General_Lee_Miserable, on Apr 16 2018 - 18:30, said:
Exactly
I've had zero dmg games and several at 1200 to 1300 and won in the 268-V4. I don't call it OP. I call it my good luck charm.
On the flip side, I shouldn't have 41.5% in my WZ-111-5a, with over 2,000 damage per battle. I haven't lit it up in that tank, but I haven't stunk it up either. Something like 900 dmg per would normally get that WR. But, it is what it is.
Moral of the story, WR isn't something you can look at as an absolute measure over a short period of time or small sample size. If the 268-V4 has a 57% on NA in 6 months, then I'll change my tune.
LOL dude you have a SIXTY TWO PERCENT WIN RATE in the 268v4. Your next best win rate is the - big shocker here - 430U, the second most OP'd tank in the game. But fine let's not look at just win rate for you and the 268v4.
In 11 of 180 matches in the 268v4, you were high caliber. Once every 16 battles. In your other tier X vehicles COMBINED, you have 20 in 1263 battles. Once every 63 battles... so you do WAAAAAAY more damage in this tank than your other tier X tanks.
In 17 of 180 matches in the 268v4, you had steel wall. Once every 10.5 battles. In your other heavily armored tanks (counting just IS7, Maus, e100, Super Conq, Type 5), you had steel wall in 45 of 661 matches. Once every 14.6 battles. Not that big of a difference (at least not when compared to the damage numbers above), but those other tanks are superheavies, who sacrifice everything for armor, and yet you do better at absorbing damage in the 268v4 than you do in all those other tanks.
If someone like you does that much better in this tank than you do in every other similar tank you play, and most everyone else sees the same thing, there's a problem. But hey if I were you I guess I would keep relying on the crutch that is this tank until they nerf it. Why bother to learn tactics when you can hit W, point, and shoot, and win?