Jump to content


Warhammer 40,000 Tanks Storm the Battlefield.- Dwight Schrute

Office Dwight KRZY Tank sale 40k warhammer new skin

  • Please log in to reply
177 replies to this topic

hadukem #61 Posted May 16 2018 - 18:49

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 35545 battles
  • 20
  • [-ZOO-] -ZOO-
  • Member since:
    12-30-2011

Premium kv2 more credits and exp 

 



NagatoroHayase #62 Posted May 16 2018 - 18:52

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19085 battles
  • 65
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012
Just a reminder for anyone who approves of this tank and not the Valkyrie Chronicles tanks, you're a hypocrite.

sometims_naive #63 Posted May 16 2018 - 18:57

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 36471 battles
  • 131
  • [UGKB] UGKB
  • Member since:
    08-24-2014

View PostBravoguns, on May 16 2018 - 14:38, said:

As long as we don’t see bright blue predators with las cannons, eldar fire prisms, monoliths,

ork battlewagons, I’m cool.

i enjoy 40k a lot. I just don’t want to mix up the two.

although zipping about in a riptide would be interesting

 

Could use a big trakk reskin on Germab glass cannons though.

Backfire_ #64 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 28985 battles
  • 2,252
  • [X-OUT] X-OUT
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View PostNagatoroHayase, on May 16 2018 - 12:52, said:

Just a reminder for anyone who approves of this tank and not the Valkyrie Chronicles tanks, you're a hypocrite.

 

Except those aren't skins, they're actually unique tanks and one of them is broken AF...  I could care less if they offered skins from that game and crews that shout gibberish in absurdly high pitched schoolgirl voices though.  More the merrier with cosmetics.  Anyone upset by these kinds of tanks need to just click 'hide non-historical' and move on, this stuff isn't any more atrocious than giant purple Maus.  Getting more cash from cosmetic type stuff is an ideal revenue stream for WG since it has no impact on game play (I mean adding more kv-2s into tier 6 might be wonky, but not like adding a new defender into the game).  Now they just need to kick that income over to their dev's for mechanics revisions and for map development.

NagatoroHayase #65 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:08

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19085 battles
  • 65
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostRealign, on May 17 2018 - 03:06, said:

 

Except those aren't skins, they're actually unique tanks and one of them is broken AF...  I could care less if they offered skins from that game and crews that shout gibberish in absurdly high pitched schoolgirl voices though.  More the merrier with cosmetics.  Anyone upset by these kinds of tanks need to just click 'hide non-historical' and move on, this stuff isn't any more atrocious than giant purple Maus.  Getting more cash from cosmetic type stuff is an ideal revenue stream for WG since it has no impact on game play (I mean adding more kv-2s into tier 6 might be wonky, but not like adding a new defender into the game).  Now they just need to kick that income over to their dev's for mechanics revisions and for map development.

 

>50% winrate, which is what you want

>47% winrate and worst winrate of all tier 8 heavies

 

I see nothing broken here. The only overpowered thing about these tanks is the bias shown by Quickybaby in his tank review of them.


Edited by NagatoroHayase, May 16 2018 - 19:12.


yewchung #66 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 21807 battles
  • 4,765
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-03-2011

Yeah but when will we get the REAL DEAL like on WoTBlitz ?

 



yewchung #67 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 21807 battles
  • 4,765
  • [NEWBI] NEWBI
  • Member since:
    05-03-2011

Also much better trailer:



ThePigSheFlies #68 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:35

    Major

  • Players
  • 65646 battles
  • 16,566
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

why are these weird camo's a "thing" and why can't we break them up?

 

e.g.  take the numbers off the frontline camo's, and other similar embellishments for this and other special camo packages?



Backfire_ #69 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 28985 battles
  • 2,252
  • [X-OUT] X-OUT
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View PostNagatoroHayase, on May 16 2018 - 13:08, said:

 

>50% winrate, which is what you want

>47% winrate and worst winrate of all tier 8 heavies

 

I see nothing broken here. The only overpowered thing about these tanks is the bias shown by Quickybaby in his tank review of them.

