Jump to content


What were the Grand Extravaganza Rules ?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
37 replies to this topic

Guido1212 #21 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 16:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 76956 battles
  • 7,987
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 14:46, said:

 

I haven't seen anyone breaking any rules.  Have you?

You are that dense!



TwixOps #22 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 16:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGuido1212, on Apr 06 2018 - 11:47, said:

You are that dense!

 

You didn't answer my question.  

_Gungrave_ #23 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 16:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 42202 battles
  • 16,299
  • [X-OUT] X-OUT
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postxrays_, on Apr 06 2018 - 15:40, said:

 

There's the clause that gets me, as there was so much harassment on the forums lately... But I'm sure that will be overlooked.

 

And remember, everyone, your own idea of cheating might not be WarGaming's idea of cheating!

 

x.

 

I don't think WG understands what tampering means in regards to video games...

spud_tuber #24 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 16:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 51895 battles
  • 6,466
  • Member since:
    08-26-2013

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 09:26, said:

 

The_dude just gave you one example of a rule under which both of those could be grounds for DQ.  That said, I don't really expect DQs for either. 

 

For hot seating/sock puppeting, despite prior occasional prior examples, WG won't look for proof as the effort to chance of finding proof is too low.  Maybe if they see an account logging in from multiple wildly separated IPs within a day or 2.

 

For hyper yolo, the lack of prior precedent limits their options without facing some serious backlash, so I expect nothing to happen with that either.



TwixOps #25 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Postspud_tuber, on Apr 06 2018 - 11:56, said:

For hot seating/sock puppeting, despite prior occasional prior examples, WG won't look for proof as the effort to chance of finding proof is too low.  Maybe if they see an account logging in from multiple wildly separated IPs within a day or 2.

There's no proof to look for, "Hot-seating" is allowed. 

For hyper yolo, the lack of prior precedent limits their options without facing some serious backlash, so I expect nothing to happen with that either.

I would also expect nothing to happen, there's nothing illegal or even questionable about maintaining a certain playstyle, regardless of whether you or I like it.  

 



ISNomads #26 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 34402 battles
  • 2,292
  • [WHAMO] WHAMO
  • Member since:
    11-30-2013
My only concern is about the event being shut down 3 hours early. Some people could have still been earning the credits. I am expecting we get the 2x XP weekend since we were about 20K stamps away before the event was shut down.

ISNomads #27 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 34402 battles
  • 2,292
  • [WHAMO] WHAMO
  • Member since:
    11-30-2013

View PostAtragon, on Apr 06 2018 - 05:24, said:

Thanks TWIX this is what I was looking for:

 

6. Tampering

... (iii) intending to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other Participants or Organizer’s Parties; and/or (iv) otherwise...

I am annoyed that any other tankers got more stamps than me, therefore, they should all be disqualified.



spud_tuber #28 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 51895 battles
  • 6,466
  • Member since:
    08-26-2013

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 10:05, said:

 

Maybe, if you'd read the first paragraph of what I wrote instead of editing it out of your quote...

 

Edit: to be a bit more clear, regardless of whether hot seating is allowed in general, it can easily be construed as against the rules of the contest itself, regardless of whether it is a violation of the EULA.  Indeed, WG has construed it as a violation of the rules of contests in the past when they knew sock puppeting/hot seating was going on, at least some times.



TwixOps #29 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Postspud_tuber, on Apr 06 2018 - 12:15, said:

Maybe, if you'd read the first paragraph of what I wrote instead of editing it out of your quote...

 

I edited it out because it was irrelevant, The_dude's example contained no merit.  

 

 



Guido1212 #30 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 76956 battles
  • 7,987
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 15:50, said:

 

You didn't answer my question.  

Because it’s been answered in half a dozen posts and you are simply being pedantic.



TwixOps #31 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 17:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGuido1212, on Apr 06 2018 - 12:52, said:

Because it’s been answered in half a dozen posts and you are simply being pedantic.

 

I have seen no answers providing examples of people breaking contest rules other than the hypotheical of someone using banned mods.  Try again.  

Guido1212 #32 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 18:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 76956 battles
  • 7,987
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 16:55, said:

 

I have seen no answers providing examples of people breaking contest rules other than the hypotheical of someone using banned mods.  Try again.  

A T-22 owner.  Now I understand the illogical contortions and inane stance about the rules.  

 

Standard worthless cheater and rationalizer.

 

Tell us all again about your incredible rigging skill and how you did it all legally because it was just a bunch of smart players figuring out how to obtain the tank through alternate means.

 

Don’t  forget to tell me I’m just jealous because I don’t have it and I wasn’t oh so clever enough to figure out how to rig games.

 

 

 

 



TwixOps #33 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 18:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGuido1212, on Apr 06 2018 - 13:01, said:

-snip-

 

 

You still didn't answer my question.   

Guido1212 #34 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 18:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 76956 battles
  • 7,987
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 17:02, said:

 

You still didn't answer my question.   

I did.  You’ve answered multiple posts explaining it to you and denying the answer exists which is exactly what T-22 riggers do.

 

You have zero credibility here.



TwixOps #35 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 18:12

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGuido1212, on Apr 06 2018 - 13:09, said:

I did.  

No you didn't.  Post a link to where you answered my question "What rules were there that weren't enforced?" or admit you just lied.  



Guido1212 #36 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 18:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 76956 battles
  • 7,987
  • [CARTL] CARTL
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011

View PostTwixOps, on Apr 06 2018 - 17:12, said:

No you didn't.  Post a link to where you answered my question "What rules were there that weren't enforced?" or admit you just lied.  

A link?  You mean a link to this whole thread?  Scroll up, read the posts, many which answered your question.  

 

And make sure to adjust the scarlet T-22.



TwixOps #37 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 18:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 48432 battles
  • 4,425
  • [T___T] T___T
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGuido1212, on Apr 06 2018 - 13:24, said:

A link?

Yes, a link to where you answered my question.  Are you ready to admit you lied?  



JayStark02 #38 Posted Apr 06 2018 - 23:12

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 5120 battles
  • 190
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015
Closing this thread before it gets out of hand.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users