow friendly fire".  

ESX #11 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:52

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25590 battles
  • 1,713
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostHellsfog, on Feb 12 2018 - 14:27, said:

 

Even with all these problems, you still bought an account. 

 

Reported for not only lying but stupidity.

ESX #12 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:53

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25590 battles
  • 1,713
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostBavor, on Feb 12 2018 - 14:43, said:

 

You bought that account knowing of the issue already? Why spend money on an account when you don't like the game?

 

Reported for lying and stupidity.

heavymetal1967 #13 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 63376 battles
  • 16,518
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostESX, on Feb 12 2018 - 09:52, said:

 

Reported for not only lying but stupidity.

 

Reported for lying?  :ohmy:  Even if he was lying. :D

 

What about the E-feels box?   Did you check that one too?

 

 

 



PelhamBlue #14 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:55

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 10009 battles
  • 377
  • Member since:
    01-18-2016
I love when they buy an account with lots of battles and unicum stats, and don't even bother to pretend they already know how the game works. At least, spend some gold and get a new name.

The best part was when the new "administrator" started posting, he didn't try to write like he previous at all. It went from unicum posts to "why do I get penned every time in my Tiger I?!? Buff the Tiger!"

ESX #15 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:58

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25590 battles
  • 1,713
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostPelhamBlue, on Feb 12 2018 - 14:55, said:

I love when they buy an account with lots of battles and unicum stats, and don't even bother to pretend they already know how the game works. At least, spend some gold and get a new name.

The best part was when the new "administrator" started posting, he didn't try to write like he previous at all. It went from unicum posts to "why do I get penned every time in my Tiger I?!? Buff the Tiger!"

 

Reported for lying and stupidity.

ESX #16 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 15:59

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25590 battles
  • 1,713
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View Postmohawkdriver, on Feb 12 2018 - 14:48, said:

OP, go play CoD if you want a button that says "allow friendly fire".  

 

Go play another game if you want realism.

dunniteowl #17 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 16:01

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 20578 battles
  • 3,689
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014
Reported for unrealistic expectations.

heavymetal1967 #18 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 16:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 63376 battles
  • 16,518
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012
:popcorn:

RumRunner151 #19 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 16:02

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30150 battles
  • 962
  • Member since:
    03-11-2013

View PostNdtm, on Feb 12 2018 - 08:27, said:

Because it means you can't just fling shots without a care in the world and actually have to be aware of what your team is doing, and that's especially true for artillery, with their multi meter splash they can't just drop shells wherever they want (like if an enemy is facehugging a friendly normally the arty wouldn't shoot that guy since it would hit the friendly too)

This

 

View PostESX, on Feb 12 2018 - 08:58, said:

Reported for lying and stupidity.

Reported, just for stupidity though.



NutrientibusMeaGallus #20 Posted Feb 12 2018 - 16:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 19382 battles
  • 4,902
  • [FILOX] FILOX
  • Member since:
    10-26-2012
Reported for reporting reporters reporting...... O.o




6 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users