Jump to content


Warhammer 40,000 Tanks Storm the Battlefield.- Dwight Schrute

Office Dwight KRZY Tank sale 40k warhammer new skin

  • Please log in to reply
177 replies to this topic

CapPhrases #161 Posted May 18 2018 - 19:04

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 7276 battles
  • 3,486
  • [TXV] TXV
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostBLAZE_511, on May 18 2018 - 12:16, said:

 

That is a heretical statement, it is obviously the Death Korps of Krieg.

Spoiler

 

Also Wargaming please give us crews to go along with it.

 

Yarrick disagrees

 

still that's a neat crew skin mod. :great:



Realign #162 Posted May 18 2018 - 19:58

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27851 battles
  • 1,963
  • [RS] RS
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View PostNagatoroHayase, on May 16 2018 - 18:44, said:

Spoiler

 

This, people are so stuck on the fact it's from an anime they blindly ignore that it's basically a Tiger II with cosmetic changes. Also the QB has convinced the world that this thing is overpowered despite anyone with any knowledge of the game can look at its stat lines and see that it is not. And just proof of fact you have this:

This thing has a 47% winrate and is one of the worst tier 8 heavies in the game. It's average damage dealt and stopped are both on the bottom too (meaning the armor doesn't stop [edited]).  Anyone who uses the excuse that it's overpowered is delusional.

 

You see that 'small data set' disclaimer?  The site is literally telling you to use caution when interpreting the results because it has 1/26th the number of games compared the actual lowest winrate tank (tiger 2).  You know less than John Snow....  Here's where you could actually look at what it packs https://tanks.gg/compare/tiger-ii?t=nameless%7Eis-3%7Et32%7Eamx-65-t .  I have no issue if they want to add anime tank visuals/cosmetics.  I actually support that for people who want it.  My issue is with adding tanks that are significantly better in too many categories when compared to typical same tier tanks.



RealBattousai #163 Posted May 18 2018 - 23:11

    Captain

  • Players
  • 37672 battles
  • 1,459
  • [ARKAM] ARKAM
  • Member since:
    02-02-2012
LOL you smell that... the stench of desperation over at Wargaming... pathetic.

Wombatmetal #164 Posted May 19 2018 - 02:11

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17050 battles
  • 1,596
  • [NMKJT] NMKJT
  • Member since:
    06-03-2013
The cost is outrageous. The cost of a T6 Heavy Premium is right around $17, so you shell out another $17 for a camo that provides no benefit in the game. It is absurd. 

Plutonius #165 Posted May 19 2018 - 07:23

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 4551 battles
  • 5
  • [RYZIN] RYZIN
  • Member since:
    10-11-2014
Hello. Anyone else having problems with the Mordian paint? I got it and it was fine then the next day I logged on and it is now gone. I go to website for it and it says page not found and when I click on the Mordian Paint it says" Unable to apply. Mordian is not in inventory."

Grospoliner #166 Posted May 19 2018 - 14:12

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17092 battles
  • 149
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View Post4TankersAndDog, on May 18 2018 - 11:47, said:

 

Wow, so much ranting in here...it's a virtual tank in a compute game, lighten up Francis.

 

Anyway, Qwertye, here ya go:

 

 

I don't hate this.



TLWiz #167 Posted May 19 2018 - 14:49

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 20605 battles
  • 9,363
  • [DSSRT] DSSRT
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014

View PostRangeTarget, on May 17 2018 - 13:53, said:

So, when do we get hover tanks (Hammer's Slammers) or BOLO MK XXXIII's? They are just as much paper tanks as the other stuff here. I want my Hellbore!!!!

 

Maybe WG could develop World of Bolos or a Hammer's Slammers separate game. I'd be in for that!  It would be nice to not drift WoT too far away from reality or at least reality based tanks. When we start seeing anime cartoon tanks I will speak for myself only and say that would be dropping a big turd.

 

WG does have to do things to keep WoT somewhat fresh and after many years I think they are doing a good job - so I continue to play.


Edited by TLWiz, May 19 2018 - 14:52.


