Jump to content


luser_007 (AIMED) supporting cheaters ?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
19 replies to this topic

HurryUpAndDie #1 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:21

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36579 battles
  • 608
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011
so this guy in first place techicly to have this amount of points hasent slep since the begining of this tournament ? unless 2 person his playing the same account wich is considered cheating so is AIMED supporting cheaters ? and before people start saying youre just mad cuz you arent first for the laptop i dont want it but i also dont support cheaters in anyways 

Edited by HurryUpAndDie, Mar 26 2018 - 00:23.


Blackhorse_One_ #2 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:23

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 2373 battles
  • 1,238
  • [HHT] HHT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2017

Name and Shame?

 

T - e - c - h - n - i - c - a - l - l - y ...


Edited by Blackhorse_One_, Mar 26 2018 - 00:25.


WhineMaker #3 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 32180 battles
  • 3,340
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
#OP'sPantiesInAWad

RoIito #4 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:32

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 11067 battles
  • 563
  • [TNKGG] TNKGG
  • Member since:
    12-23-2016
Play low tier, rush and die in 30 seconds, rinse and repeat.

HurryUpAndDie #5 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:34

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36579 battles
  • 608
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View PostRoIito, on Mar 25 2018 - 23:32, said:

Play low tier, rush and die in 30 seconds, rinse and repeat.

 

yes i understand that but do the math even if hes doing that wich he obvs is theres no way theres not 2 person sharing 1 account basicly hasent slep since this thing started

Edited by HurryUpAndDie, Mar 26 2018 - 00:36.


Worland #6 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 16765 battles
  • 4,914
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
Ur anglisch r r33l33 bawd

CDNTankerjoe #7 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 00:57

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 67271 battles
  • 40
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013
all they would have to do is look at the ip address playing the account???

HurryUpAndDie #8 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36579 battles
  • 608
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View PostCDNTankerjoe, on Mar 25 2018 - 23:57, said:

all they would have to do is look at the ip address playing the account???

 

what those the ip prove if were 2 person playing from the same pc ? nothing at all 

9435 #9 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:17

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 147 battles
  • 501
  • Member since:
    10-29-2015

View PostHurryUpAndDie, on Mar 26 2018 - 01:04, said:

 

what those the ip prove if were 2 person playing from the same pc ? nothing at all 

 

And why are you crying on here like a little girl?  Good for them if they can play that long.  It's probably a bot account or a WG employee account.

Edited by 9435, Mar 26 2018 - 01:17.


HurryUpAndDie #10 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:29

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36579 battles
  • 608
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View Post9435, on Mar 26 2018 - 00:17, said:

 

And why are you crying on here like a little girl?  Good for them if they can play that long.  It's probably a bot account or a WG employee account.

 

how bout you use youre actuall account if you got any comments to make ? 

GeorgePreddy #11 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:30

    Major

  • Players
  • 14345 battles
  • 8,941
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

View PostHurryUpAndDie, on Mar 25 2018 - 20:34, said:

 

yes i understand that but do the math even if hes doing that wich he obvs is theres no way theres not 2 person sharing 1 account basicly hasent slep since this thing started   No, you do the math, you are the one casting aspersions.

 

Please show your work or you get a zero on this math test (said every math teacher the world has ever known).

GeorgePreddy #12 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:35

    Major

  • Players
  • 14345 battles
  • 8,941
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

View PostHurryUpAndDie, on Mar 25 2018 - 20:21, said:

so this guy in first place techicly to have this amount of points hasent slep since the begining of this tournament ? unless 2 person his playing the same account wich is considered cheating so is AIMED supporting cheaters ? and before people start saying youre just mad cuz you arent first for the laptop i dont want it but i also dont support cheaters in anyways 

 



HurryUpAndDie #13 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:37

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36579 battles
  • 608
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View PostGeorgePreddy, on Mar 26 2018 - 00:30, said:

 

Please show your work or you get a zero on this math test (said every math teacher the world has ever known).

 

sure there roughly 72 hours since this thing started lets say 5 mins a game and less in tier 2-3-4 hes got about 800 points atm when ever its going to refresh in 20 mins 800 games at about 5 mins is roughly 67 hours so 67 hours played on 72 hours total ? i mean for 1 person alone its quite impossible

Edited by HurryUpAndDie, Mar 26 2018 - 01:39.


ThePigSheFlies #14 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 01:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 62526 battles
  • 16,045
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostHurryUpAndDie, on Mar 25 2018 - 19:37, said:

 

sure there roughly 72 hours since this thing started lets say 5 mins a game and less in tier 2-3-4 hes got about 800 points atm when ever its going to refresh in 20 mins 800 games at about 5 mins is roughly 67 hours so 67 hours played on 72 hours total ? i mean for 1 person alone its quite impossible

 

why do people like you keep insisting it's 5 minutes per game?

