Jump to content


* * - - - 1 votes

Warhammer 40k Tanks

warhammer 40k tanks feedback

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

PW59 #41 Posted Jun 24 2018 - 19:19

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 21816 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    10-11-2015
I would like to have the KV 2 but I refuse to spend any money with WG after the arty nerf,

AtreidesN7 #42 Posted Jul 02 2018 - 01:57

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 921 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    06-30-2014

View PostAvalon304, on May 17 2018 - 21:12, said:

They look great. Now bring the Valkyria tanks out here.

 

This x10

 

I am semi-surprised at the player base's anger/push back towards these types of tanks and any other 'non-historical' tanks.

I think people forget that a lot of the tanks in this game were/are only blueprints, prototypes (acceptable though) or barely even 'paper tanks.' 

In line with that, that creates a lot of liberal' stats and values that are only slightly or partially based in fact.

 

So many of the actual produced tanks are changed for 'balancing,' for example, the 88mm (56 and 71) has much higher pen values, proven. But yet, that is not reflected in game (on this, the 88mm L56 could not be nerfed anymore with an insulting and garbage pen value of only 145mm, please the actual pen value is the equivalent to the in game 88mm 71 values).

Adding a bit of diversity in the game with Valkyria Chronicle tanks ​isn't a crazy or poor notion, plus they don't exactly look out of the timeline or design of WW2 era tanks.

 

If things like that annoy you, the crazy Russian tanks that barely feel like they are balanced at all should infuriate you.



Omega_Weapon #43 Posted Jul 03 2018 - 00:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 49161 battles
  • 2,108
  • [GRIEF] GRIEF
  • Member since:
    11-15-2011

View PostAtreidesN7, on Jul 01 2018 - 19:57, said:

I am semi-surprised at the player base's anger/push back towards these types of tanks and any other 'non-historical' tanks.

I think people forget that a lot of the tanks in this game were/are only blueprints, prototypes (acceptable though) or barely even 'paper tanks.' 

In line with that, that creates a lot of liberal' stats and values that are only slightly or partially based in fact.

 

So many of the actual produced tanks are changed for 'balancing,' for example, the 88mm (56 and 71) has much higher pen values, proven. But yet, that is not reflected in game (on this, the 88mm L56 could not be nerfed anymore with an insulting and garbage pen value of only 145mm, please the actual pen value is the equivalent to the in game 88mm 71 values).

Adding a bit of diversity in the game with Valkyria Chronicle tanks ​isn't a crazy or poor notion, plus they don't exactly look out of the timeline or design of WW2 era tanks.

 

Yes the tanks in game are not 100% realistic or accurate, but they are still based closely on real tanks that were built or in most other cases were going to be built until circumstances changed. The "fabricated" tanks are very plausible and were needed to bridge gaps in tech trees. There is still a feel of historical accuracy in the game, even after blueprint and theoretical tanks are included. It still maintains a historical feel even with armour and gun values tweaked to suit wargaming's idea of balance. The Warhammer tanks don't go too far because they are just regular tank models already in the game with some added decoration. Completely fictional cartoon tanks invented just for use in an anime are too much for many players like myself who got into this game because we love tanks and real military history. Once it gets to that point may as well add in heat seeking missiles, AT-STs and Mario Kart consumable too.

Edited by Omega_Weapon, Jul 03 2018 - 01:03.


rich73 #44 Posted Jul 04 2018 - 23:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 53583 battles
  • 6,467
  • Member since:
    10-17-2011

View PostBigDollarBillz, on May 17 2018 - 07:58, said:

Nothing wrong with what you guys did by making a premium version of the kv-2. I just wish y'all would find a way to bring the player base back. I can't afford to get the kv-2 or any other premium after becoming disabled from a stroke and failing heart. I would love to start seeing 30 to 50 k players online.

 

You dont see this as just a cheap way to grab money?WG should actually work for their money,as in improving the biggest peave of the game called MM.And getting rid of crashes and bugs would be good work for them also.Not just easy ways to milk kids of their money.

EmperorJuliusCaesar #45 Posted Oct 19 2018 - 06:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 31097 battles
  • 5,070
  • [EOR] EOR
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostGnomon, on May 17 2018 - 22:42, said

 

 

For the Emperor! :izmena:

 

^^^^

Sounds good to me :-)

 

But yeah, I love the KV2-R, a bit low in tier for my taste, def as low as I can possibly play.



nrnstraswa #46 Posted Oct 22 2018 - 16:13

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 15786 battles
  • 427
  • [AJ] AJ
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
Please make Mordian BDR a full premium tank, too expensive for just a skin. 

Mikosah #47 Posted Oct 22 2018 - 18:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 17582 battles
  • 4,090
  • Member since:
    01-24-2013
All things considered, the idea of having a skin that can be turned on/off at will and hidden by the 'disable unhistorical customization' toggle is probably the best way to have handled this matter. And as of the idea of making a premium clone of an existing tank like the KV-2, there's nothing wrong with that. Now we just need clown skins like the Patriot and Liberte to work the same way.

AZandEL #48 Posted Oct 26 2018 - 02:02

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 28054 battles
  • 545
  • Member since:
    09-06-2012

View Postrich73, on Jul 04 2018 - 22:18, said:

 

You dont see this as just a cheap way to grab money?WG should actually work for their money,as in improving the biggest peave of the game called MM.And getting rid of crashes and bugs would be good work for them also.Not just easy ways to milk kids of their money.

 

So wait - you are blaming someone for pursuing the easiest possible thing to make money? The players only have themselves to blame - if they are stupid enough to pay $50 for some pixels that costs maybe one designer one day to implement then of course WG will take that every day all day long for as long as possible. Did you forget the entire "black" line of tanks???





Also tagged with warhammer, 40k, tanks, feedback

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users