TLWiz #168 Posted May 19 2018 - 14:51

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 20605 battles
  • 9,363
  • [DSSRT] DSSRT
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014

View PostWombatmetal, on May 19 2018 - 02:11, said:

The cost is outrageous. The cost of a T6 Heavy Premium is right around $17, so you shell out another $17 for a camo that provides no benefit in the game. It is absurd. 

 

No problem.  Buying it is not mandatory.

Huma474 #169 Posted May 19 2018 - 20:12

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 4550 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-03-2014

View PostWombatmetal, on May 19 2018 - 01:11, said:

The cost is outrageous. The cost of a T6 Heavy Premium is right around $17, so you shell out another $17 for a camo that provides no benefit in the game. It is absurd. 

 

The camo not providing a buff is a bug that should be fixed soon if its not fixed already, a wargaming Mod confirmed the 0 camo benefit was a bug earlier in this thread.

tonkmato #170 Posted May 19 2018 - 20:46

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14124 battles
  • 1,045
  • Member since:
    04-27-2012
Thought that was fixed 2 days ago

Plutonius #171 Posted May 20 2018 - 14:29

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 4551 battles
  • 5
  • [RYZIN] RYZIN
  • Member since:
    10-11-2014
What happened to the Mordian skin?

Elbroth #172 Posted May 20 2018 - 17:06

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 32148 battles
  • 624
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011
Waist of money for a tank skin

ToothDecay #173 Posted May 23 2018 - 22:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 26437 battles
  • 5,939
  • [NARC] NARC
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostSpectreHD, on May 16 2018 - 08:51, said:

Here comes the "No fun allowed!" crowd.

 

Miss my Ork M6A2E1 skin.

 

Reminds me of Tank Girl.

Kinda creative, that one.

nice job !

+1, oc



krewllkplr #174 Posted May 24 2018 - 18:06

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 28909 battles
  • 17
  • [FLASH] FLASH
  • Member since:
    09-09-2014
why, it is not h ard to go up the tree to the kv2, I don't understand this at all

Necrophore #175 Posted May 24 2018 - 19:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 29804 battles
  • 3,979
  • [LONER] LONER
  • Member since:
    02-19-2012

View Postkrewllkplr, on May 24 2018 - 09:06, said:

why, it is not h ard to go up the tree to the kv2, I don't understand this at all

 

A premium KV-2 means my KV-2 crew can be moved somewhere else (along with the BIA crew that came with it). That's probably hundreds of battles I don't have to do, plus the fraction-million credits I get back from selling the old KV-2. (Still on the fence for actually buying one myself, but there are advantages in trading in the regular for the premium.)

EternalAegis #176 Posted May 28 2018 - 12:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 27107 battles
  • 13
  • [K-Z] K-Z
  • Member since:
    01-01-2012

This is the kind of thing WG needs to be selling. If WG focused on selling reskins of tanks, and balanced tank gameplay this game would be fantastic. 

I'd totally shell out for some historical skins of an M4 sherman or cromwell. Non-Historical reskins are fine too as long as I can turn other player skins off. 

Good job WG!

Now fix 357



PraiseRNGesvs #177 Posted Jun 01 2018 - 10:24

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37792 battles
  • 119
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013
I really like these, though I don't know anything about War Hammer. I always wanted a premium KV-2, and here is my chance, but 34$? For a premium tier 6 heavy? And 10$ for a skin for the BDR? Pretty pricee. Heck, I thought the tier 7 Vk 45.03 was pricee at that price point.

Just figured I would give my feedback.

At 18.99 for a re-skinned version of the HT N0.6 I wouldn't figure the KV-2 would be above 20$. I think at that extra 14$ price point I will just keep my mandatory KV-2 in my hangar and enjoy that.

Gamma_383 #178 Posted Jun 04 2018 - 00:42

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 30880 battles
  • 309
  • [-KKT-] -KKT-
  • Member since:
    03-25-2013
 i got   BDR G1 B w/Mordian but cant find 100% crew




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users