 

Nameless has 268v4 issues.  We've all seen the stupid that is speed and armor in the same package.  Its more mobile than the patriot which is already considered a 'great medium' and has 220 hull/240 turret not to mention 150 side armor with 40 on tracks for no reason at all lol.  Since there isn't a model in tanks.gg I reserve final judgement on effective armor but on paper it looks like it would be an absurd addition, especially for strongholds/etc.  Regardless, a visual difference like this kv-2 which has identical stats to an existing tech tree tank is completely different than adding new tanks to the game and thus its apples to oranges.  It isn't hypocritical to point that out.  Like I said before I really don't care if they added your anime tanks as a visual thing, in fact I think that'd be great for the reasons I mentioned.

 

Also, that winrate is with a very small data set.  Like < 10% of the average number of games in vbaddict comparisons for tier 8 heavies.  On top of that your data is just wrong.  Tiger II has the lowest at 46% and that is with 26 times the number of games in the data set.

 

You just seem aggressively pro-anime lol.  Save that fight for someone who cares about the visuals.  I just don't want to see even more power creep tier 8 prems added.



BLAZE_511 #70 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:46

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 14152 battles
  • 56
  • [PRAVH] PRAVH
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013
This should have came with a unique Imperial Guard crew that would have made it so much better imo, also i'm kinda sad it was Valhallan rather than the Death Korps of Krieg but that's just me nitpicking

CapPhrases #71 Posted May 16 2018 - 19:54

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 7276 battles
  • 3,512
  • [TXV] TXV
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostBLAZE_511, on May 16 2018 - 13:46, said:

This should have came with a unique Imperial Guard crew that would have made it so much better imo, also i'm kinda sad it was Valhallan rather than the Death Korps of Krieg but that's just me nitpicking

 



Bavor #72 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 31687 battles
  • 2,967
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

View PostNagatoroHayase, on May 16 2018 - 12:52, said:

Just a reminder for anyone who approves of this tank and not the Valkyrie Chronicles tanks, you're a hypocrite.

 

Nope.  The KV-2 is a reskin.  The BDR G 1B is a reskin.  The Nameless is an OP tier 8 tank that many equal tier 8 tanks can't penetrate form the front and it has above average speed and mobility for a tank with that armor along with a very good gun.  Players don't want another OP tank added to the game.

Huma474 #73 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:11

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 4550 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-03-2014

View PostNagatoroHayase, on May 16 2018 - 17:52, said:

Just a reminder for anyone who approves of this tank and not the Valkyrie Chronicles tanks, you're a hypocrite.

 



BLAZE_511 #74 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:18

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 14152 battles
  • 56
  • [PRAVH] PRAVH
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013

View PostCapPhrases, on May 16 2018 - 18:54, said:

Spoiler

 

 



Huma474 #75 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:28

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 4550 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-03-2014

View Postseekerjuanchis, on May 16 2018 - 19:25, said:

Content Moderated by HeadlockMvnky

 

The Emperors gold doesn't pay for itself :-), the price prolly has more to do with GW than WG

Edited by HeadlockMvnky, May 16 2018 - 22:20.


Backfire_ #76 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 28985 battles
  • 2,252
  • [X-OUT] X-OUT
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View Postseekerjuanchis, on May 16 2018 - 14:25, said:

Content Moderated by HeadlockMvnky

 

Aren't the Warhammer models like $40 bucks for a 2 inch tall piece of plastic these days?  I haven't played table-top in ages but I'm surprised they authorized 40k rights for less than 50 bucks lol.

Edited by HeadlockMvnky, May 16 2018 - 22:20.


CapPhrases #77 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:46

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 7276 battles
  • 3,512
  • [TXV] TXV
  • Member since:
    03-28-2015

View PostHuma474, on May 16 2018 - 14:28, said:

 

The Emperors gold doesn't pay for itself :-), the price prolly has more to do with GW than WG

 

that's what I was thinking honestly. GW is probably needing a piece of the profits so that's why the price has been set where it is. on that note:



SpectreHD #78 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:48

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 16650 battles
  • 16,880
  • [TT] TT
  • Member since:
    07-12-2010


BLAZE_511 #79 Posted May 16 2018 - 20:55

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 14152 battles
  • 56
  • [PRAVH] PRAVH
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013

This thread is just going to devolve into 40k memes isnt it?

 



Huma474 #80 Posted May 16 2018 - 21:04

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 4550 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-03-2014

View PostBLAZE_511, on May 16 2018 - 19:55, said:

This thread is just going to devolve into 40k memes isnt it?

Spoiler

 

 



Edited by Huma474, May 16 2018 - 21:08.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users