 

on common test, when the maps were new, and I was aggressive as all hell, I could easily get 3 different tier 10 LTs locked in battle before 5 minutes passed by making super aggressive initial passes to see what I could get away with.

 

while each match might take 5 minutes or more, he's not forced to sit and watch them after he dies...

 

I didn't even look at the event enough to know if there is/was a tier requirement, but if he's spamming tier 1/2 games, chances are good he's on small maps like mittengard which can often mean early death, and matches much, much faster than 5 minutes.



HurryUpAndDie #15 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 02:03

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36579 battles
  • 608
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View PostThePigSheFlies, on Mar 26 2018 - 00:52, said:

 

why do people like you keep insisting it's 5 minutes per game?

 

on common test, when the maps were new, and I was aggressive as all hell, I could easily get 3 different tier 10 LTs locked in battle before 5 minutes passed by making super aggressive initial passes to see what I could get away with.

 

while each match might take 5 minutes or more, he's not forced to sit and watch them after he dies...

 

I didn't even look at the event enough to know if there is/was a tier requirement, but if he's spamming tier 1/2 games, chances are good he's on small maps like mittengard which can often mean early death, and matches much, much faster than 5 minutes.

 

i clearly state 5 mins and less put them at 2mins thats still 60 hours you aint shaving much but good try at deffending a cheater i mean you are in simp so 

Edited by HurryUpAndDie, Mar 26 2018 - 02:07.


WhineMaker #16 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 02:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 32180 battles
  • 3,340
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View PostHurryUpAndDie, on Mar 25 2018 - 16:29, said:

 

how bout you use youre actuall account if you got any comments to make ? 

 

How about posting some actual evidence, before accusing someone of cheating... :great:

 

 

 

#OP'sPantiesInAWad



dominator_98 #17 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 02:47

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 18950 battles
  • 3,110
  • [NUFFS] NUFFS
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostThePigSheFlies, on Mar 25 2018 - 18:52, said:

I didn't even look at the event enough to know if there is/was a tier requirement, but if he's spamming tier 1/2 games, chances are good he's on small maps like mittengard which can often mean early death, and matches much, much faster than 5 minutes.

 

TBH you'd be better off at tier 3-4 where the scouts get really fast. Full yolo in a Pz 1 c is gonna give you like 8 initial spots, and that will probably put you in the top 10. 

 

And OP, you're allowed to have two people use the same account, so that wouldn't even be cheating. 



ThePigSheFlies #18 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 03:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 62526 battles
  • 16,045
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostHurryUpAndDie, on Mar 25 2018 - 20:03, said:

 

i clearly state 5 mins and less put them at 2mins thats still 60 hours you aint shaving much but good try at deffending a cheater i mean you are in simp so 

 

I don't pay attention to the leader board, how many stamps, or who's doing what, and I'm certainly not defending anyone, and you clearly haven't seen people "churn games".

 

given how bad the player base is, if one was that desperate to get free things, one could easily set fast light tanks up at various tiers as "primary" and race off every battle for early spots, some harassing/yolo style counter scout damage and die in even less than 90 seconds, rinse lather and repeat, and still manage to hit top 10 xp at a startlingly high rate.

 

but, I didn't even look at the mission requirements to begin with, and just noticed that fairly frequently yesterday I was getting two stamps in one match while zipping around in my tier 9 LTs.  I was winning, the map rotation wasn't horrible late in the day, and I stuck with it to get my garage slot, and the easy credits that were rolling in...

 

not once did I put half as much thought into conspiracy theories over what people might do as you obviously have - nor do I care.  I was simply stating that 5 minutes / game is a laughable estimate for someone that is obviously 'churning'

 

 



TheDouser #19 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 05:18

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 37614 battles
  • 84
  • [FGTVE] FGTVE
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012
I also noticed he has not slept in 3 days so yeah there is a very good chance he is account sharing which is of course against the ToS which should also be counted as cheating, but We will just have to see what they do when they do their fair play check before they award the prizes and see if they count account sharing as being against fair play. Should be rather easy for them to tell since yeah it will show his account logging in from different IP's but if it turns out he his innocent then well played to him and hope he does not die of sleep deprivation lol

Mezurashi #20 Posted Mar 26 2018 - 05:23

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 2177 battles
  • 216
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    03-31-2016
Topic locked. You're technically calling out the whole clan, please be careful.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users